Search results

@ sai|glyph You were the one picking on perfectly valid quests and that and only that triggered my response. You could have just written that these are all speculations for now but nooo... It's better to pick on good quests from previous games to make Fallout 3 look better. The first quest...

Re: To BN and Per Who said it was the only source of water? How can you know it didn't break recently and the person responsible for conservation wasn't around? Or even better, almost anyone could do it but someone was smart enough to use you do to the work. It's nothing as far-fetched as...

Huh? Are you one of Fallout creators? If not, how can you know that radiation in the Glow wouldn't be dangerous? Do we know what was stored in the Glow? After all it was weapons-research facility where Power Armors and energy weapons were created. They must have had radioactive materials, who...

So if the person giving me some task dies there will be replacement for him and I will be able to finish the quest. I wonder what will happen if I kill deputy, will there appear deputy's deputy? In some cases that would make sense, for example if I had to bring water chip to Vault but he...

Cool? Cool to whom? And how can you "handle properly" ant spewing fire? It seems retarded from every angle. Also whether it's consistent with movies from 50-60 years ago isn't an issue here because we're talking about Fallout here not remake of Them! or whatever. In Fallout 2 (not to mention 1)...

The problem is they've been saying this whole time they made Fallout 3 more serious and avoided excess of nonsense which occurred sometimes in F2, yet we have fire ants, deadly teddy bears, house decorating, mini-nuke launchers, psychic and freezing guns or towns built on the nuclear bomb...

That sounds awful. It's very artificial, they both have bad diction and intonation, not to mention the sound of the voices itself is annoying. If they allowed everyone to participate in competition I'm sure voice acting would be on higher level. Cheap shot Cenega.

It's the same as adding "IMO" to every post I write just because some retards can't figure out that I'm talking in my own name not everyone's. You're manipulating now, taking author's words out of context. You didn't somehow quote this fragment: Only retard would think that after half an hour...

I second that. Bloodlines is one of my favorite games of all time, although it doesn't have such "replayability" as Sacrifice or Fallout. I enjoyed the game very much. And sewers "stage" wasn't hard to clear. I don't know about bugs because from the start I've played patched version, maybe...

I don't understand Brother None either. What's so bad about having possibility to gain PA early? And what's so great about a perk that let's you learn how to use power armor? Assuming that using such armor is a difficult task it's strange to me that a perk can solve the problem unless you can...

Huh? Have I mentioned anywhere that I have a problem with perk? I'm writing that it's silly to think that getting power armor early was an easy task in previous Fallouts and you're writing about Bethesda's perk. You've got problems with reading with comprehension.

The blond guy says that in previous Fallouts you could get power armors too early, even though he couldn't even find the water chip (which is understandable). In Fallout 2 you couldn't get power armor early either UNLESS you knew exactly where Navarro is. So you want to tell me that thinking...

It's stupid then that they did this in such a manner. Why didn't they make the stats adequate to character's abilities and instead of 2% or 50% chance there should be 95% or 100% chance since he's on cheats anyway.

Firstly it's unnatural, I would expect more realism from a game released at the end of 2008. They could do better then the body falling apart. Even in Fallout 1 it was done better. Secondly he always HIT his opponents in VATS-mode, no matter how low his chances were.

Even dumber is that you can still shoot with a Fatman (which probably is the most heavy weapon in the game) while your arm is crippled. So character can't carry too much unless he has strong back perk or enough strength but he can use rifles, rocket/missle launchers even though his one arm is...

What's funny in it? I like FPS but I didn't want Fallout to become a hybrid of Postal or Blood 2 with STALKER and Oblivion. The more I watch gameplays and read previews the more I'm starting to whine. Sorry about this but I fail to see what's exciting about this game where every shot in...

And they didn't want children to be killable. Bethesda would have bigger chances to release it there if Fallout had isometric view instead of realistic graphics.

Huh? Why are you limiting options to only two? Don't be silly. In Fallout you couldn't sleep with some woman unless you fulfilled certain conditions i.e. you had to have stats high enough or for example you had to save the world first and have enough cash o course. Also sleeping with some woman...

Probably it's just my blind fanboyism but the last sentence I quoted gives me impression that he HAD to give recommendation (and couldn't criticize it) unfortunately he can't lie too much because he played only few hours.

Yep, got the same problem.