Anne Frank in North Korea

John Uskglass

Venerable Relic of the Wastes
"If Anne Frank Only Knew ...

Feb. 26, 2004



Lost In Translation


Anne Frank left behind a world-famous diary in which she wrote of love and peace. (Photo: CBS)



"Anne Frank's diary is a big plea...for freedom and for peace, but I think in North Korea, the diary is being used to promote war."
Miriam Bartelsman


Students are asked to read the book in honor of and at the request of North Korea dictator Kim Jong-Il. (Photo: AP)


The students are also being taught that war with America is inevitable. (Photo: CBS)



(CBS) If you want to hear "hate" coming out of the mouths of school kids, go to the schools of North Korea, as a Dutch television crew did, and you'll hear hate from that country's teenagers directed at the United States.

Western television reporters rarely get into North Korea, but remarkably they let a Dutch television crew in to see how they're using Holland's most famous book, “The Diary of Anne Frank.”

That diary, of her life in hiding during World War II, is now being studied in North Korea's schools. But Anne Frank's plea for peace and freedom got lost in translation.

North Korea is using her diary, not to teach how Anne suffered at the hands of the German Nazis, but to warn the students how they could suffer at the hands of those they call "American Nazis." Correspondent Mike Wallace reports.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
”After reading this book, I had a hatred for the American imperialists,” says one student.

“That warmonger Bush is just as bad as Hitler. Because of him we will always live in fear of war,” says another student.

But Anne Frank did not preach hate. Her diary is an enchanting, if horrific, day-by-day account of the time this Dutch teenager and her Jewish family spent hiding from the Germans who had invaded and occupied Holland.

Anne, her parents and sister hid in a small apartment in an attic in Amsterdam for more than two years. A bookcase concealed their secret stairway, but the Nazis eventually discovered them, and Anne died in a concentration camp when she was only 15.

Now, Anne Frank's house is a shrine to the courage she displayed, and the fear she lived with, under Hitler. Her diary has been translated into more than a 100 languages. Most recently, it was published in North Korea, where it's now part of the curriculum in their junior high schools.

Anne's plea for peace is a curious message for these students, because North Korea is constantly preparing for war. Dictator Kim Jong Il spends the country's meager resources maintaining a powerful military. And it turns out that North Korea is using Anne's diary to tell students they must sacrifice for the military -- because war with America is inevitable.

“The Americans enjoy war. It excites them. It's part of their nature,” says one student.

Here, they teach that today's Nazis are the Americans – and that today's Hitler is George W. Bush. And, to hammer that home, whenever North Korean students refer to President Bush, or to other Americans, they're taught to call them “Nazis,” or “warmongers."

“As long as the warmonger Bush and the Nazi Americans live, who are worse than Hitler's fascists, world peace will be impossible to achieve,” says another student.

But of course, that bellicose message runs counter to what Anne wrote in her diary: “You will understand that here in the attic, the desperate question is often asked: Why, oh why, go to war? Why can't people live in peace and why must we destroy everything?”

Why do the North Korean student think there are still wars in the world? “Because the cruel Americans want war,” replies one student.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All this came as a shock to Miriam Bartelsman, the reporter from Dutch television who received rare permission to come to the capital city of Pyongyang to see how North Korea is using Anne's diary.

For her report, she was allowed to talk with students about what they're learning from the book. After returning to Amsterdam, she told us that North Korea is simply turning Anne's message on its head.

“Anne Frank's diary is a big plea or a big cry for freedom, and for peace. But I think in North Korea, the diary is being used to promote war,” says Bartelsman.

These students sympathize with Anne, but according to Bartelsman, they do not respect her.

“She didn't win. She was not a hero, and North Korea, they are learning, the children, we all want to be a hero, and we don't want to be killed,” says Bartelsman.

‘We know that Nazi America is certain to start a war with us, but we will win that war,” says one student.

“Our students will fight with a pen in one hand and a weapon in the other until the last American is dead,” adds another student.

These youngsters parrot the words of North Korea's deputy minister of education, who uses Anne's diary to teach students that North Korea's top priority is to build a stronger military to defeat the Americans.

And to make sure the students give that same answer, Dutch television caught one teacher whispering to her students, telling them just what to say to the Dutch reporter.

Teacher:: Say that we don't want war, but that that is impossible as long as our enemy lives. So for us war is inevitable. We are not going to beg for peace. Instead, we must crush our enemy without mercy.

Student: You should not beg for peace. As long as the imperialists live, there will be no end to war.

“The most shocking thing is their comparison for President Bush with Hitler. that is absolutely disgusting,” says Anne’s cousin, Buddy Elias, who was her playmate and her last living direct relative.

