>OK, thanks Xotor. I got my
>answers. Almost, what about the
>italian soldiers that died from
>leucemia(?) in Bosnia. How do
>you explain that?
In addition to depleted uranium shells having very high concentrations of radioactive material, when a U238 shell hits its target, it becomes searing hot, effectively melting the armor as the incredible mass of the shell penetrates the armor. That burning uranium results in very fine radioactive particles to enter the air. And because these are the pure radioactive particles themselves, not just some radiated dirt, they're more deadly and stay radioactive longer.
I also expect that these italian soldiers were probably sticking around for quite a while right? Probably close to the radioactive bullets and shells that are scattered about. I doubt anyone has made it their job to pick up the bullets, correct? So more exposure, the more damage, especially considering these bullets don't lose their radiation as quickly as, say, radiated dirt from a ground-impacting nuclear bomb (airbursts produce little noticable fallout).
>And I
>never questioned your theorys about
>nuclear weapons I just wanted
>to hear what you thought
>about the Gulf War syndrome.
The thing you have to remember is that there are higher concentration of radioactive materials laying around than what you get from a fallout. Also, the radioactivity doesn't fallout off as quickly as it does from a fallout (after two weeks it is usually safe to exit a fallout shelter).
><<>Hey guys, I think I finally
>>got him. Just like I
>>put a very big hole
>>in Yamu's theories. j/k
>
>Don't be so sure..>>
>
>Didn't you see the smiley and
>the j/k?
Well it's just kind of funny how people seem to make it their goal to "top" me...
-Xotor-
[div align=center]
http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]