Skill Improvements... (Intelligent Improved Version)

[Guest]

I would like to state conforming to accepted standards at the present time that there will be one tag attractiveness and height instead of three for these few, specific adeptness at complementing the boss. So you can see that increasingly a geographic dimension is unavoidable in scope determination.

As I and others can see from Fallout two, Big Guns in addition to Energy Weapons were vastly pathetic. The energy weapons did nothing to those tough Highly developed Surging force Armors in addition to Big Guns had in addition specific utilizes in addition to ammo was also scarce to employ all the non-spatial continuum. This is of central importance to strategic management because it can either buttress or inhibit our commitment to excellence. Minuscule Guns were overpowered in comparison to these tool set. I suggest that these three adeptness at complementing the boss all become one attractiveness and height, known as simply: "Guns". It makes sense, if you think about it. All guns are extremely much correlative. They have a barrel, a loading chamber, a ceasing to employ ignition mode of operation, a trigger, a handle, an ammo chamber, etc. Gun operation in addition to gunshooting accuracy in addition to speed would be extremely similar. If you are extremely knowledgable in the subdivisions of a Sniper Rifle in addition to can cease to employ it with supreme accuracy in addition to have knowledge of in what way not to break it in addition to etc. , then it would make sense that you would have decent attribute in using a Pulse Rifle, as skillfully. In spite of the fact that I do think the amusement activity mode of operation could be a diminutive bit varied if your attribute in a particular WEAPON is determined by in what way often you have used it, sort of like in Dungeon Siege, exclusively it would be weapon type specific, for representation, increasing you Guns attractiveness and height will make you superior with guns in addition to material, but obviously if you have ceased to employ a Plasma rifle 1000 non-spatial continuums in addition to a Pulse rifle 0 non-spatial continuums, you should have slighlty superior capability with the Plasma in addition to not the Pulse, in light of the fact that they vary slightly in addition to aiming concerns in addition to reloading techniques are varied and numerous.
In summation, we must be specifically focused on a crucial, complex, and creative task: turning knowledge and learning acquired as part of ongoing environmental and organizational analysis into the specification of potential opportunities and threats.

To sum it all up, I supposition I would just like to aver the diversion activity needs:
- Multiple similar adeptness at complementing the boss converted into one adeptness at complementing the boss. And of course, the determination of scope, posture and goals involves a plethora of decisions that require many types of analytical input about multiple facets of the competitive context.
- one Tag tool set instead of three to complement this rejuvenated mode of operation
- Experience in a gun modifies your accuracy with that one weapon (Example: the pipe rifle you find in Vic's shack)
- Experience in a gun modifies your accuracy with all optional weapons with the same nomenclature (Example: alll 14mm pistols)
- Experience in a gun modifies your accuracy with all optional weapons with the same weapon sub-type (Example: all shotguns)
- Experience in a gun modifies your accuracy with all optional weapons with the same weapon type (Example: all minuscule guns)

Of course the less in addition to less correlative a weapon is it to the one you have been using, the less of an experience adeptness at complementing the boss frequently heard of but seldom seen incentive you gain. So if you utilize a pipe rifle, your sniper rifle attractiveness and heights will aggrandize more than your minigun tool set. As you can see, this will require disintermediation in order for us to maintain dynamically continuous innovation.


Tell me if you got a kick from this...



"Acquire culinary assets lead, chop shop boy!" - Chosen One
All hail Lord Phrog, #one fan in addition to veteran of Fallout series..

 

[Guest]

Well, i disagree with you on the making 1 guns catagory. The guns skill isnt only being able to know how to fire a gun etc. For example, the Big Guns skill not only covers how to pull the trigger, but also how to hold big guns, adjust for recoil etc. The point is, firing a rifle compared to another rifle or a shotgun or something is very similar, but firing a rocket launcher or minigun is very different.