Elias was the one who approved giving North Korea the rights to publish her diary, for a symbolic payment of less than $2,000.

“We were not told that it would be misused in schools. That, we had no idea,” says Elias, who considers today’s Hitler to be Kim Jong-Il, North Korea’s supreme leader. Kim insists that whenever anyone mentions his name, they must first call him respected or beloved.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And, in North Korea, teachers don't decide what their students will read. Those instructions come down from the top.

Why do the students think they were asked to read this diary? “According to our respected leader Kim Jung Il, the “Diary of Anne Frank” is one of the great classics of the world,” says one student. “That is why we read the diary -- out of great respect for our leader Kim Jung Il.”

“Our respected Gen. Kim Jung Il, with his warm and caring love for us students, gives us different foreign literature every year in hope that we can expand our intellectual development,” adds another student. “The ‘Diary of Anne Frank’ is part of that.”

In North Korea, all art, all music, all pageants are created to praise Kim Jong Il or his father, Kim Il-Sung, North Korea's first leader.

But while these children of the elite sing of their leader in Pyongyang, youngsters in the countryside are starving, reveal pictures that were smuggled out of North Korea by a German doctor. According to the World Food Program, almost half of North Korea's children, under the
age of 7, suffer from chronic malnutrition. But not the children of the establishment in Pyongyang.

“I’m certain that thanks to our beloved Gen. Kim Jung Il, we will never experience hunger like Anne did,” says one boy.

Another student read from the diary: “Why is there hunger when food rots away elsewhere? Why are people so crazy?”

When Bartelsman asked students if they could answer Anne's question, again their teacher told them just what to say: “Why isn't food distributed everywhere? Because the imperialist bourgeoisie take it -- that's why there is nothing left for the proletariat. Just say that.”

The student’s response: “Food is taken by the imperialist bourgeoisie, which is why there is nothing left for the proletariat.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently, these students don't know that in
their socialist paradise, up to a million people are now held in slave labor camps. But thanks to Anne Frank, they do know a lot about Nazi concentration camps.

Do they think that concentration camps like that still exist?

“Yes, I think such camps still exist. As long as there are American Nazis, there will be secret places where innocent people are murdered,” says one student. “Places like that exist in America. The prisons in America are comparable to concentration camps.”

And apparently, these students have learned what they were supposed to learn from Anne Frank's diary: When war with America comes, don't be a loser like her.

Could they live in hiding the way that Anne and her family did? “No,” says one student. “I would go and fight, instead of living like a beggar as Anne did.”

“For world peace, America will have to be destroyed,” adds another student. “Only then, will Anne's wonderful dream of peace come true.”
 
Funny, in the USSR according to my gf there wasn't too much of an anti-US rhetoric being taught in schools. Even the little that was evident was dismissed by almost everyone.

CCR, you should provide a link to the article instead of quoting the whole thing. Your poor re-formatting leaves much to be desired.
 
CC- I agree with JJ (even if I am guilty of the same crime), post the link. Sometimes, however, you can't post a link or the link doesn't work.

Anyway, I agree, this is a remarkable attempt of a totalitarian rewriting history for it's own purposes. 60 Minutes did a piece on Cuba where they found the same type of thing- history being rewriten by the government to statisfy it's own agenda.

You can't have honest history without free speech or free press, and in a totalitarian state, that's just not allowable.
 
Wow. The hatred coming from these people is really interesting. They are comparing the USA to Hitler, but fail to realise that what is being done to them, had been done by Hitler as well. The brainwashing of children.
“Yes, I think such camps still exist. As long as there are American Nazis, there will be secret places where innocent people are murdered,” says one student. “Places like that exist in America. The prisons in America are comparable to concentration camps.”
Now this is really interesting. Mailny because they are not entirely wrong. While Guantanamo Bay is of course MUCH better than a concentration camp, it is most certainly remarkable to find such a thing in a civilised country like the USA.

You can't have honest history without free speech or free press, and in a totalitarian state, that's just not allowable.
And even then honest history is not guaranteed, though it is expressed in less obvious ways.

This is what happened in post-war Western Europe and the USA. Everyone was taught a favorable USA-focused message, showing the superiority of western Europe and the USA throughout history, but largely ignoring such things as Eastern Europe when it comes to history. Why? Because Eastern Europe was now part of the "enemy's camp". And thus, Eastern Europe shouldn't be seen as a good thing....
 
Sander said:
Now this is really interesting. Mailny because they are not entirely wrong. While Guantanamo Bay is of course MUCH better than a concentration camp, it is most certainly remarkable to find such a thing in a civilised country like the USA.

