Search results

Sorry, haven't played it.

So, I've been messing around in this forum, being fucking stupid. Now it's time to actually be serious about something. What makes an actual rpg? I've seen countless user on this forum complain about how Fallout 4 isn't an rpg, but somehow a borderlands clone. If this is the truth, then what...

I'm 100% serious and want to invoke actual discussion on the subject.

Did Fallout: BoS do well?

So an opinion is the same as trolling?

I understand why it isn't a good thing, but why would a developer or publisher do that when the Fallout audience won't buy a CoD clone? If that were to happen, don't you think large drop in revenue would be expected?

The intro to BoS is my favourite intro to any form of entertainment I've ever had the privilege of experiencing. What you described is out of context and simply wrong.

The thing is, "Fallout Kart" will never happen, because the developer doesn't make games like that.

Oh noes, I've been court in the act! In all serious though, this thread isn't the same as the other one. I just want to know your comparison of the two games.

I'll list a couple: * CoD (I don't play it anymore * Star Wars: Battlefront 2 * Anything that isn't fantasy The list is probably bigger, but I don't keep tabs on what games I play. Also, if this makes me a fucking "casual", just, wow.

I personally think that Fallout: BoS is equal with the original masterpiece. What do you think? EDIT: I supposedly have to back up this claim as I asked a sort-of-not-really similar question already. BoS has: * Better gameplay * Better graphics * Better dialogue * Invents lore so good that it...

A Fallout game is something I have fun with. By that merit, then every game in the Fallout series belongs to said series.

It was a game wiki. Sorry, but I'd rather not link to it.

Is this sort of stuff allowed to be posted? I think I might do something similar soon...

"Could you possibly provide examples for what you would like examples for? I thought every request to provide examples in a review must have a least a couple of example examples." I took offence in that. Sorry if I misinterpreted it, but I thought that was a bit sarcastic.

This is my second status update.

So being sarcastic and condescending doesn't equal being a prick? Anyway, I get that your being broad, but when you mention "1-2" side quests you enjoyed, could you please specify?

No need to be a prick because I ask you to be specific. I'm don't disagree with the review, I just want to know what npcs or quests you hate, as you don't name any.

173: A water-cooled WW1 era HMG is an assault rifle

Could you possibly provide examples? I thought every review must have a least a couple of examples.