RE: DatMan
>First: Sorry for my English. I
>just study.
Hmm, I got to ask sorry too because I think I over-exalted the topic and I think I was too aggressive.
Sorry
(wow, admins commits mistakes, too!)
>I`m looking your DatMan. VB -
>It not the wise decision.
>C is faster language.
New versions of the VB compiler has the same speed than C , the thing is that the DatMan engine was not correctly built up, so, the loading time of the DAT may be higher, but the exploration features are a lot faster than DAT Explorer.
>My Explorer extract patch000.dat for 6
>sec.
>But your DatMan for 9 sec.
Yeah... If I quit the stupid progress bar it took from 2 to 3 seconds less to extract a whole DAT.
By the way, your Explorer takes 60 seconds to load the Critters.dat unique folder, while DatMan takes 15 seconds.
So, mathematically, DatMan is 4 times faster than DAT Explorer.
DatMan's size is 196kb, while Explorer's 700kb (almost 1mb!).
And Explorer has a bug while trying to extract to root folders (C:\, for example), it says "Cannot create output file".
>My program too is able creaing
>DAT , but I not
>wish insert it.
I continue thinking that the ResDat package is better, no offence intended.