After end of game..

  • Thread starter Thread starter Red
  • Start date Start date
R

Red

Guest
Hey it'd be cool if the game changes a bit after the "end". In Fallout 2 the people in New Reno changed opinion about you. But the strange thing is that Arroyo wasn't rebuilt, NCR didn't welcome you aso. So dull. Though if they all kinda changed opinion about u and you'd get smaller tasks as caravan driver or something that leaves "every" day. Then it'd be FUN to continue playing.
And, oh, another thing, your char. should be able to get better even after the game (they should NOT put in a Fallout 3 hint book!), that kinda gives you a new goal that makes you wanna continue playing.
 
The rebuilding of Aroyyo is several years after FO2 ended and if Black Isle should have maked NCR welcome you and so on it would probably had been to big(BTW and then it couldn't be a story for a sequel). And about the Hint Book, you don't have to read right?
 
Kilroy

You're obviously not a true fallout player.
And you've got a lack of ideas.
 
RE: Kilroy

>You're obviously not a true fallout
>player.
>And you've got a lack of
>ideas.

Umm, would you mind telling me on what you're basing this assumption?
 
RE: Kilroy

Oh, man! Do I really have to tell you that?
Ok, u might have played Fallout but u obviously don't know what you're talking about. I mean, why would it be better if people that "enjoys" a game, can't get that chance to suck the most out of it. It's crap if you just ENDS the game and then it's all over. How enjoying is that. When you've been seated several hours in a row and finally finished the game, then it ends just like that. If u develop the options after the "actual" game, it'll be a lot more fun. But u obviously don't understand that, that's to bad. I don't care if you're a webmaster or whatever u call yourself. You should think first and talk after.
Thank you
 
Hmmm, nice attitude:

Goodbye.
You lost all chances here.
Strike whatever, that kind of attitude gets your ass kicked out the door.
 
RE: Hmmm, nice attitude:

Why do you guys have to be so ignorant?
It's amusing to see how some people work.
you're obviosly just looking for trouble.
By the way, I think you take it a bit to seriously.
 
RE: Hmmm, nice attitude:

>Why do you guys have to
>be so ignorant?
>It's amusing to see how some
>people work.
>you're obviosly just looking for trouble.
>
>By the way, I think you
>take it a bit to
>seriously.

Please read back your messages in this thread and ask yourself how you come across towards other people. Try to look at it from my perspective:

1) You're posting an idea about how you think the FO2 ending should have been.

2) Killroy gives you an explanation why it's not this way.

3) You accuse him of having a lack of ideas. An assumption that has absolutely no base because he didn't even post an idea (nor did he critisize yours).

4) I ask you on what you base your assumption and the reply I get is a hostile one defending your idea which by the way still no one critisized yet.

5) Then you tell me to think first and talk later. It seems to me you need to follow your own advice.

And as for Rosh wanting to ban you for this slip-up. I can't say I agree with that course of action. It's just that he can get pretty mad when people seem to turn hostile for no apparent reason.

Rosh: don't ban Red just yet. Let's first see what he has to say about this
 
Shadowman, read this link:

And then give me your thoughts.


http://fallout.gamestats.com/forum/index.cgi?az=show_thread&om=103&forum=ForumID5&omm=6

He's come onto this board with nothing but a shitty, challenging attitude. He accuses others of not thinking, yet I fail to see once where he has given serious thought in return.

If he still wants to cop an attitude towards anyone who replies to him and try to pick fights, then he has no place on this board.
 
I read it.

But I still don't think we should give him three strikes. A warning would be in order though.
 
RE: I read it.

Would ypu, regarding the circumstances, wnat to protect this Kilroy fella'? You blaim me for taking action agains critisism when in fact I did not. As I read his reply I could not see one point in his message where he did not critisise my ideas (weaved into his somewhat cryptical thoughts). I thought the point of this message board was to excange ideas not to tell people what to think!
His attitude seemes a bit like mine and I want to apologise for such brutal oral abuse, but I will not withdraw my ideas and belives in this matter.
maybe you protected "him" without really understanding my point of view. So it might be, that my formulations were somehwat hard to understand. But I will not accept to be attacked by some "guy" because of my ideas. Please reconsider youre aproach against your visitors and
toss ideas and thoughts between you and us, but never use youre stance for own benifit (as the ability to shut people out), it might just come back to you...
 
