I noticed a
fan opinion that felt quite similar to another topic I like - what brought me here.
Thanks JR for bringing this up here! Indeed, the old BSG compared to the new series brings up resembling feelings with the old fans disliking it, or at least having second questions.
Marshall L Smith Jr (marshallsmithjrATpobox.com) said:
I look at the new show as a homage to the memory of the original rather than to the original show itself. Many fans, including myself, have questioned the logic of calling the new show Battlestar Galactica when it really has very little in common with the original. When you have a title like Battlestar Galactica that carries a specific semantic context and start introducing radical changes you are begging for trouble. When Star Trek The Next Generation debuted in 1987 it was clear from the beginning that this was "the next generation" and not a continuation of the Kirk era. The creators were able to start with an existing foundation and mythos and update it for a 1987 audience. There were no false expectations from fans of what to expect. If the Picard/Riker era was billed as a re-imagining of Star Trek then the guilty Paramount suits would have been dragged from their beds by angry mobs and never seen again. These incongruent references are responsible for angering old fans and emboldening new ones to take sides and that need not be the case.
...
It's important for stubborn original fans who still refuse to give it a chance to understand that in today's television economy you must reach a broad base of highly desirable demographics in order to justify a show that costs over 1.2 million per episode.
...
The highly coveted demographic happens to be the same people who watch sophisticated shows like 24 and the various crime dramas and who reject the ex machina of “candy†TV. Moore and Eick have taken the hard science element out of their science fiction show and replaced it with more drama. This, to me, is a winning formula and long overdue in sci-fi.
Those of us who love the original should make room for the new, as it brings incredible creativity to the table.
...Let's enjoy this great new chapter in sci-fi history while holding vigil that the original may some day find new life.
A standing ovation for this man. Well put indeed!
I agree that BSG should have gotten a new subtitle. As does F3.
The obvious F3 reference aside, I'll just continue about my BSG opinion.
I must say that I love the show. What some referenced at as "slower political episodes" kept me going. I really wonder how mankind's psyche reacts to such a recogniseable situation, in modern "terror" society and current SciFi fantasy.
That may have driven the creators to re-create the earth-like setting, with a president and all - although I must agree with Davaris and others that some setting details (humvee, Colonial/AirForce One) are mistakes.
It did not bother me that much however. the consistency in the "tech era" is ok, it's like present day but with FTL drives.
A though that crossed my mind is that all "futuristic" devices, with a PCB, can be influenced by the Cylon - or a EMP pulse, with all the nuclear weapons being tossed around.
The technical aspect is something I miss, I liked that part in other SciFi series. Although I can understand that only a small percentage of our population has the technical background, and/or the interest needed to try and grasp next generation technologies.
As JR mentioned, the psychological results of such a hopeless society are vast on every individual. This must be what it was like in the vault: Uncertainty, pecking order shifts, insanity - but this time dipped in a "don't trust your neighbour" sauce, as every one can be a machine-copied version of the real thing, trying to eradicate your race...
This all falls under the "demographic ratings" part. You can't assume that something will sell succesfully, and go play with millions of cash. Too bad this system is flawed, as quality seekers have - imho - long abandoned TV as viewing alternative. Most of Earth cannot receive the SciFi channel, and are force-fed call&sms games, big brother, the simple life and other mind-numbing cr*p.
I no longer have TV distribution, until we shift to on-demand (or broader choice) it's no loss for me, I'm on a sole boycot then ^_^
Davaris:
Good point about the nukings, there are some scenes where certain plot characters should have gotten a lethal dosage of radiation.
However, Muff mentioned that they possibly wanted Caprica for themselves (what a name is that anyway, you eat a Paprika) - not possibly, why else would they have started building there.
Remember the Sharon copy and Helo trying to get off there? It was infested by Cylons. They could have nuked the resistance there out of existence easy, but chose to build there and test on humans. I believe the mixed breeding thing started there, and - come on - the Cylons let them escape.
Requiem:
Although it sounds brilliant, "giving away that man created Cylons" is the main plot of the show. It gives background to why Gaius is having his visions, why the mixed babies are so important - too many references in the early series.
It would have provided a more WOW effect when told later, but I prefer a show with a more subtle plot and some good cliffhangers over a constant WOW show with no depth.
Your "holes in the story" (where a lance of vipers can fly through) also got me going a while, but when watching the series in a row they do close a lot of gaps in the later episodes.
If they're good storywriters, they made note of the holes and will fill it in due time. Besides, every good show had some holes - one of the key elements of the series is showing that humanity is flawed
Muff:
About "not exploring the virus on the beacon" - as I just said, a good storywriter takes note of that, and uses it in the plot later on. Time will tell whether they have good writers!
The Blackbird (Delta Flyer) ship was made for recon IMHO, and isn't sturdy enough for dogfights. that would explain why they don't mass-produce it.
I believe they also received some fighters from the Pegasus, only that ship was destroyed - it's fighters were guarding the civilian ships.
Outfitting civilian ships with guns crossed my mind too. That would disallow the word "civilian" to be used however, as it suddely becomes a threat to Cylons - and thus a target.
You don't want to draw fire to a poorly armored ship filled with civilians, right
Man, what a post... Time for a ciggy now.
Brings me to the last topic: JR, I think you were referencing to the smoking doctor. As in a clearly good person smoking versus contemporary "bad guy smoking" in popular shows and movies.
That a health'expert' is smoking, when mankind faces extintion, is a weird choice. Showing once again that mankind is flawed
So say we all.
Ps: I'm on a foreign keyboard, NMA's spelling function doesn't work, and I don't have Word (for spellcheck) here. I'll re-read tomorrow. Sorry for the errors.[/url]