Search results

Fallout: Lonestar Texas is in turmoil. The Rangers who are comprised of ranchers and merchants are up against the Authortiarian Dictatorship of "The Crown" who believe the only path to peace is if everyone is controlled by one government. The Crown wishes to destroy the Ranger's libertarian...

Well written, interesting command structure. I like it a lot , I especially enjoy their Guerilla fear tactics.

Emil is not an inherently bad writer, and he is certainly not a bad guy in fact I believe the contrary. But in Fallout 4 his writing was inexcusable, I think his choices were somewhat limited anyway by the horrible dialogue system he had no say in as a writer(not designer). We saw in Skyrim...

DLC looks hard to tell from what we've seen so far, hope each zone doesn't end up being a shooting gallery. Slavers included though so maybe we can get a decent supplement.

Currently going to give Dishonored a go, ordered it for PS4. Hopefully it is good.

Playing Fallout 3 has made people want to do worse things..

Setting: 2295,North-eastern Texas culminating in Dallas (Going to pretend Fallout: Brotherhood Of Steel doesn't exit since it's non canon anyway) You are born in to Vault 117 a vault which was a vault filled with scientists to carry out research on plant life underground and policemen who work...

Vault 101 had in theory 1000 people , but obviously they couldn't show that many people. Just like in Fallout New Vegas the population of Freeside is greater than 40.

I didn't hate the environments they created. Downtown Boston,the coast,the city center and the main settlements such as Diamond City and Good Neighbhor look quite nice.

300 people is no doubt enough to sustain a populace for a while, but you said 50 mating pairs. There is a big difference. But yes I would agree the writers of Fallout overlooked that vaults could become a powerful force.

the problem is humans are inherently related organisms.

Your best argument about Argentina seems to be 'how much would the average briton want to protect the islands???' when in reality that is a stupid argument, Since the British people don't really care about bombing Afghanistan and having troops there either. But the army does it, And if...

Actually it's worth a lot to the UK government, it would be seen as weak to forefeit the islands. Why does Argentina want the islands? It's occupied by Brits and it's more prosperous than most of Argentina per person. (Yes the Falklands gdp per capita is 3 times, Argentina's.) I think...

They might as well, it would be shooting practice for the brits. A few Argentinians trying to gain the land. Britian could even invade Argentina mainland if they wanted and probably get a good result. Argentina taking the Falklands through war is impossible, and the decision to try doing so...