Comments on Profile Post by 0wing

  1. JO'Geran
    JO'Geran
    To be fair, National Geographic simply portray things that are happening in the world at the moment. From what I can tell, they aren't expressing an opinion, they are simply acknowledging that there are trans people in the world.
    Dec 19, 2016
  2. 0wing
    0wing
    The fact that parents are such degenerate SJWs is the point.
    Not only this, but wasn't NG a science-related magazine? What's exactly so scientific about ruining a kid's life just because he happend to play for a girl in the face of incompetent idiots? If you say "I'm a robocop", your parents won't blast several shotgun shots and send you to Detroit for cybernetic surgery.
    Dec 19, 2016
  3. JO'Geran
    JO'Geran
    Dec 19, 2016
    SarcasticGoodGuy likes this.
  4. zegh8578
    zegh8578
    "degeneracy", that's some good old fashioned vocabulary right there. Nat Geo are not a "science magazine" they are a "journalistic magazine", so, they report from what happens around the world. If you actually read Nat Geo you'd know that. 60 pages about Mongolian food isn't science, it's "travel" and "culture". Reporting on transgenderism is something Nat Geo is bound to do, being into cultural reporting.
    Dec 19, 2016
    JO'Geran likes this.
  5. zegh8578
    zegh8578
    If you're gonna start accusing journalism of promoting everything they report on, we're gonna be in some serious trouble with journalism in general. Report on war = promote war. Report on torture = promote torture. Report on transgenders = SJW Championism wanting to destroy the future generation.
    Dec 19, 2016
    JO'Geran likes this.