http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7267.shtml
Well, doesn't that just explain a few things.
Well, doesn't that just explain a few things.
Joachim said:He is on a lot of legitimate topics so I say keep him, he hasn't directly killed any of us yet
Joachim said:What? just about every other president ended up killing us and iraq is more of a way of pissing us off than killing us
Malkavian said:I hate Bush as much as the next guy, however I can't help but question the legitimacy of that article and it's source.
Joachim said:well I don't mean like ran up to someone shot him in the head and just said it was a political indifference that had gone wrong. but I mean like just sent us to a war that we lost 3/4 of our army kinda, forget about me saying the whole directly-indirectly thing. Truthfully I think Bush going to Iraq is one of four things 1. to get the oil there but there have been no oil records there up to date except the one about a huge pipe being built there, that the workers refused to do? can't verify on that. 2. he made up the weapons of mass destructions and osama bin laden just to attempt to show himself as someone trying to save our lives and stop the terrorists, but that wouldn't be working too well. 3. He still has the receipt for the weapons of mass destruction 4. because he knows that if he attacked iraq he would get attacked by terrorists but not the worst so he's using it as kind of a..trial to prepare america for the real deal (saudi arabia or wherever they are all coming from)