W
WelcomeToNewReno
Guest
I've been pondering something. If Fallout 3 was called Fallout: Capital Wasteland, and New Vegas called Fallout 3, would there be less fan rage? It'd be like Fallout POS, we'd eventually let it go.
Eternauta said:You mean Fallout: BOS, right?.
How so ? Would a "new" name or making it a "spin off" suddenly change the dialogue from mediocre crap to nobel prize quality ? Or would it come with new animations to replace the old and fucked up ones we saw in the game ? Maybe with improved AI even ? If yes. Then I agree a name change would make it a better RPG.Snikers said:You know, I think you're absolutely right. For all its flaws, Fallout 3 isn't really a bad RPG in its own right (IMHO). If it were given a "side-story" title, it'd probably be regarded the way Fallout Tactics is.
And all you guys talk about is how much you hate it. Can't we just agree that Fallout 3 and NV are two different types of games geared towards two different types of people. Its like comparing apples and oranges, can't they both be good in a different way?Yes we know, thats all you ever talk about.
Courier said:Fallout 3 isn't even a good shooter, it shouldn't take fifteen bullets to the head to kill someone.
Vegas is worse about that, I shot Vulpes eight times in the head at point black range and it barely scratched him.fifteen bullets to the head to kill someone.
Quagmire69 said:Vegas is worse about that, I shot Vulpes eight times in the head at point black range and it barely scratched him.fifteen bullets to the head to kill someone.
Courier said:But New Vegas isn't trying to be a shooter like FO3 was, and most of the gameplay is largely improved. The plot and dialogue makes up for any design flaws and engine limitations.