K
Kilroy
Guest
You wrote: "Oh I'm sorry, were you trying to make a joke of this situation? Hijacking a plane and killing *anyone* except the hijackers, is not cause for celebration."
On my suggestion that if someone should hijack a plane they could at least kill Bush.
As I SAID: I DO NOT approve of terrorism. But I also do not like the USA. What's wrong with that? I DO NOT have anything against americans in general,I just don't like how things are governed over there. If you think that it "anti-american", you do so. I didn't write anything as a joke. Well, the Bush part maybe. When I wrote it I hadn't gotten the picture clear. We hadn't recieved all the available information and (at that moment) I thought it was much smaller than it really was.
>OK, no more irony right now.
>But I don't think that
>revenge is the best idea.
>I agree that the ones
>who are responsible for this
>should be punished, I just
>don't think that the SEAL's
>should go on a SAD
>mission for them. That just
>proves that (as the palistinians
>say it): the USA is
>the home of evil.
>For punishing who is involved? No, that's called justice.
No, for killing them without a fair trail. If you do something without thinking (like punishing someone just to punish them) people will think that you always react like that and they will loose respect.
>This
>could start WW3, so the
>yanks must be careful with
>what they do.
>Get real.
>This time
>it was an airplane, next
>time it could be a
>nuke.
>That's what the national missile defense system is supposed to >try help combat, at least from the air...
>And another nuke, and
>then Iraq and North Corea
>joins in.
>>action would prompt any kind of response from Iraq especially >since they don't have any capabilities ANYWAY.
They did shot down a spy plane didn't they? (OK it was unmanned and everything but it shows that they got the balls to do something)
>North Korea? What do they have to gain? Helping Afghanistan? >Puleeze. North Korea is moving more and more towards more >laxxed tensions with the USA and western nations. Why >jeopardize that for a nation like Afghanistan?
>Then the UK
>must help USA and then
>China must help North Corea
>etc etc.
>China help North Korea? Get real. Where is their interest in >that? China is more involved in trade and alliances with the >western powers than any other non-NATO nation on the planet. >Why start a war with the world because some small nation like >North Korea starts one, if they start one at all?
OK, some of it made no sense. I just wanted to paint a picture of what would happen if all of the USA's enemies would team up against the US. I just tried to warn you. Violence i´sn't always the best answer.
>Next thing we
>have a full scale Fallout
>scenario. This might seem "cool"
>when it's a game but
>I for one don't want
>to live in a fallout
>shelter all my life.
>No one is disagreeing with you on that.
>My
>grandmother lived in Helsinki, Finland
>during WW2 and she has
>told me about tjose terrifying
>hours in a bomb shelter.
>Yeah, so?
That "tagged along" with the message above. I mean that I know people that has been in a bomb shelter when th bombs were falling and that I myself don't think it seems like a great thing.
And as I said, (and always do) enough with the irony. If someone doesn't like what I do because it's tacky, I will stop. Like I did with the irony part.
[div align=center]
http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
http://fallout.gamestats.com/forum/User_files/3a73d53c60e9b786.jpg
"The frogurt is also cursed."
"Call me a vagabond, and I'll smile. Call me a thief, and I'll laugh. Call me a liar, and I feed you your liver."
On my suggestion that if someone should hijack a plane they could at least kill Bush.
As I SAID: I DO NOT approve of terrorism. But I also do not like the USA. What's wrong with that? I DO NOT have anything against americans in general,I just don't like how things are governed over there. If you think that it "anti-american", you do so. I didn't write anything as a joke. Well, the Bush part maybe. When I wrote it I hadn't gotten the picture clear. We hadn't recieved all the available information and (at that moment) I thought it was much smaller than it really was.
>OK, no more irony right now.
>But I don't think that
>revenge is the best idea.
>I agree that the ones
>who are responsible for this
>should be punished, I just
>don't think that the SEAL's
>should go on a SAD
>mission for them. That just
>proves that (as the palistinians
>say it): the USA is
>the home of evil.
>For punishing who is involved? No, that's called justice.
No, for killing them without a fair trail. If you do something without thinking (like punishing someone just to punish them) people will think that you always react like that and they will loose respect.
>This
>could start WW3, so the
>yanks must be careful with
>what they do.
>Get real.
>This time
>it was an airplane, next
>time it could be a
>nuke.
>That's what the national missile defense system is supposed to >try help combat, at least from the air...
>And another nuke, and
>then Iraq and North Corea
>joins in.
>>action would prompt any kind of response from Iraq especially >since they don't have any capabilities ANYWAY.
They did shot down a spy plane didn't they? (OK it was unmanned and everything but it shows that they got the balls to do something)
>North Korea? What do they have to gain? Helping Afghanistan? >Puleeze. North Korea is moving more and more towards more >laxxed tensions with the USA and western nations. Why >jeopardize that for a nation like Afghanistan?
>Then the UK
>must help USA and then
>China must help North Corea
>etc etc.
>China help North Korea? Get real. Where is their interest in >that? China is more involved in trade and alliances with the >western powers than any other non-NATO nation on the planet. >Why start a war with the world because some small nation like >North Korea starts one, if they start one at all?
OK, some of it made no sense. I just wanted to paint a picture of what would happen if all of the USA's enemies would team up against the US. I just tried to warn you. Violence i´sn't always the best answer.
>Next thing we
>have a full scale Fallout
>scenario. This might seem "cool"
>when it's a game but
>I for one don't want
>to live in a fallout
>shelter all my life.
>No one is disagreeing with you on that.
>My
>grandmother lived in Helsinki, Finland
>during WW2 and she has
>told me about tjose terrifying
>hours in a bomb shelter.
>Yeah, so?
That "tagged along" with the message above. I mean that I know people that has been in a bomb shelter when th bombs were falling and that I myself don't think it seems like a great thing.
And as I said, (and always do) enough with the irony. If someone doesn't like what I do because it's tacky, I will stop. Like I did with the irony part.
[div align=center]
http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
http://fallout.gamestats.com/forum/User_files/3a73d53c60e9b786.jpg
"The frogurt is also cursed."
"Call me a vagabond, and I'll smile. Call me a thief, and I'll laugh. Call me a liar, and I feed you your liver."
