Army Soldier Is Convicted In Attack on Fellow Troops

Silencer

Night Watchman
Staff member
Admin
from teh Washington Post

Hasan Akbar, who turned 34 yesterday, faces the death penalty for the killings at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait, which prosecutors said were carefully planned to achieve "maximum carnage." The jury, which deliberated for 2 1/2 hours at Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, N.C., before delivering its guilty verdicts on murder and attempted-murder charges, will reconvene Monday for a death-penalty hearing.

Both the prosecution and the defense said that Akbar -- who became a Muslim as an adult -- wanted to stop the soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division from killing Muslims. A defense lawyer argued that Akbar was mentally ill.

The accusation that Akbar was responsible for the attack struck an emotional chord in a military culture built around camaraderie and loyalty -- the "band of brothers" creed. Akbar is the first U.S. service member prosecuted on charges of murdering fellow troops in wartime since the Vietnam War era.

The attack jarred Camp Pennsylvania not long after 1 a.m. March 23, 2003, as members of the 101st Airborne Division, known as the "Screaming Eagles," were preparing to move from central Kuwait to Iraq. Grenades were rolled into several tents, setting off loud explosions, and shots were fired.

So, now you have to be mentally ill to launch a backstabbing assault on a military camp?

Too bad he didn't dress up in rags and do it the jee-had way. Lamer.

Still, too bad he chose to do what he did.

PS. Shouldn't the title read "For Attack" ?
 
Hey, if you dont have any defense line for your client, you use the "mentally ill" thing as a shield...

Used quite too often in Poland (although not "mentally" ill on most cases...
 
I'm glad that the courts don't buy the 'mentally ill' bullshit too often.

Maybe Michael Jackson will appeal after his conviction and use it as a defense? :lol:
 
Insanity is like,the last defence you can use.

Its like in a zombie movie when you run out of bullets and you grab a knife.

You dont really expect it to work,but you just have to try.

As far as i can understand the american judical system,12 jurors are randomly picked,and you need a 100% vote for either guilty or acquittal.

So really insanity is just to give the juror a reason to do the acquital.It doesnt matter if they really THINK the defendant is insane,what matters is they want to acquit him or convinct him.

In this case however,its just not going to fly.
 
Back
Top