Search results

Wrong. It is not innovative in the slightest because it is not the first game to bring a series into a 3-D environment, and Fallout 3 completely missed the point of how Fallout portrayed the 50s. The graphics were low-tier (being an open-world "RPG" does not excuse how poor the game looks), the...

This is the type of mentality Bethesda and other Triple A companies expect from the average gamer, which is quite sad really. Whenever I hear or read this phrase, it makes cringe intensely. "Herr derp, it's a video game." No shit, Sherlock, but it does not excuse nonsensical world design when...

I have never even seen this character before, and I have been to the 188 Trading Post countless times.

If you could not play as a stupid character in Fallout 3, I think it was clear Bethesda will never bother to put the time and effort to bring something like this back.

Then that is on them. They brought the game on their preferred system, they should be at least smart enough to know what should be expected out of universal modding.

I can understand someone would enjoy it, but what charm did it have, aside from being the most popular game in the series?

No. They are dead. Let it go.

The fact anyone would consider a buggy game upon release "near perfection" is asinine.

One of the few people on YouTube with a functioning brain.

Take a gander at the comment section.

Too bad she died of old age before she could realize what was once her peaceful home village, has now turned into a corrupt resurrection pre-war California's state government.

How hard is it to understand that a game does not need to be "100% REALISMZ" to create a believable video game world?

The fact that people use this excuse to pardon inconsistent and ill-conceived world-building is just baffling. Wrong. This mindset is sure to severely damage the writing of said game.

This line of thinking is just plain stupid, really. It is practically the same argument used to argue that the removal of skills (Fallout 4) is a "good" thing. Yet, you cannot even point out the flaws of your arguments.

No, but failing to understand why we are and making baseless assessments towards this community does tend to make us bitter.

Bethesda should not ignore Obsidian from a gameplay and characterization (maybe even writing) standpoint because despite the fact that NV was crippled by an unstable piece of outdated garbage, they added more personality to companions, they balanced out level system, and difficulty levels were...

Strongly disagree. It makes no sense to accept their lore as canon when they do not even try to respect the lore that the original developers created. Call it petty and nonsensical as much as you like, I am still going to disregarded Bethesda's lore because their writing development is in...

My mistake. I assumed you were responding to me because you were the first one to post after I did.

Pay more attention to what I just stated in my previous post. I never implied NCR's expansion was from during the events during New Vegas, because obviously, that is not the case. My whole post was solely focusing on why Bethesda would just decide to consider anything in New Vegas canon when it...

Did everyone just forget the last Bethesda Fallout game disregarded almost everything that happen in Fallout 1 and 2? This being a middle finger to many people is sensible because no one should have expected Bethesda to touch the lore of the West Coast Fallout games.