Search results

Fallout is something I've enjoyed very very much for many years. I probably wouldn't be on NMA at all if it wasn't. When something you enjoy very very much for a long period of time is screwed up into something you don't enjoy, doesn't that affect your life? You do realize what forums you're...

Which won't really matter if they've tailored the game to the compass the way they did in Oblivion. Bethesda obviously has no interest in making games for people who don't need their hand held throughout it and they make little to no provisions for those that might want to mod it in such a way.

And Bethesda keeps making the same STUPID game. We're just working with what they give us.

Very well done! I'd love to see these incorporated by mods. It's fine work like that which compels me to keep FO2 installed on my computer. How many games have this quality of work done for them even 10 years after their release?

Considering all the lip-service they gave earlier about wanting the game to have a more serious tone and contain less immature/childish things (like groin shots apparently), having a demo that contains something so silly and stupid leaves them wide open to be mocked. They should try to be more...

Which will result in a palm-sized mushroom cloud, because of course the Falloutz sure do need as many of those as can be crammed in there. Oh, and don't forget to mention that it would cause the target's limbs AND digits to fly off randomly no matter which body part you hit, because that's...

Well, I don't really think of it in a judicial sense. I think of it in more of an employment sense. I look at work history, I check priors. I see downhill results in gameplay quality and lack of depth in the type of game that Bethesda claims to be making. Don't call us, we'll call you.

Why put up such a defense about it then? Do you just not think that the devil has enough advocates? I was a fan of TES, so I know Bethesda can pull umpteen billion reasons from their asses for throwing in this or that, but forcing in a puzzle piece with a hammer doesn't really mean it belongs...

If FO:BoS has to be referenced in order for things in FO3 to 'make sense', that doesn't bode well for any new Fallout canon. :shock:

At the risk of continuing off-topic... I think Rowsdower and Mitchell could make quite a duo.

If you've seen Amazon Women on the Moon, it has a lot in common with KFM (some look at it as at least a spiritual successor). And the roots actually seem close to Firesign Theatre as well.

Pretty simple solution there that might even make it a bigger seller. Instead of puffing out their chest and strutting around with the "it's ours now and we're so much better than BIS in our cool modern style hahahahaha" attitude of calling it Fallout 3, they could have called it maybe Fallout...

But most game publishers and their marketing departments certainly seem to think just the opposite of that, at least concerning mentality. I wonder why. :?

Don't forget to make her young again, scantily clad and give her a couple of giant handguns. I think I have the solution for Jet on the east coast, though. Myron must have written all the manufacturing details down on a piece of paper and sealed it in a tube along with some samples of Jet...

Wow. So you can prove that millions of people actually 'loved' Oblivion rather than just bought it due to hype and inflated (probably paid for) review scores? As for this 'intended meaning', Fallout fans have dealt with too much bullshit over the years to fall for that. Or, for that matter...

It doesn't even seem to be the 'risk' that it wouldn't be profitable, but that oh-so-unthinkable possibility that it won't be hugely ungodly profitable if they don't pander to the lowest casual gamer denominator.

I don't see anyone asking for that to be done. What is the point of bringing that up over and over again when only a few (if any) of the very diehard Fallout fans are refusing anything except an exact copy of the first two games, stylistically or otherwise? Are those the only two options you...

I noticed they didn't say 'Fallout fans'. I really don't think they mean Fallout fans, but rather Bethesda fans. They've pretty much proven that they don't actually give a shit about fans of Fallout. All they care about is the lowest common denominator and fans who will ooohhh and aaahhh over...

But the TES mod tools had to be used to do that, right? If not for the mod tools being used to do that, nobody (other than the devs who put it there) would have been the wiser about the content because the removal of that piece of clothing was not featured in the actual game itself. The point...

Oh, but you know BS will just take this and try to make it out in damage control like "look we got banned lolz! see it proves the rabid fans are wrong and we're like you know totally hardkore and junk with the fallouts! we're still completely right in everything we do!" Jokes about...