Search results

there are actually plenty of quests in fo2 that require you to kill. while they might not be necessary for completing the game (some of them actually might be, I don't remember), it's still necessary from a completionist's (my) standpoint. so then you would expect a critical hit "in a forceful...

every game has requirements to win and requirements are often targets that need to be taken out. actually there are quests in this game that require you to kill, maybe not necessary for finishing the game (?) (not sure, can't remember, so tired at this point), but certainly required for...

but b4 you've played the game you don't really know how your allocation is going to work out. you're guessing. you don't know that this is a game that won't require you to ever kill anything or if you'll need speech at XX% to complete certain quests. how do I know that speech won't just allow...

no, really, what's there to do except heal an ally or attack an enemy during combat? I suppose you could attack, get out of range, rinse repeat after he steps forward? so that he gets one less shot it? this isn't even viable with party members though. if I play through this again it will be...

EDIT: oh and modoc is interesting? temple of trials? klamath? the mayor of NCR really shouldn't even believe that you're the "chosen one," why isn't that a joke to her like it is to every other npc? just b/c she had a run in with the last one? shouldn't that just confirm that narg isn't...

in a table top rpg, wouldn't you pick perks that helped you level up faster in the beginning? wouldn't you expect that to pay for itself eventually? not so in fallout 2, b/c before your 6th perk is chosen the game is won. that's dumb, sorry.

b/c new reno is the only interesting place? beyond that (and I suppose redding, vault city, and ncr can be grouped with it only b/c they interact with it), it takes a nose dive to rock bottom but starts to slowly climb again (even if it never comes close to reaching those heights again). if...

easier. of course. how? fo2's gameplay consists of clicking and nothing else. maybe typing a number when you're in a menu, but that's not even necessary. you might occasionally hold down the shift key to run if you don't have it set to always run. actions per minute required for completing...

WOW. the only fo2 fan to ever concede a single point. holy shit. you're a rare thing. very, very rare. I did go to options and turn the combat speed to max, but don't think I saved and don't remember experiencing a difference but it was probably b/c I hadn't had a battle in the time that I...

oh yes it does. I knew for a fact that ppl would assume that the only reason I even played FO2 is b/c I played FO4 when I actually haven't played FO4 yet (BECAUSE I remember jack shit from FO2 [b/c it sucks])

oh and that whole massive amount of posts to reddit were all within the past 2 or 3 days b/c I've recently gotten back into FO2 after putting it down for sucking so hard. but after every phantasy star, breath of fire, tales of, suikoden, megami tensei, final fantasy, baldur's gate, icewind...

parrot who speaks only in memes detected, who's never said an original thing in his life and most likely no one ever responds to b/c there's nothing to respond to. and it's in the title: I don't like fo4. actually it's not copy pasted at all, it's much different. I obv typed it all up again...

troll? oh it's a troll, that's your counter-argument b/c there is no real one, correct? how can I troll by stating facts? EDIT: and why should I be banned? b/c my criticism is real? if it was some dumbass posting while misspelling half his words and using poor grammar you'd archive it, but...

"you were critically hit in the head for 0 damage. the bruise will look nice and make for good party talk." okay. "you critically missed and lost your next turn." I'll just assume I completely missed... a lot harder than usual, then. right. "tough alien was hit for 0 damage. tough alien...