G
Guest
Guest
So whats wrong with Fallout being 3D? Absoulty nothing,. its sitll going to be form the same view point, its still going to let you control your character in the same manner as you always have...You can't possibly think they they should make Fallout 3 wiht 256 colors and 640 x 480 resolution,. no of course you don't that would just be thoughtless...anywhoo, now this is why I think this is a good idea. If they do decide to implement the new rotatable camera this will alow for more exlporation of the Fallout world, no longer will you be bound to what has been pre-drawn, no you will be able to approach the enviroment from the point of view that you want, this ocld also be used for puzzles or for more realalism,. maybe you have to go behind buildings and turn the camera around to see that there is a small boy hiding in the shadows or somthing along those lines, maybe some kind of switch of hidden entrance, the things that can be done with this are pretty cool...also I bet some ppl are already saying that "this isnt Fallout" (tm)...well it is, its still a post apoclyptic world, with a heavy 50s influence, with a very good story, and very developed RPG system, all that has changed is that the medium in which you view the Fallout World, and nothing is wrong with that...sure it could suck if they do it half assed, but than again so could another Fallout 3 with the same engine as Fallout 1 & 2, so don't get all hysterical just because they have decided to give the game a face lift, I am an aritst, and a games design and graphical appeal/style is very important too me, just as much as the story or anything else for that matter.
-Morphix My .40 Rubul
Just to recap, Stale and Old graphics are bad, Fallout Universe good!
-Morphix My .40 Rubul
Just to recap, Stale and Old graphics are bad, Fallout Universe good!