Guantanamo Bay is not in America

Just saying

This is what happened in post-war Western Europe and the USA. Everyone was taught a favorable USA-focused message, showing the superiority of western Europe and the USA throughout history, but largely ignoring such things as Eastern Europe when it comes to history. Why? Because Eastern Europe was now part of the "enemy's camp". And thus, Eastern Europe shouldn't be seen as a good thing....

I see you've gotten some way in Davies

It is indeed interesting to see how Greece, which shares less common history with Western Europe than Poland, is considered closer to Western Europe than Poland.
 
Guantanamo Bay is not in America

Just saying
You know what I mean. :P
Besides, if you want to be picky, it IS in America. Just not in the USA. ;)

I see you've gotten some way in Davies
I have the tendency to read in sprints. Ie. I read about a hundred pages in a day, and then I read nothing for a month. Which is why I still haven't gotten farther than Otto and the German Holy Roman Empire. Bah. Should go back to reading it.
 
It is indeed interesting to see how Greece, which shares less common history with Western Europe than Poland, is considered closer to Western Europe than Poland.
Would be true if you said Bulgaria, Russia, Albania or Serbia, but Greece has alot more in common with say Italy then Poland.
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
It is indeed interesting to see how Greece, which shares less common history with Western Europe than Poland, is considered closer to Western Europe than Poland.
Would be true if you said Bulgaria, Russia, Albania or Serbia, but Greece has alot more in common with say Italy then Poland.

What, because of the common heritage?

Greece has had a post-Roman history completely different than that of the North-Western three (Germany, England, France), being a part of the Ottoman empire for such a long time.

Poland-Lithuania, however, has had a very common history with those up until the rise of Russia. It moved along with the industrial revolution where Greece did not.
 
Guantanamo Bay is not in America

Just saying

But says a lot. The reason why the prisoner camp/ detainee camp/concentration camp what ever is in Guantanamo Bay and not the US is that it's under military jurisdiction.

I believe these guys are under military law and based on an old case, In re Yamashita, the court leaves military law to the military more or less.

Which is a frightening idea and should be overruled. Even the military must be bound by the Constitution of a government.
 
o rly?

No, they did not. Italy and Greece are as close as Turkey and Greece, closer maybe. Poland is basically a part of western europe only it speaks a slavic language, like the Czechs.
 
Guantanamo Bay is not in America

Just saying

But says a lot. The reason why the prisoner camp/ detainee camp/concentration camp what ever is in Guantanamo Bay and not the US is that it's under military jurisdiction.

I believe these guys are under military law and based on an old case, In re Yamashita, the court leaves military law to the military more or less.

Which is a frightening idea and should be overruled. Even the military must be bound by the Constitution of a government.

But anyway, there are few totalitarian states where you don't see education being used as indoctrination. IN fact you may find few schools anywhere where education and indoctrination are essentially the same. The religious schools along the boarder of Pakistan and Afghanistan and the schools in North Korea have much in common.

Get them while their young and their minds are fresh and open, then you can tell them anything.

The Khymer Rouge were among the first to do this best. They would go into villages, kidnap children. Then they would brainwash the kids, then they would send those kids back to the village to commit an atrocity, thus assuring the kid couldn't go home.

In Africa one finds that kids have been soldiers in most conflicts. Why? Easy to recruit, train, utilize and sacrifice. One also sees that in Sri Lanka. Most of the suicide bombers there are teens. Again, you see the intensive brainwashing happening.

However most of those examples have not gained control over the state. It's when that type of education is used by the state that you see abuse of policy.

But then how different is this from the banning of headscarves in France? Are not both trying to impose standards on a culture through the indoctrination of young minds?
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
No, they did not. Italy and Greece are as close as Turkey and Greece, closer maybe. Poland is basically a part of western europe only it speaks a slavic language, like the Czechs.

Uh...what? I was *saying* Poland is more a part of Western Europe than Greece, and you say "Poland is basically a part of western europe only it speaks a slavic language". So you agree with me?

and if you're disagreeing, could you at least attempt to make a counter-argument?
 
I love it when people debate the history of the country I lived 10 years in. Really, I'm amazed you even know that the Poland-Lithuania union ever existed, since it isn't "near" the place you live.

Guys, you can't compare today's Poland to pre-war Poland. Neither Pre-WW1 Poland to the Poland-Lithuania union. We're talking about huge territory and cultural differences...

Remember that, after being raped a couple of times by the Swedes, this country was split up between the Prussians, the Austrians ans Russia. While culturally the Austrian part, in which was the culturally richest (Polish as a language was tolerated) and most influential city, Cracow was "a part" of Western Europe, the eastern part was always the poorest.

