Fallout Bible 0 discrepancy?

[rknirmal]

I was reading the first Fallout Bible and near the end I think, it was talking about how the Enclave had stormed Vault 13 and captured all the inhabitants and killed three that were rebelling.
Well, at the very end of the Fallout 2 movie, all I saw were some vault dwellers waving to the Enclave troops before they opened fire with their miniguns at them. If waving at someone constitues "resistance", then my world is completely upside down.

 

[Tannhauser]

Less than a day later, Vault 13 is opened, only to be greeted by two Enclave verti-assault squads. The squads kill three of the citizens who were "resisting capture," and storm the Vault, kidnapping all the inhabitants.

This is too hard to understand?

 

[rknirmal]

Look, in the F2 intro, you see the Vault door being opened and a couple of its citizens coming out to see the Enclave troops and their vertibirds. They wave and then the troops fire, I don't think waving to someone is "resisting" ya dig?

 

[Tannhauser]

Apparently it is too hard.

See the quotation marks around "resisting capture?" Why do you think those marks are there? Perhaps those words don't represent a literal truth? Perhaps you should not take them at face value? Maybe even, and this is a stretch of the imagination I know, it represents a specific group's biased description of the event.

 

[Lazarus Plus]

Apparently it is too hard.

See the quotation marks around "resisting capture?" Why do you think those marks are there? Perhaps those words don't represent a literal truth? Perhaps you should not take them at face value? Maybe even, and this is a stretch of the imagination I know, it represents a specific group's biased description of the event.

Wait, I don't "get it".

It's tempting to compile a list of things wrong with the Bible (partially or totally) but that would be a lot of work. Probably rivaling the Bible itself.

 

[rknirmal]

Apparently it is too hard.

See the quotation marks around "resisting capture?" Why do you think those marks are there? Perhaps those words don't represent a literal truth? Perhaps you should not take them at face value? Maybe even, and this is a stretch of the imagination I know, it represents a specific group's biased description of the event.

Yay! I discovered I'm retarded!

 

[Ausir]

It's tempting to compile a list of things wrong with the Bible (partially or totally) but that would be a lot of work. Probably rivaling the Bible itself.

Well, at The Vault we try to list all Fallout Bible mistakes in relevant articles.

Anyway, while the Fallout Bible might have not been perfect and it was far from what it was supposed to be, it did reveal some interesting tidbits about the Fallout Universe (or made more popular - how many people really used the name "Mariposa" for the Military Base before FOB or figured the Vault Experiment out?). The FO1 design docs were also great. Sure, it would be great if it didn't turn into a series of Q&A instead of a Fallout encyclopedia, but still it wasn't as bad as some think.