Except that's more of a game about fulfilling an elected (or bestowed; or forcibly taken) office—"role", as opposed to whether that particular ruler is helplessly indecisive, inept, or a coward, a sycophant, a tyrant, a community organizer, an hydrophobic; a liar; an idealist, or an opportunist. IE. [supporting, or at least responding to] the difference between Atilla, Alexander, and Ichabod (or Frasier) Crane running the nation—that would be roleplaying IMO. *That their personalities make the significant difference. Nowadays, it's almost purely empowerment fantasy. The modern idea of RPG... is Westworld; as a digitally simulated activity themepark.