No Mutants Allowed

Go home Donald you're drunk.

Could be any year for all we know. I don't ever understand years any way, Should get rid of AD calendar and revert back to BC

@lolpop109 Revert back to BC?, Sorry, what?, Talk me through your logic here, how is it in your mind possible to revert to a calendar which is counting down to a date we've already passed?

It would actually make sense to have a kind of system that goes as far back like let us say, 10 000 years or what ever time 'civilisation' started. Kurzgesagt made a pretty cool video about why we should use a 12 000 year calendar:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czgOWmtGVGs

See Crni gets it ! There has to be a start date to time we know so why can't we use that !?. I know time is only relevant to us has humans and its a concept not reality. Surely though with advancing science

We can know how many times the earth has pased round the sun ? AD itself is a flawed concept based on religion. Not saying Christ was or was't born but to base the whole concept of date on something that may or may not have happened is completely stupid

We know for a fact when the frist humans where about. We know the date of the grist recorded date why can't we start from there. Our early point in time. Thats where we should start from because that a fact unlike baseing it on BC

Date is a concept. We can take the time where it was frist recorded and have that as the logical start point. As it is an idea it can only start from when it was conceived and recorded. Have a certain amount of years count down to a (Fictional) or not fictional event is completely stupid

The only and most logical thing to do would be start our know time and history from the start where by it began to us humans and order it as a number

I get Crnis idea of going to an early point and counting upwards, but lolpop's post suggested we "Revert back to BC", which didn't really make any sense since "BC" is an established system of date-keeping.