Search results

Looks good.

Oh man, more customized NPCs/locations/weapons? Uh oh. Oh schmell, I can live with some silly names. Shadowrun? Good thing I've been saving so much money with Steam sales, 'cause that's another game I'd love to see. Unfortunately, at this rate, I'm not too confident they'll hit the 400k mark...

I have enjoyed watching my 10-intelligence character's ass get handed to him. :) Seriously, though, I was pretty impressed with what they've done with the engine, granted it's an indie game. Also, all those skill checks *drool*. I agree with the camera control being kinda annoying at first, but...

Not everyone. It's not nice to use absolutes :)

It's still RTwP. Just like Baldur's Gate or Neverwinter Nights, all of the units' actions take place concurrently. A turn-based game should only have one active unit at a time, while the rest of the units are frozen in place until it is their turn. I can't think of any turn-based games that...

Oops, sorry. That is Michael Jordon laughing. At you.

I don't think he meant Fallout 3 - it seems he was talking about Fallout 1 and 2. Lol at the mention of menu-based combat being "not very good" then ending with this: Wizardry 8's (menu-based) combat would not get my vote. A hybrid skill system in which a character gained skill points...

No wise person would think there's a 100% success rate, but you can't blame people for being optimistic when there's several of the original crew, probable ex-BIS/Obsidian cooperation and a lack of publisher influence. I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion, but saying "Fargo is creating...

:clap: It all looks great.

I got owned by the first enemy :( Disarmed me 3 fuggin times. Will try again with a less-persuasive, more-combative character.

:shrug: A simple-to-implement item/note exchange system doesn't worry me. Just like cheats: if you don't like it, don't use it. I'm just glad to hear they aren't thinking about fleshing out a multiplayer system - that would be a lot harder to implement. Mod tools would be awesome, IMO, but...

Meh - I'd prefer is they complete the game then consider multiplayer(e.g. SS2). With a turn-based combat system, all I can think about is a system like Final Fantasy 3 - the primary character controls party movement but in combat the control of the characters is divied among the players.

Will def. check out when I get home tonight. Thanks for the beta!

lol @ the people thinking they know how Fargo should do his job. Go ahead and keep exemplifying the Armageddon soothsayer. You're wrong? You look like an asshole. You end up being right? You're still an asshole but with no reason to brag about it. Just let it be. A dose of cynicism or...

I really wouldn't mind this(Sorry!). Having recently played Fallout 2 again and with my current run-through of Wizardry 8, I'm bored to tears waiting for 10-20 things to cycle through a single turn. It wouldn't be so bad if there was an option to skip the animations completely. That said, they...

2.37 mil. Definitely happy they hit the minimum mark, but I wouldn't be singing victory against the major gaming companies. Stuff with the project can go wrong.

Fur sure. If you have a reddit account, here's the two most promising submissions to upvote. http://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/quh08/wasteland_2_kickstarter_project_started_by_inxile/ http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/qugan/brians_fargo_wasteland_2_kickstarter_project_has/

Awesomeo. Already put up my fliff. I checked reddit, and it's not getting the attention Double Fine did. I hope it gets at least on r/gaming's frontpage.

This invoked probably the biggest of several "Thank God" moments I had while reading the interview. Makes sense with the limited budget, but also hurts contemporary games. It's kind of hard to have 4-6 dialogue options when you need to record audio for every single of the dialogue trees'...