 |
No Mutants Allowed We were here before the fall....
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
maximaz Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!


Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 2247
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| Brother None wrote: |
MCA has always been fairly positive about Fallout 3 when asked. This blog post is really pointless, not just because he's currently in Bethesda's employ but also because both his positives and negatives are almost all nitpicky, peripheral stuff. He avoids talking about writing, core mechanics, combat and other fairly vital stuff pretty much completely, or only in small chunks.
So meh. |
Exactly. He basically avoided the question by talking about random details rather than the whole. He just said a lot without really saying anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Khan FurSainty Look, Ma! Two Heads!


Joined: 23 Apr 2009 Posts: 326 Location: Bulgaria Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:00 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Exactly. He basically avoided the question by talking about random details rather than the whole. He just said a lot without really saying anything. |
Bethesda has teached him well... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul_cz Where'd That 6th Toe Come From?


Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Czech Republic Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:49 Post subject: |
|
|
You DON'T shit where you eat.
With that said, I have no doubt that eventhough he probably saw a lot of problems with FO3, he still had fun and would classify it as a good game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jero cvmi Look, Ma! Two Heads!


Joined: 08 Oct 2008 Posts: 399 Location: ~# _ Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| Brother None wrote: |
MCA has always been fairly positive about Fallout 3 when asked. This blog post is really pointless, not just because he's currently in Bethesda's employ but also because both his positives and negatives are almost all nitpicky, peripheral stuff. He avoids talking about writing, core mechanics, combat and other fairly vital stuff pretty much completely, or only in small chunks.
So meh. |
I wasn't expecting that he would talk about something more substantial.
Except maybe the beards.
I wonder how Chris Avellone feels about Fallut 3's beards.
 _________________ Fallout 3:
[Science] -Robot! Let me in!
Fallout:New Vegas:
[Science 18/80] -Robot! Let me in!
see? it wasn't all that difficult after all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frosty_theaussie Still Mildly Glowing


Joined: 22 Nov 2003 Posts: 270
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| rcorporon wrote: |
| All respect to MCA, but fast travel was rubbish. In FO1 & 2 there was the map, but it wasn't really "fast travel" and you could still have random encounters. In FO3 you just zipped from place to place.. a game mechanic designed for today's "Mountain Dew" generation. |
Pretty steep generalisation, there. To say that one form of fast travel is for an attention-deficit crowd while another is substantially better seems to me like you're just trying to keep in line with the hating. _________________ "People always call it luck when you've acted more sensibly than they have." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ausir Toaster Repair Man


Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Posts: 4119 Location: The Vault - Fallout Wiki Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:51 Post subject: |
|
|
And, even if we don't consider Bethesda, he probably wouldn't mention things that he doesn't like but that Obsidian won't be able to improve upon in New Vegas, since he'd be criticizing his own game this way. _________________ The Vault - Fallout Wiki *Wasteland 2 Wiki * Torment and Numenera Wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncannyGarlic Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!


Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Posts: 2087
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| rcorporon wrote: |
| All respect to MCA, but fast travel was rubbish. In FO1 & 2 there was the map, but it wasn't really "fast travel" and you could still have random encounters. In FO3 you just zipped from place to place.. a game mechanic designed for today's "Mountain Dew" generation. |
For a game like Oblivion and Fallout 3, it's probably pretty necessary. Running from place to place isn't very fun and eats up a lot of time, especially when backtracking. Such is the problem with open world games with random encounters. That said, I agree that both Oblivion and Fallout 3 failed to even try to explain the system in universe and that the system was flawed and that a system more like FO 1, 2, & Tactics would be ideal. I haven't gotten around to playing NWN2:SoZ yet but it's system as described sounded good as well.
| Ausir wrote: |
| And, even if we don't consider Bethesda, he probably wouldn't mention things that he doesn't like but that Obsidian won't be able to improve upon in New Vegas, since he'd be criticizing his own game this way. |
Yeah, the reasons that he would be light on criticism are numerous and include simple things like professional courtesy. Personally, I'd like to see developers publicly rip apart games, especially if they did so in a group, as I see it as a productive process to break games apart and figure out what does and does not work and why. It'd also be nice if gaming journalists in general did the same. _________________
"Pessimism is, in brief, playing the sure game. You cannot lose at it; you may gain. It is the only view of life in which you can never be disappointed. Having reckoned what to do in the worst possible circumstances, when better arise, as they may, life becomes child's play."
~Thomas Hardy
"Idealism is what precedes experience; cynicism is what follows."
~David T. Wolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jero cvmi Look, Ma! Two Heads!


