G
Guest
Guest
they should make fallout 3 2d just like f2 and f3.they also should make it to where your a descendent to the brotherhood of steel.if u have any comments about this plz post them.
pyro
pyro
G
Guest
Guest
Thats cool, be a BOS, bur there are three tihngs iwant their put in game:
1)A perk ho make you alow to train beast like one of my messages board (Alien go for the legs...)
2)And like NOX , you can user your own tipe of clothes , like Green T-shirt , yeloow trouses, or skirt for wommen.
3)And multiplayer game into net , like battle.net,
whit a security agains hakkers.
1)A perk ho make you alow to train beast like one of my messages board (Alien go for the legs...)
2)And like NOX , you can user your own tipe of clothes , like Green T-shirt , yeloow trouses, or skirt for wommen.
3)And multiplayer game into net , like battle.net,
whit a security agains hakkers.
>they should make fallout 3 2d
>just like f2 and f3.they
>also should make it to
>where your a descendent to
>the brotherhood of steel.if u
>have any comments about this
>plz post them.
>
> pyro
Why do you want a 2d engine? Remember that 3d does not mean 1st or 3rd person. The game will have a 3/4 isometric view like the previous games had, but the possibilities would be a lot greater. For instance they could build in a camera rotation feature. Also all weapon and armor types would look different. You'd be able to distinguish a bozar from a turbo plasma rifle instead of seeing a generic big gun model.
>just like f2 and f3.they
>also should make it to
>where your a descendent to
>the brotherhood of steel.if u
>have any comments about this
>plz post them.
>
> pyro
Why do you want a 2d engine? Remember that 3d does not mean 1st or 3rd person. The game will have a 3/4 isometric view like the previous games had, but the possibilities would be a lot greater. For instance they could build in a camera rotation feature. Also all weapon and armor types would look different. You'd be able to distinguish a bozar from a turbo plasma rifle instead of seeing a generic big gun model.
G
Guest
Guest
I mean like diablo, if have played, you note that your wepons dont go when you stop playing, you can go play other day whit same level of experience and wepons, and when you are killed by other gamer you only loose your money , when is by a monster you loose all you have, could use these model of game, and put the town world, (Search in these forum for "Only Usa ? No lets put the full world" its my idea for game , but forget the full world and put only the full america, and whit the townworld can use red + for you and green + for others players, And for a fight this O and a ally war this A.
Did you even stop to think about the turnbased combat issue? Or the timecompression when you're traveling on the worldmap? Or the fact that fallout is a true RPG while diablo is a hack 'n slash game with RPG elements? How would they incorporate complex quests into the game? My guess is you haven't. I'd like to see multiplayer in fallout, but I'd want indepth roleplaying and not a crappy post-apocalyptic diablo clone.
G
Guest
Guest
My think for the game is not a reply of Diablo but a renovation, and their say that Fallout3 will e a nonturned game , a realtime, but if he be a turned game is alright to play it over Net, when you stop your turn, just apearin you opponet that you end , and if want to stop , could ask "Palyer 1 want to stop the fight. do you want too? Yes or NO ?
PS: You are not obricade to play over NET, you can choose to play only sigle game thats your personal choise , i thing that a multiplaye game make the games more cool and funny.
PS: You are not obricade to play over NET, you can choose to play only sigle game thats your personal choise , i thing that a multiplaye game make the games more cool and funny.
It seems like you're not getting my point. It's not that I don't WANT multiplayer. I just think it would be very hard to be done right. What you seem to miss is that there are a couple of serious problems to overcome when making the new sequel a multiplayer. If you hadn't noticed, Fallout is true a ROLE PLAYING GAME. It allows you to play your character the way you see fit. The most important thing about the game is not the combat, it's acting out the role of your character. If you would want to finish the first two fallouts by having a character relying on his speech skill and charisma, then you could.
Now, if you incorporate multiplayer into the game chances are the emphasis of the game would turn more towards combat and less to the roleplaying aspect. And if that happens fallout would turn into a shooter. I don't want that to happen, do you?
Now, if you incorporate multiplayer into the game chances are the emphasis of the game would turn more towards combat and less to the roleplaying aspect. And if that happens fallout would turn into a shooter. I don't want that to happen, do you?
G
Guest
Guest
Now i get to your point, its true, i will loose all th rgp if had a multi , maibei thei can make a other game whit, And name it FALLOUT the War, or thing, but the idea to havemulti tipes of clothes and be a animal trainer it would be cool, was good to disscut whit you .
RainMaker Brasil 12:11 AM.
RainMaker Brasil 12:11 AM.
G
Guest
Guest
that would be pretty cool but as long as they have the same view as last time i'll be happy.the clothes feature would be cool.animal would be cool to.so would multi player but the multi player take forever to make plus it would be extremly complex.now im a big fan of internet games such as diablo,tribes,uo,starcraft,and a few others.i didn't like the idea of all the hacking in diablo thats what ruins games.uo now i like there shard called abyss test with the color wars.if they made like diffrent shards like on uo that would be cool,and instead of traveling on the map just walk to where ya gotta go and as your walking maybe u will run into a deathclaw,or something.bothe of u had great points but there is always a downfall.
pyro
pyro