Fallout3...hmmm...Brilliant idea!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
If it`s gonna be like Fallout n Fallout2,I mean same 2d engine but bigger map,more weapons,more npcs,more unique items(like a crossbow or an armor of medievel age-when you wear it,it ll decrease your aps by 1 or 2-all suggestions...),and more characterization(may be play as a mutant/ghoul/cyborg-all suggestions...)
BUT I insist same engine n funny details with lots of easter eggs.Just to keep the old fans happy...I think.No playin dumb or jerkin,these r just my OPINIONS.
 
It's not going to be like fallout 2.

Well, not in the way you described anyway. Black Isle representatives have said many times that if they're going to make fallout 3 they will use a 3d engine. The 3/4 isometric view will stay the same however.

Also a lot of the old fans, the ones who also played fallout 1, don't want more eastereggs, they want less. Fallout 3 should have a much darker atmosphere with less humor like it was in fallout 1. The amount of humor used in fallout 2 was overkill. You're supposed to be playing a game in a cold violent apocalyptic world, but all the pop-culture references made it feel like it wasn't. Now a few easter-eggs would be ok, but not as many as in FO2.
 
RE: It's not going to be like fallout 2.

>Also a lot of the old
>fans, the ones who also
>played fallout 1, don't want
>more eastereggs, they want less.
>Fallout 3 should have a
>much darker atmosphere with less
>humor like it was in
>fallout 1. The amount of
>humor used in fallout 2
>was overkill. You're supposed to
>be playing a game in
>a cold violent apocalyptic world,
>but all the pop-culture references
>made it feel like it
>wasn't. Now a few easter-eggs
>would be ok, but not
>as many as in FO2.


Agreed.

Fo1 had a couple of South Park jokes.
Fo2 was like playing a South Park game, in some aspects.
 
RE: It's not going to be like fallout 2.

i don't think there should be any eastereggs, it also needs less weapons & ammo everywhere.
it's too easy to get guns & ammo, it should be a really big deal
 
RE: It's not going to be like fallout 2.

Question :
Is this about fallout 3 ? Or the next fallout (F:T)?

In the first case this shouldn't be here.
In the second case :
You are part of the BoS.
They have loads of weapons.
So getting hold of a weapon shouldn't be a problem.
 
1. The medieval armor would make no sense in the world of Fallout. If any pieces of medieval armor did exist and were found, they wouldnt be very useful since metal rusts over time and I dont think that any sort of medieval armor was actually transported to SoCal...

2. The easter eggs in FO2, while funny, did detract from the general mood and atmosphere of the game. If Fallout 3 is to be any better than its predeccesors BIS should work on making the mood even darker if possible.

3. Crossbows sound good but they would be rather pointless when you consider the guns the raiders use in random encounters...the reload time on a crossbow is slower than the reload time on an SMG ...by the time you reload the raider using an SMG on burst setting will be the proud owner of some human Swiss cheese...
 
I know its the Fo Tactics board but I couldnt HELP but answer the damn question LOL

Sorry for seeming illiterate...
 
Or rather...

>
>>Also a lot of the old
>>fans, the ones who also
>>played fallout 1, don't want
>>more eastereggs, they want less.
>>Fallout 3 should have a
>>much darker atmosphere with less
>>humor like it was in
>>fallout 1. The amount of
>>humor used in fallout 2
>>was overkill. You're supposed to
>>be playing a game in
>>a cold violent apocalyptic world,
>>but all the pop-culture references
>>made it feel like it
>>wasn't. Now a few easter-eggs
>>would be ok, but not
>>as many as in FO2.
>
>
>Agreed.
>
>Fo1 had a couple of South
>Park jokes.
>Fo2 was like playing a South
>Park game, in some aspects.

Or rather Monty Python. As if those jokes aren't cliché enough.

-Xotor-

[div align=center]

http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]
 
Back
Top