Joined: 08 Oct 2008 Posts: 399 Location: ~# _ Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 14:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| UncannyGarlic wrote: |
For a game like Oblivion and Fallout 3, it's probably pretty necessary. Running from place to place isn't very fun and eats up a lot of time, especially when backtracking. |
Exactly. That's why the travelling dot on the world map is a better solution.
I don't see why that wouldn't work for Fallout 3: You would be able to fast travel to any map marker, and any encounter, location or container on your course would just interrupt the fast travel.
That way you wouldn't be forcefed countless hours of emptiness.
I'm no expert on Bethesda's engine, but it doesn't sound impossible.
| Quote: |
| Yeah, the reasons that he would be light on criticism are numerous and include simple things like professional courtesy. Personally, I'd like to see developers publicly rip apart games, especially if they did so in a group, as I see it as a productive process to break games apart and figure out what does and does not work and why. It'd also be nice if gaming journalists in general did the same. |
But... but that would boost CREATIVITY!  _________________ Fallout 3:
[Science] -Robot! Let me in!
Fallout:New Vegas:
[Science 18/80] -Robot! Let me in!
see? it wasn't all that difficult after all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphadrop Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!


Joined: 21 Aug 2008 Posts: 2288 Location: Subway City. Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 14:26 Post subject: |
|
|
There was a mod way back that tried to add random encounters to fast travel in F3. It showed it was possible but was incredibaly buggy. _________________ I shall use the pointy sticks of SCIENCE!
Scandium Iodine Noen Cerium! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jero cvmi Look, Ma! Two Heads!


Joined: 08 Oct 2008 Posts: 399 Location: ~# _ Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 14:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, sorry i'm not being very clear. I'm not talking about adding random encounters. I meant something more like the option to always fast travel to the closest thing that would appear on your compass in the direction you're moving.
Suppose the player wants to go to the location X which is in the general direction "NorthWest".
In fallout 3, if the player turned towards that direction, several markers would appear in his/her compass according to the Perception stat, right?
Now instead of forcing the player to walk "NorthWest", the game could provide the option to try and fast travel to X.
Then it could relocate the player to the closest mark on the compass, and ask if the player wants to encounter what is there.
If the player accepted, or failed a skill check, e.g. for Sneaking, he/she would teleport to the encounter.
Otherwise the game would compute the compass again and repeat the whole process until the player got to Location X which was the initial destination. _________________ Fallout 3:
[Science] -Robot! Let me in!
Fallout:New Vegas:
[Science 18/80] -Robot! Let me in!
see? it wasn't all that difficult after all.
Last edited by jero cvmi on Sun Feb 21, 2010 16:17; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jet1337 It Wandered In From the Wastes


Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 187
Status: Offline Strikes: 1
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 14:52 Post subject: |
|
|
The way I could see a random enounter mod for fast traveling is like this:
1. You fast-travel ( you go along a straight invisible line from your position ).
2. The game plots the encounter point somewhere along that line if the following conditions are met:
-If the area is clear of any objects and can be accessed normally by the player
-If the random number generator lands in the game's favor ( to spawn the encounter )
3. If the above conditions are met, you will be placed a few meters away from the event when you exit the loading screen. This is to give you some room to work with if you get an encounter like the Yao Guai or other dangerous creature encounter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Black Vault Senior Citizen


Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 1230
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 14:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| jero cvmi wrote: |
Exactly. That's why the travelling dot on the world map is a better solution.
|
I agree. Dot + random encounters is basically allowing you to make the world seem alive thanks to encounters and avoid walking just for the sake of walking, without anything going on.
edit: Actually I think that Arcanum had the best idea. You had some random encounters (mostly shitty) but you also could walk manually, if you're that stubborn. _________________
| Quote: |
| True, fusion cells shouldn't just explode, but then again, I don't really care. Exploding cars are fun. |
FO3 target audience is FUN!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ausdoerrt So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs


Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 2872
Status: Offline Strikes: 1
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 15:59 Post subject: |
|
|
| Pff, if you did your walking manually in Arcanum, then I tip my hat to you, sir. And wonder how long it took to beat the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Morbus NMA News Team


Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 2444 Location: Porto, Portugal Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 16:08 Post subject: |
|
|
| Ausdoerrt wrote: |
| Pff, if you did your walking manually in Arcanum, then I tip my hat to you, sir. And wonder how long it took to beat the game. |
I would think that with about one thousand hours you'd have beaten the game. Manually walking takes less in-game time than fast travel, from my experience. I remember walking from the zepplin to this dude's house, which took me relatively little (like 15 minutes?) while with fast travel it would take quite a bit more.
But I may be wrong. _________________ Wendigo Design, by Tiago Sá
"And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror."
from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dionysus Look, Ma! Two Heads!

Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 357
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 16:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| jero cvmi wrote: |
Exactly. That's why the travelling dot on the world map is a better solution.
I don't see why that wouldn't work for Fallout 3: You would be able to fast travel to any map marker, and any encounter, location or container on your course would just interrupt the fast travel.
That way you wouldn't be forcefed countless hours of emptiness.
I'm no expert on Bethesda's engine, but it doesn't sound impossible. |
In Fallout 3, you don't explore the world with world-map travel. You only use fast-travel to backtrack to places you've been before. Adding random encounters to fast travel would just be counterproductive and annoying. Throwing in some sort of travel process screen would be OK as long as it doesn't take much time.
| Ausdoerrt wrote: |
| Pff, if you did your walking manually in Arcanum, then I tip my hat to you, sir. And wonder how long it took to beat the game. |
Yeah, the manual walking option is pretty pointless in Arcanum, although they did exploit it at least once that I remember.
Personally, I prefer Fallout 3's style of exploration. The original style feels more like a minigame in comparison. Of course, there's a cost in terms of scale and the emphasis on settlements. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Public Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!


Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 2010 Location: London, United Kingdom Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 17:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul_cz wrote: |
You DON'T shit where you eat.
With that said, I have no doubt that eventhough he probably saw a lot of problems with FO3, he still had fun and would classify it as a good game. |
Reading his mind you can, I see. _________________ My Royalty Free Stock Music:
soundcloud.com/voytekpavlik
More on Facebook:
facebook.com/voytek.corti.pavlik
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jero cvmi Look, Ma! Two Heads!


Joined: 08 Oct 2008 Posts: 399 Location: ~# _ Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 17:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| Dionysus wrote: |
| In Fallout 3, you don't explore the world with world-map travel. You only use fast-travel to backtrack to places you've been before. |
I know, that's the problem i'm talking about. You are forced to spend a very long time exploring empty spaces, and i think it would be possible to discover the same amount of content in much less time if a world-map travel system was used. _________________ Fallout 3:
[Science] -Robot! Let me in!
Fallout:New Vegas:
[Science 18/80] -Robot! Let me in!
see? it wasn't all that difficult after all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TyloniusFunk It Wandered In From the Wastes


Joined: 19 Nov 2008 Posts: 129
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 18:00 Post subject: Time in FO1/2 |
|
|
For me, the debate about travel is really getting at something else: a grand, overarching sense of scale. In FO1/2 you had a time sensitive mission from the outset and the time passed quickly enough on the world map so that you always felt just a little bit rushed. Every time you traveled from one main location to another. The entire game. FO3 lost this for me. I think the entire main story play through took me maybe 3-5 in-game days. (Yawner. Not epic.)
So listen up Obsidian. If you want NV to be epic, figure out how to blow weeks off the calender. Desolate years should mark the wasteland. Give us some elliptical editing. You don't necessarily need a time sensitive main mission, but give time a purpose other than the robotic storekeeper hours and video gamey day-night cycle.
(You know, the reason there's no instant travel in WoW is to make the world feel big, right? Perception(Time) = Space.)
To coin a phrase: The world's a smaller place for those with longer legs. _________________
"...on the soft fibers of the brain is founded the unshakable base of the soundest of empires." ~Servan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UncannyGarlic Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!


Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Posts: 2087
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 19:14 Post subject: |
|
|
| Dionysus wrote: |
| Adding random encounters to fast travel would just be counterproductive and annoying. Throwing in some sort of travel process screen would be OK as long as it doesn't take much time. |
Yeah I agree. Random encounters (pointless combat ones) really just add grinding and time wasting. Having time elapse from the travel would probably do the trick, make it do something like sleeping in Fallout 1&2 with the clock ticking by.
| TyloniusFunk wrote: |
| (You know, the reason there's no instant travel in WoW is to make the world feel big, right? Perception(Time) = Space.) |
Gotta say that it's crap design not to have a fast travel system in your MMO, most have one that they charge money for. _________________
"Pessimism is, in brief, playing the sure game. You cannot lose at it; you may gain. It is the only view of life in which you can never be disappointed. Having reckoned what to do in the worst possible circumstances, when better arise, as they may, life becomes child's play."
~Thomas Hardy
"Idealism is what precedes experience; cynicism is what follows."
~David T. Wolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dionysus Look, Ma! Two Heads!

Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 357
Status: Offline
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 19:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| jero cvmi wrote: |
| I know, that's the problem i'm talking about. You are forced to spend a very long time exploring empty spaces, and i think it would be possible to discover the same amount of content in much less time if a world-map travel system was used. |
Well in this case, the problem you've identified is one of the major strengths of the game.
In Fallout 3 the player actively navigates terrain, avoids or engages random travelers and monsters, and spots and pursues landmarks. For many that enjoyed the game (like Avellone), the exploration is one of the more entertaining aspects. Now, if you generally don't like exploration, then you might want to see it relegated to minigame status, but that would really just be changing the focus of the game rather than fixing a problem.
| UncannyGarlic wrote: |
| Having time elapse from the travel would probably do the trick, make it do something like sleeping in Fallout 1&2 with the clock ticking by. |
Technically time does elapse, but they could throw in a special loading screen to make it more obvious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|