Time Magazine Cover

[Ozrat]

Yes, as some of you may know, I posted this in the middle of another thread in tO, but most of you GDF folks will never notice it there, sooo....

If you haven't seen it yet, here's the newest edition of Time Magazine:

Source

Freaky coincidence from an innocent blunder, or is the photographer pulling a fast one? You decide.

And if you don't know what I'm talking about, just stare at the picture and try to associate it with one of the most infamous images on the net.

Buy a copy and frame it today!

 

[SuAside]

lol

i dont remember seeing clouds though :p

 

[Jebus]

i dont remember seeing clouds though :p

Try looking at it harder. You'll see them after a while.

 

[Macaco]

i believe he would have to open his mouth if you were too see any clouds.

 

[Briosafreak]

I saw it at DAC, this beats the UT2004 door at one of the levels. Cool, in a post-modern and derranged kind of way.

 

[Tannhauser]

Bah! Stealing my "...how modern." comment from Duck and Cover I see.

Is there no depth of depravity you won't sink to Briosafreak?

 

[Briosafreak]

I said post-modern, that proves i`m no thief :moon:

 

[welsh]

Damn Ozrat, this brings back uncomfortable memories of when the "who's sexy thread" went wrong.

 

[Wooz]

It was wrong since the beggining.

No nipples, no nudity, no fun.

 

[Ozrat]

Damn Ozrat, this brings back uncomfortable memories of when the "who's sexy thread" went wrong.

I admit that I was the preliminary cause leading up to that, but the goatse itself was adminstrator approved and implemented.

Totally forgot all about that, though.