Then came WW2, almost 6 years of nazi occupation, and then Yalta (2/3 of the ww1 territory annexed by the USSR), the Soviets, occupying the country for a further 50 years. You can't imagine the mass brainwash and deportations made on such a long time period. In fact, some of the Party's propaganda are similar to the article you posted, CC. There was a lot of anti-US propaganda, I'm certain, as well as anti-nationalist propaganda. (The anti-"nationalist" propaganda was mainly targeted at the guerrilla that helped the Soviets, but demanded independance. My grandfather had his shops closec because the party uncovered he took an active part in the polish resistance during the nazi occupation )

Nowadays we witness a beautiful sprout of radical nationalism and mass consumerism, in an urban and psychical landscape formed by 50 years of communist terror. Yay.



To comment on the article, I believe it's a more radical thing of what's done on some Western media say, Fox news, on a larger scale. It's the mirror world of today's anti-terrorist propaganda.

It is disgusting. Just as any form of propaganda, wars, and brainwash used to ensure the stability of some bloody state.

What makes it worse is that they twist a good critic author's words to suit their doctrine... Remember Orwell's animal farm "All animals are equal" being transformed into "All animals are equal but some are more equal than others ?
 
I'm sorry but I'm not quick to pick up to that

the general feeling we were complaining about (sander and me) is that Europe is split between "West" and "East", "Capitalist" and "Communist" as if this split has always existed. This is simply not true

And despite the horrors suffered under the communist regime, Poland is still, thought not wholy, Poland, and if people delve a little deeper beyond the superficiallity of communism, they'd find that a country which has been split in a horrific way for a much longer period of time longer ago, like Greece or Spain, is less akin to the rest of Europe than those split for a shorter amount of time, like Poland or even Russia.
 
I didn't say that Poland was completely alien to Western Europe.

The point I was trying to point out (apparently didn't make myself clear enough and got caught in history lesson and pseudo-sociological ramblings instead) was that while it *is* on a Historic scale, one with "western" Europe, it presents the post-commuist syndrom much stronger than, say, the Czech Republic or Hungary.

"Western" history books aren't helping, either. I graduated from a french school and there were hardly any references to any east Europe countries.

And yes, the "split" came afer WW2 and with the iron curtain. An easy argument which could prove Poland was closer to the west is to point out France, the UK and Poland were the original "allies" after WW1.

Still, historically and culturally close to the west it may be, it isn't fully "western Europe", and I'd say Italy is much closer to "western Europe " than Poland is, in many ways. Been there two years ago.
 
Kharn I thought you where arguing the opposite. And you are, of course, right. Though from what I understand Poland's annexation (well, psedo annexation) of Lithuania was if anything bad for Poland culturally.

However, it is somewhat fair to call the Communist Empire the East, if by East you mean Slavic. Funny thing is that the Soviet polticical dominance basically covered every part of the world the Slavs ever coverd, save maybe Findland. Just look at East Germany, the Prussians where at one point a slavic people.
 
Hungary isn't a slavic nation. Neither the ~stans in the middle east. Neither Mongolia :P
 
Slavs where there before Magyars.
And the ~stans are not in the Mid East, they are just Islamic nations. But you have a point.
 
Wooz69 said:
"Western" history books aren't helping, either. I graduated from a french school and there were hardly any references to any east Europe countries.
Exactly the point I was making.

Everyone in Western Europe is still seeing Eastern Europe as somehow alien and completely different, not belonging to them or even being part of their history. This is a major example of the unnoticed influence of even a democratic country on the way history is viewed in democratic countries. School has never even touched on the subject of Eastern European countries or their history *ever*for me. This is the same in most countries. The only time when Eastern European countries are mentioned, is when those Eastern European countries somehow directly affect the Western European ones. Like the rather tragic history of Poland's borders and the Soviet Union after WW2. But nothing is ever said about the history of those countries.

This makes for two things:
A) A completely skewed view of history(and I love the blows Norman Davies delivers in his "Europe: A History" to historians who perpetuate it.)>
B) A view that somehow, somewhere, Eastern Europe is not part of "true" Europe.

However, it is somewhat fair to call the Communist Empire the East, if by East you mean Slavic
Yep. But it's not the point. I can call the capitalist world the West as well. The point is that everyone in Western Europe views Eastern Europe as seperate, and alien. This image has been created by the "Americanized history" which has been taught in schools for decades, now. If you call the Communist countries the east, then you're being fair. If you call the East communist or alien, or completely ignore it in history, then you're being stupid...
 
Back
Top