RE: V3
>Well, I guess that it just
>comes down to a difference
>of opinion. I would
>have thought that spending hundreds
>of hours playing a game
>and trying to get better
>at it, despite less than
>wonderful conditions, would make someone
>a hardcore gamer, but according
>to you being a hardcore
>gamer is something you buy.
No, according to me you're not a "hardcore" gamer because you're not willing to invest in hardware to make your gaming experience, not to mention speed of gameplay, much more improved.
You're sitting there behind your POS system watching as your framerate drops to 16FPS in 640x480x15bit when there's five guys on screen and a few explosions trying to predict where the guy will be because your system is so lagged. Boom you're dead because you can't even tell what happened. Would a "hardcore" gamer accept such limitations? You're just cannon fodder if you can't even see what's going on.
I mean HELL, you can't even play all the MAPS even when that game which is so old, how can you even call yourself a "hardcore" gamer when you can't even experience all the game has to offer?
Think about it, would you consider an audiophile an audiophile if the speakers he listens to music with are cheap $3 desktop speakers leading from his crappy Sound Blaster Ensonique? No way. He might enjoy whatever form of music emanates from those POS speakers simply because he does not know better, but by no standard is he an "audiophile" because audiophiles don't ACCEPT shit like that.
In a manner of speaking you may enjoy your gaming existence, but you are *not* a hardcore gamer by any means. You may be an "avid player" (with what you've got) but "hardcore?" No I don't think so.
-Xotor-
[div align=center]
http://www.poseidonet.f2s.com/files/nostupid.gif
[/div]