Search results

Either way, the point is, an enemy type is not to make the claim that a supposed "spin-off" (Fallout: New Vegas) follows the lore of a supposed "sequel" (Fallout 3). Obsidian had 18 months to develop the game, so redesigning an existing enemy type was not in their priorities at all, especially...

It is Power Armor, no one should be able to taught how to wear something that is supposed to protect them. PA training just makes little sense from a logical or lore perspective, because if any idiot is capable of wearing any other armor, then they are capable of wearing PA. You simply just step...

I disagree the rationale in this statment. The only reason why Feral Ghouls in NV act similar to their Fallout 3 counterparts is because they are built on the same engine; that does not mean NV treats Fallout 3 as canon.

Unfortunately, not many people have enough sense to realize this.

First of all, some of this "weirdness" can easily be glossed over because they are either irrevelant to the plot or lore of the game, is an easter egg/reference to a certain part of media (i.e. the intelligent radscopion), or are just not random in the slightest. Secondly, the game never implies...

You forgot to mention that there were NCR troops at Hoover Dam sporting their iteration of Power Armor. The only reason I can see for PA training being implemented in the first place is because for pacing/balancing reasons, which are not very valid reasons to begin with.

Nonsense. Fallout 1 and 2 were waaaay more consistent with their lore and writing than Fallout 3 ever was, and that also applies to Fallout 4. When was the last time yo actually play these games, or at least look up the Fallout lore on wikipedia? Yes, each Fallout installment was inconsistent...

It is laughable, seeing these people reveal their narrow-minded thinking and judgement. However, they have at least one valid reason why they would give negative opinions about the first two games without playing them: turn-based combat does not appeal to them.

I really cannot see an argument to support the claim Metal would not exist in the Fallout series, unless we follow Bethesda's vision on what the pre-war world was like.

...Oblivion, with guns.

It should be pretty obvious that he is not.

If you were in his position, what would you would have done?

Bam. I signed the petition. Only 33 more to go.

What a beautiful family. Yes, because judging me based on a single post that I made makes you any better, you egotisical cunt. Labeling him as a stupid fuck is justifiable because not only was he being a fucking moron, but he was also being "an arrogant, hateful asshole". Does not ring a bell to...

My thoughts exactly. I mostly disagree with @Battlecross, but not to the point where I believe he should be banned from these forums.

Maybe I would accept the idea of having weapon degradation in a hardcore mode if it would actually implemented properly. Guns wore down unrealistically too fast in 3/NV.

These stupid fucks...

I am glad it is good; one of few smart things that Bethesda has done. Weapon degradation was a pointless mechanic that serve no purpose, other than making more the Repair Skill slightly more useful than it was in Fallout 1 and 2..

Fallout 2 was a massive disappointment, in terms of the storyline. I cannot comprehend how anyone would think Fallout 1 "did not have much of a storyline" when it was written on a much higher intellectual level. Compare Pesident Richardson to the Master.

But let us be honest, every single character in Fallout 3 needed to die onscreen and be canon.