 

[Gunslinger]

The game requires a classification of three catorgories, though even that is stretching it considering that there a myriad of different weapon "classes". The aptly named Big Guns skill contains not only miniguns but also implements of explosive death in the cliched form of the generic "rocket launcher", a vast difference in both. The Small Guns skill not only packs semi-automatic handguns but also full-auto burst assault rifles, another vast difference in both. The Energy Weapon is the only category that conforms to its name, which is a weapon that fires energey (duh ). What I'm trying to say is that even three weapon categories isn't enough to differentiate the multiple weapons in Fallout. Just placing on the ranged firing weapons in one category and calling it "Guns" because they all do the same effect is a wide stretch.

Example:
The performance of a Rocekt Propelled Grenade is completely different compared to a handgun. For the RPG, you would have to load it by setting the firing tube down and then screwing in the rotors into the grenade and sliding it into the firing tube. For the handgun, you merely slip a magazine into the clip and pull back the slide to ready your next shot. The RPG has good 8-10 pound pull on its trigger whereas the handgun has a sensitive pull that is often required for semi-automated guns. Then there is the fact that the RPG is heavier, fires farther, but has a slower rate of fire. So, in summation, both guns have a different weight, rate of fire, and loading procedure. So if there was a tribal who has never seen ANY type of gun except for the one he specializes in, say the handgun, would he truly know how to fire the RPG? Vice versa. He may have a rough idea but he would shoot poorly if he just performs according to his prior experience with the handgun.

-Courtesy of a Future Member of the NRA

"Credo Ut Intelligam"- I believe so that I may understand.

 

[Guest]

I kinda liked his experience ideas with specific guns. It would be pretty cool that through experince, you get better shots with it, cause thats true in the real world also. The subtypes etc is kinda pushing it, but i say that the more experience you have with a gun, the better you should shoot with it (maybe even after a LOT of experience with it you get a master rank with it, kinda like a mini-sniper perk for that specific gun, or less AP to shoot or somthing.

 

[Guest]

[font size=1" color="#FF0000]LAST EDITED ON Nov-25-02 AT 04:30AM (GMT)[p]What I meant was automatically slightly improved accuracy in addition to/or damage. But, this paradigm as I've described it above, as a set of assumptions and beliefs more or less collectively owned, is likely to be inseparable from the web of cultural artifacts specific to the organization. Based on microscopic percentages. Possibly if you utilize one gun to kill everything in the entire diversion activity by the non-spatial continuum you rendezvous Franky you'll have expertly 2-3x accuracy in addition to/or damage depending on in what way much of the high-tech amusement activity you play in addition to in what way merciless you are importantly to your prey

"Eat lead, chop shop boy!" - Chosen One
All hail Lord Phrog, #1 fan and veteran of Fallout series.

 

[Gunslinger]

Your suggestion gives rise to balance implications. Have you every played those first person RPGs like Morrowind or the Wizardry series? Those games implemented a statistical raise dependant on the frequency or lack of frequency you used those skills, breaking the mold from other RPGs that allow you to increase skills only when you "level up". A good, wholesome idea. But there are always hardcore gamers who'll just abuse the system to make their uber-characters. Example: For the Wizardry series, your lockpick skill gets higher as you pick open more and more locks. But there's also an option to close the lock. So some enterprising hardcore gamer just planted himself in front of one lock, picked it, locked it up again, and then picked it over again. Rinse and repeat. You end up with a character with ridiculous lock picking skill just by picking the same darn ol' lock over again.

So, there will always be folks who'll utilize their insistent minds to pick apart every friggin' single aspect of the game. If you become more powerful from just using guns as you suggest, there'll be one guy who stands in front of a wall and bursts away all his ammunition so his stats go up. There will either be the true gamer who doesn't exploit the game and get more poweful by training with the same gun and there'll be the hardcore guy who just pumps his stats by abusing the sytem.

"Credo Ut Intelligam"- I believe so that I may understand.

 

[Guest]

It doesnt matter how the skill system is, players will exploit it. Look at Neverwinter Nights. They had a GREAT idea in letting players make modules to play on, adding huge replayability, but then you get the people that make trainer modules. Doesnt really matter how you gain more skills, cause people will be lamers and just level up forever instead of really roleplaying their characters.