One more thing

Oh, and one more thing: the link you posted to one of my anouncements againtst a guy, that actually "critisised" another guy's ideas (you can clearly read this), is to be considered as a hostile action against me right?
 
RE: One more thing

Cutting through all the bullshit, I'll say this:
Your response to Kilroy was borderline.
Your response to Shadowman was unacceptable.
Your flames against me almost got your ass canned from the start.

I don't care how you can wax poetic against me to save your ass, the bottom line is you fucked up and now you are trying to either lay the blame elsewhere or excuse yourself. If you are going to turn so hostile if someone has opposing viewpoints on a matter, or expresses their own, then you must deal with the consequences, right? And if you can't take someone having such a different opinion without it turning into a flame war, then don't post at all.


>Please reconsider youre aproach against your
>visitors and toss ideas and thoughts between you
>and us, but never use youre stance for own
>benifit (as the ability to shut people out), it
>might just come back to you...


What? We sould be nice to those who flame like you have? I think not. And let me say right now, on behalf of all of us here, people who do the things you have get warned only twice. If that. For the things you have done, consider yourself lucky you have not been banned already.


And FYI: Before you take things out of context....well, take this with a grain of salt; learn to read english better.
 
RE: One more thing

Wooooow, now I'm pissed. i tried to be nice but you just won't stop writing your fucking shit. You don't take my apology and you just cuts out the bad parts. That's it. I'm gonna hack your page so bad you'll have one word left on this fucking page: up your fucking asses. Your loss, looser.
Oh and by the way my english i damn good, just look on the last tree rows. this is gonna be fun.
 
RE: One more thing

>Wooooow, now I'm pissed. i tried
>to be nice but you
>just won't stop writing your
>fucking shit. You don't take
>my apology and you just
>cuts out the bad parts.
>That's it. I'm gonna hack
>your page so bad you'll
>have one word left on
>this fucking page: up your
>fucking asses. Your loss, looser.

Thanks for the admission, monkeyboy. If we have any DoS attacks coming from The Royal Institute of Technology, I'll let the Swedish police know where you are. Oh yes....I have a record of every IP you used on this board, and beween the logs, of all those ISPs, there's enough evidence to convict. Plus anything you try against Gamestats will be logged.

>Oh and by the way my
>english i damn good, just
>look on the last tree
>rows. this is gonna be
>fun.

Right. Hooked-On-Phonics worked for you all right.... I can see that all too well....
 
Well, you can't say I haven't tried

Sorry man, you're gone. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
 
RE: Well, you can't say I haven't tried

Now Red if you start fucking around with this page, ill hunt you down like the dog you are. You sob
 
Red....this is GOD.....

What is going on in your head?
Please, speak to me, and I will make sure the men in funny white suits don't take you away.

Be well, my child....
 
RE: One more thing

SIE312's Sommelier Whine Rater Score System:

Please enter a value of 0-9

Coherence: 4
Content: 1
Effectiveness: 1
Originality: 1
Pertinence: 1
Readability: 1
Significance: 0
Solution: 0
Technical: 0
Value: 0

00-09- Classic Shakespearean Whine - Muling and Puking in his nurse's arms.
10-19- Of some significance... if you are under the age of eight...
20-29- Might have a good point if we could figure out what it is.
30-39- Are we both on the same topic?
40-49- Are we both on the same BBS?
50-59- Are we both on the same planet?
60-69- Low-Value whine. Vintage Ripple- 9AM
70-79- Standard restaurant house whine, uninteresting and insignificant.
80-89- A Classical vintage that could use some more maturing.
90-99- A truly excellent whine, with full body, significance and value.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top