welsh
Junkmaster
Has anyone seen it? The story is apocalyptic, playing on the theme of infertility and inability to reproduce.
This concept has also been used in Margaret Atwood's Handmaiden's Tale and Frank Herbert's The White Plague.
What did you think?
Great Cast. Reviewers seem to like it.
Review from Rolling Stone-
Children of Men
Starring: Clive Owen, Julianne Moore, Charlie Hunnam, Michael Caine, Gary Oldman
Directed by: Alfonso Cuaron
RS: 3.5of 4 Stars Average User Rating: 3.5of 4 Stars
2006 Universal Pictures All Movies
One of the pleasures of modern movies is watching an artist like Alfonso Cuarón at work. His Y Tu Mamá También is easily the most erotic explosion of the new decade and he made the only Harry Potter flick (The Prisoner of Azkaban) that found darkness and depth beneath the gloss. In the spellbinding Children of Men, his best film to date, Cuarón, 46, fills every frame with his passion and intellect. Here’s a movie that grabs you hard, pops your eyes, provokes your mind and ultimately lifts your spirits. As director and co-writer, Cuarón, born in Mexico City, takes on a 1992 novel by P.D. James set in 2027 in battle-battered Britain, the only country left to soldier on in the face of massive terrorism, immigrant invasion and global infertility (no child has been born since 2009). The death of Baby Diego, at eighteen the youngest living person, has caused a period of national mourning.
Hope is the first casualty among survivors, who include Theo (Clive Owen), a former activist playing out his days as a bureaucrat for the Ministry of Energy. Owen’s powerfully implosive performance lets us see past the barriers Theo has erected around his emotions. Theo is a shell of a man until his former lover, Julian (Julianne Moore), begs him to help the Fishes, underground rebels dedicated to aiding refugees, called "fugees," who are regularly captured, tortured and kept in cages. Since Theo and Julian share the sorrow of having had a son who died, Theo agrees to slip a fugee named Kee (the remarkable newcomer Clare-Hope Ashitey) past the police to find safety with the utopian Human Project. But when Kee’s secret is revealed -- she’s eight months pregnant -- she and everyone who sides with her become a target for special-interest groups of conflicting and sometimes lethal motives.
Those motives can be maddeningly unclear at times. But a second viewing, which Children of Men richly rewards, deepens our understanding. Cuarón, invoking shattered landscapes from Beirut to Baghdad, is dedicated to locating shards of humanity among the ruins. That he does, not just in the person of Jasper (a hilarious and heartbreaking Michael Caine), a former political cartoonist now devoted to weed, rap music and sticking it to the system, but in the small details that measure what our planet has lost. Is it possible to capture the terrible absence of a world without children? Cuarón does it. His chief collaborator is director of photography Emmanuel Lubezki, a weaver of visual miracles. No movie in the last year is more redolent of sorrowful beauty and exhilarating action. You don’t just watch the scene -- shot with a hand-held camera -- in which Theo, Kee and other passengers jammed in a car with them are attacked from all sides, you live inside it, ducking each fresh, ferocious assault. The technique disappears to envelop you in the moment. That’s Cuarón’s magic.
I’m not usually one for political fables that include symbols such as a ship called Tomorrow. But Cuarón has a gift only the greatest filmmakers share: He makes you believe.
PETER TRAVERS
(Posted: Dec 28, 2006)
So your thoughts?
What do you think would happen if, slowly, mankind discovered that it could no longer reproduce the species?