Dirty war- hbo and pbs

welsh

Junkmaster
Some of you might know, but HBO has a program on the possibility of a terrorist plot involving a Dirty Bomb on London.

Sorry it wasn't posted earlier.

Has anyone seen it? I caught bits but haven't seen the whole things. It airs tonight on PBS-

spoilers-

HBO's Dirty War aims to rattle our complacency

By Paul Brownfield
Los Angeles Times
Posted January 26 2005

Dirty War

Airs: 9 p.m. Thursday, 4:50 a.m. Friday on HBO

HBO's Dirty War depicts to convincing effect a terrorist bombing at rush hour in central London. Killing scores of people, it sends a billowing cloud of toxic smoke over a city only partially equipped to deal with the chaotic aftermath.

Could it happen here? I don't mean another terrorist event -- I mean a movie that seeks to rattle us out of a complacent belief that the terrorism front is exclusively "over there" now (Iraq, Afghanistan, Madrid, Istanbul) and not also on the verge of happening again in our own back yard.

To that end, Dirty War, a co-production with the BBC, argues that what we don't know will hurt us, and soon. It means to rattle and awaken awareness about the so-called "war on terror" in the way that The Day After, the 1983 TV movie about a nuclear holocaust in the United States, sought to get viewers thinking harder about the implications of the Cold War nukes race. Dirty War is this kind of cautionary tale, although not as catastrophic; it's about the shadowy ways in which terrorist cells operate and how elusive the enemy is to those charged with protecting us.

In this way, Dirty War leads us to the edge of our fears about another 9-11. You will feel things watching Dirty War -- dread, certainly, and anger perhaps at the ways in which a government is shown keeping its people blissfully in the dark, but Dirty War doesn't go beyond showing what can happen, and how.

It's well-executed but almost too clinical. "Based on extensive factual research," as the film announces, Dirty War takes viewers inside the week leading up to the explosion of a "dirty bomb" -- low-grade radioactive material dispersed by a conventional explosive -- during morning rush hour. As it cuts back and forth among various worlds, the film juxtaposes the resolve and efficiency of a clandestine network of Islamic extremists with the frustrations and squabbling among authorities trying to catch a remarkably unseen enemy.

Dirty War begins with a botched emergency services drill, one whose failure doesn't prevent the minister of London (Helen Schlesinger) from spinning it as proof of London being equipped to handle a terrorist act -- a pronouncement that enrages a fire chief (Alastair Galbraith). Meanwhile, a Jordanian militant (William El-Gardi) is moving toward the final stages of a suicide plot. Over at Scotland Yard, two detectives in the antiterrorism unit (Koel Purie and Martin Savage) are piecing together the various tentacles of the terrorist operation.

Reduced to a description of its plot elements, Dirty War sounds a lot more boilerplate than it actually is. In fact, the film, directed by Daniel Percival and co-written with Lizzie Mickery, builds with a gravity rarely undermined by cheesy dialogue, a typical trap of this kind of piece. Rather, the details of the unfolding event provide the film's momentum and, ultimately, the horrifyingly convincing nature of its outcome.

PBS will air Dirty War Feb. 23, though a brief scene of frontal nudity during a decontamination scrub-down scene will be excised from the broadcast. A PBS official said the network didn't want to risk an indecency fine from the Federal Communications Commission, no doubt a pragmatic move but also a strange argument given how far from sexualized the moment is.

More news and info-
From Center for Disease Control-
cdc comments

from council on foreign relations-
CFR's web page on dirty bombs

from nuclear regulatory commission-
nrc fact sheet

and an older program from NOVA-
NOVA "dirty bomb' web site
 
I seem to remember hearing about this a while ago (I think it's already been shown by the Beeb) but I didn't watch it. Somebody let me know if it's any good.

This made me laugh though:
PBS will air Dirty War Feb. 23, though a brief scene of frontal nudity during a decontamination scrub-down scene will be excised from the broadcast. A PBS official said the network didn't want to risk an indecency fine from the Federal Communications Commission, no doubt a pragmatic move but also a strange argument given how far from sexualized the moment is.
Stupid American censorship laws.
*Chuckle*
 
It's pretty cool. The HBO version had shaved beaver, and a really hot Pakistani chick (not nude though).

Pretty grim picture, but I think it gives the Terrorists more of a James Body feel then they deserve, as they are not the brightest bunch generally.
 
The film does highlight the danger of underestimating them like that though. It's pretty well made.
 
Fez said:
The film does highlight the danger of underestimating them like that though. It's pretty well made.
Yes, VERY well done.

Evidence?
In fact, evidence either way?
When being trained in Florida to fly, reports indicate that all of them where hard of learning and intellegence, and generally where semi-literate.
That's Madrassa education for you
 
John Uskglass said:
Evidence?
In fact, evidence either way?
When being trained in Florida to fly, reports indicate that all of them where hard of learning and intellegence, and generally where semi-literate.
That's Madrassa education for you
So, from a rather small group of examples you judge a potentially huge group of people?

Just because the 9/11 (or 11/09) terrorists were poorly educated you assume that all terrorists will be?
I refer you to Fez's post ("the danger of underestimating them like that").

(I am assuming that you are talking about them, if not, then my mistake - but you should be more specific)
 
Just because the 9/11 (or 11/09) terrorists were poorly educated you assume that all terrorists will be?
I refer you to Flop's post.
They are not particularly poorly educated; generally terrorists are chosen from the Middle Class, generally with people who have spent a large amount of time in the west yet not been able to succed in it. However, they tend to not be as *inventive* as in Dirty War.

And they tend to be very, very, VERY thinck headed. Think me with a plate of steel over my head.
 
Flop, lewl, comedy gold.

Assuming everyone is less intelligent than yourself is the road to disaster. Never underestimate an enemy. Too many times people have thought that the "dirty sand people", or other racial and social subgroups, would not be capable of cunning or clever and complex planning. They are inevitably shown to be wrong when they get a kick in the pants from the "lesser" people.

Also, you gloss over the point that those few unintelligent people managed to wipe out thousands of American people, the two towers and two planes. Not bad work for people who are "very, very, thick headed".

This only proves that intelligence isn't a requirement to hurt America, or you have underestimated them. I suspect the latter, but either way the point is moot.

Currently we've been lucky the terrorists have mostly used suicide bombers in one form or another, mainly due to the cost effectiveness of them. Once they decide to use less obvious attacks the only time you'll find out is when it's all over and on the news.
 
Back
Top