Search results

Why is it the games fault that someone takes a compressed print screen with low brightness?

Looks a lot better. So the first guy deliberately took the worst screenshots possible to troll the fans and then compressed them and used low brightness...

These new PS4 screenshots look 10 times better. So the Spanish guy posted compressed pics with weird lightning..

Whatever, hate all you want. Still this game is shaping up to be awesome.

Are you trolling?

I would bet € 1000 that it looks great on PC.

These are console graphics.. consoles aren't capable of producing anything better...

I play on console (i am a poor student) so I get to play the crappiest looking version anyway. I Just don't understand why people think this looks worse than other games on PS4.

The Spanish guy posting these pics is hating on them. Go look at his posts. He says it looks like shit. But he says it runs really smooth.

On console.. yes.. don't see much difference. There's just this limitation with these gen consoles.. On PC witcher 3 is far superiour of course.

Supposed? I don't think they have been doing anything else at least the last 4 years. I played over 100 hours of Witcher 3 on PS4, loved it, but it doesn't look that different graphic wise and has lots of framedrops while Fallout 4 (according to the Spanish guy posting the pics) runs smoothly.

It looks just as expected on the consoles. No groundbreaking visuals, just average solid graphics. No surprise here. We all know Fallout never looks groundbreaking, it's an enormous open world where you can do anything... not Uncharted or Crysis.

The one ia in dialog, the other is ik action.

The Dutch ghost. They literally sent the copies of Fallout 4 to reviewers 3 days ago. How could anyone even play enough of the game before the 9th to give a review? Besides the 9th is still 2 days in advance so everyone can cancel their pre order if the game turns out to be crap.

Looks amazing. Really don't understand the people bitching about the graphics. Some people even saying it looks like last gen.... What the f? It looks as good as the Witcher or Bloodborne.

1. Because they can try new approaches. You haven't even played the game and don't know how it's going to work. 2. Not everything does look like colonial era Boston. 3. Does Mass Effect have a patent on voiced protagonists? I haven't heard. Why the fuck is it ripped from Mass Effect when...

I really disagree. The unique selling point of Fallout 1/2 is it's RPG mechanics/story. Not the fact that it is top down or turn based. Firstly it's an RPG and secondly it's top down. So long as the sequel to Fallout is a RPG game that captures that same feeling of Fallout it's a Fallout...

Really happy Bethesda has shown as little as possible. I want to be surprised by the awesome/unpredictable open world. I, like millions of other gamers, already knew that I would buy Fallout 4 5 years ago. The only thing i needed was a release date.

Why would Bethesda care? They sold 20 million copies of Skyrim? Their trailer for Fallout 4 has been watched 16 million times (almost more than Skyrim's 5 year old trailer). They have tons of pre orders. Don't forget that Bethesda's sales grow with every released titles. So next to Fallout...

Why would they? There are certain properties that just don't have to do that. This is one of the most anticipated games ever. GTA V, Fallout, Half Life, Red Dead all could be released with a very short and small marketing campaign. The same thing in movies. Star Wars showed 1 teaser...