Vote for Change Concert Tour

welsh

Junkmaster
Back in the 1980s Reagan took Born in the USA as an anthem, a move which pissed off Springstein. It was a bad choice considering the song is about job loss, economic decline, and forgotten US servicemen and the wars they fight. Although Springstein has kept out of politics, he's finally made a decision to join this tour.

What do you think?

Chords for Change
By Bruce Springsteen
The New York Times

Thursday 05 August 2004

A nation's artists and musicians have a particular place in its social and political life. Over the years I've tried to think long and hard about what it means to be American: about the distinctive identity and position we have in the world, and how that position is best carried. I've tried to write songs that speak to our pride and criticize our failures.

These questions are at the heart of this election: who we are, what we stand for, why we fight. Personally, for the last 25 years I have always stayed one step away from partisan politics. Instead, I have been partisan about a set of ideals: economic justice, civil rights, a humane foreign policy, freedom and a decent life for all of our citizens. This year, however, for many of us the stakes have risen too high to sit this election out.

Through my work, I've always tried to ask hard questions. Why is it that the wealthiest nation in the world finds it so hard to keep its promise and faith with its weakest citizens? Why do we continue to find it so difficult to see beyond the veil of race? How do we conduct ourselves during difficult times without killing the things we hold dear? Why does the fulfillment of our promise as a people always seem to be just within grasp yet forever out of reach?

I don't think John Kerry and John Edwards have all the answers. I do believe they are sincerely interested in asking the right questions and working their way toward honest solutions. They understand that we need an administration that places a priority on fairness, curiosity, openness, humility, concern for all America's citizens, courage and faith.

People have different notions of these values, and they live them out in different ways. I've tried to sing about some of them in my songs. But I have my own ideas about what they mean, too. That is why I plan to join with many fellow artists, including the Dave Matthews Band, Pearl Jam, R.E.M., the Dixie Chicks, Jurassic 5, James Taylor and Jackson Browne, in touring the country this October. We will be performing under the umbrella of a new group called Vote for Change. Our goal is to change the direction of the government and change the current administration come November.

Like many others, in the aftermath of 9/11, I felt the country's unity. I don't remember anything quite like it. I supported the decision to enter Afghanistan and I hoped that the seriousness of the times would bring forth strength, humility and wisdom in our leaders. Instead, we dived headlong into an unnecessary war in Iraq, offering up the lives of our young men and women under circumstances that are now discredited. We ran record deficits, while simultaneously cutting and squeezing services like afterschool programs. We granted tax cuts to the richest 1 percent (corporate bigwigs, well-to-do guitar players), increasing the division of wealth that threatens to destroy our social contract with one another and render mute the promise of "one nation indivisible."

It is through the truthful exercising of the best of human qualities - respect for others, honesty about ourselves, faith in our ideals - that we come to life in God's eyes. It is how our soul, as a nation and as individuals, is revealed. Our American government has strayed too far from American values. It is time to move forward. The country we carry in our hearts is waiting.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Springsteen is a writer and performer.
 
I usually prefer my entertainers not to use their celebrity to push political views unless they go about it smartly and actually know what they are talking about, which isn't actually too hard, as this example points out. I think its great that the "Vote for Change" tour is pretty obvious in its purpose. They are touring and performing in the name of their cause and I think thats great. Nothing annoys me more then political sneak attacks from celebrities at otherwise non political events.
 
Entertainers should stick to entertaining. I don't pay them to tell me who to vote for.
 
I think he should be against Saddam, the Dictator of Iran.


All entertainers should stay out of politics unless they want to run. They can make excellent politicians, occasionally, but more often then not they think they're more intellegent then everybody else because they're daft enough to be good actors and hitred the right plastic surgeion.
 
So you guys would be against the Concert to Free Tibet?

Or what about the Concert for Kampuchea back in the 1970s?

Or what about the LIVEAID concert? Or the Farmaid concerts?

SHould we get rid of Neil Young and Bob Dylan because they talk politics?

And is it the entertainer or the message that you find offensive?
 
Bradylama said:
Entertainers should stick to entertaining. I don't pay them to tell me who to vote for.


If it was a normal non political concert I would agree, but the purpose of the tour is to drum up support for Kerry, I doubt one would accidently attend thinking it had any other purpose. Its when they sneak it in during something unrelated to politics that it annoys me.
 
I don't listen to his music, but Springsteen is'nt a bad guy. No one with a cameo in High Fidelity could be.

And that's not what I was saying. An AIDS concert is'nt politics, it's charity. Barbra Striesand talking about the Dictator of Iran, Saddam Hussien, should shut up. She has no right to think her opinion is any more valid then anybody else's and that somehow God/the eternal nothingness/whatever gave her millions of dollars so she could blabber on about nothing.

This is'nt just a partisan thing either. I'm fucking pissed that Britney Spears does similar things.
 
ConstipatedCraprunner said:
I think he should be against Saddam, the Dictator of Iran.

CCR, I think you should know that Iran doesn’t have a dictator.
They have a ruling muslim religious council that basically runs things around there.
And an elected president Katami, who is more or less a puppet, since he needs to obey those priests.
 
Sovz said:
ConstipatedCraprunner said:
I think he should be against Saddam, the Dictator of Iran.

CCR, I think you should know that Iran doesn’t have a dictator.
They have a ruling muslim religious council that basically runs things around there.
And an elected president Katami, who is more or less a puppet, since he needs to obey those priests.
I was quoting Striesand.
 
But CCR-

If we accept that the world is full of inequality, why should companies like Halliburton be able to affect political speech by supporting the GOP while people like Barbara Streisand not be allowed to speak on her causes?

Don't get me wrong. I don't much care for Barbara Streisand. But she represents a truism of this country which has been furthered by Bush policies- that some people are more equal than others.

Does it make a difference where the source of the political power comes from? That the GOP is able to raise more money from corporations empowers their political speech. Why shouldn't entertainers have their say?

And I agree with you. If I was a member of the Republican party I would want Britanny to shut the fuck up too. Not only is she a posterchild for young republicans but for idiots as well. That bit from Moore's Fahrenheit 9-11 put a hurt to her career.
 
If we accept that the world is full of inequality, why should companies like Halliburton be able to affect political speech by supporting the GOP while people like Barbara Streisand not be allowed to speak on her causes?
One word; George Soros.

You guys get as much money from the trail lawyers, the Unions and the NAACP as we get from Haliburton or Enron.

I'm not saying they should'nt give money either. It's thier money. I just think shit like that Whoopi & friends star studded events are disgusting; even more so when Kerry pretends they're ordinary Americans.


Does it make a difference where the source of the political power comes from? That the GOP is able to raise more money from corporations empowers their political speech. Why shouldn't entertainers have their say?
Because it furthers the idea that these people's opinions matter more then ours. Because Holywood liberalism is infanitely more disgusting then any ohter kind. Because I'm tired of hearing actors I respect talking about politics.


And I agree with you. If I was a member of the Republican party I would want Britanny to shut the fuck up too. Not only is she a posterchild for young republicans but for idiots as well. That bit from Moore's Fahrenheit 9-11 put a hurt to her career.
I'd argue that Tucker Carlson-the guy who interviewd her-is more of one, but you have a point here.

Similarly, I don't expect you guys enjoy shit like that "Dictator of Iran" soundbite.
 
Back
Top