Big shit in Thailand

Jebus said:
Or, in short: there's less poverty in Thailand than in the USA

Sorry to derail the topic (not trying to argue the disaster thing now), but do you know what their definition of poverty is? I couldn't find it on their site. It's sometimes defined as half of the median income, which causes people in developed countries to be classified as poor that would be rather well off in a developing country. If they're official numbers they could mean just about anything; for instance, the US definition of poverty focuses solely on income and disregards assets completely.
 
Ratty: I'm very well aware more countries were struck, and that Thailand was only one of the countries who contributed to the total of 60k dead, yet Thailand was the country Rosh specifically referred to.

Per: Thailand is known to be one of the new 'tigers' of Eastern Europe. With literacy rates of 92%, life expectancy of 71 years, a GINI index of 41, real economic growth of 6%, death rates of 6% and way lower unemployment figures and government debt than even Belgium has, Thailand seems to be pretty darn wealthy to me.
Also, poverty line means 'to be able to afford the neccesities to live' - such as housing, clothing, food and the likes - so the defenition of it does not change dependant on the country in question.
 
Jebus said:
Also, poverty line means 'to be able to afford the neccesities to live' - such as housing, clothing, food and the likes - so the defenition of it does not change dependant on the country in question.

Well, that same source concedes that "A poverty line is an arbitrary indicator" which "has been defined in several ways".

I'm not questioning the wealth of Thailand, so there's not much point to this post. Me ---> bed.
 
Jebus said:
Or, in short: there's less poverty in Thailand than in the USA; and especially the people who lived alongside the Thai beaches might very damn well have been richer than you.

Oh, right. Then they deserved it anyway. How dare they be richer than me! :shock:
 
Jebus said:
World economics isn't your strong point, eh?

Pulling statistics from your ass as some kind of fact isn't yours, I'm afraid. I could also point out that a lot of US poverty comes from the fact that people can't take care of themselves or even possess simple skills such as cooking food. Poverty due to not being able to afford fast food on a welfare check is pretty fucking comical, but it does happen. The reason why most Thai are over the poverty line is because they know how to cook, the climate does allow for living in a grass hut, and they can cook some amazing things on pennies per serving that would make American cuisine seem like overpriced shit. Their life, for the most part, is uncomplicated to the point where they can afford such leisures. In this, I have respect for their culture, although I do stand by my views that the average American or media junkie would care about these people as they would care about a cockroach, and therefore disregard them. As apparently statistics are what their culture means to you.

Just as anyone in any extreme climate knows, those who tend to live in houses of better construction tend to survive natural disasters far more easily. I know several villages would have been FUCKED at this, and I don't even need a magic Fox news crystal bowling ball.

Or, in short: there's less poverty in Thailand than in the USA; and especially the people who lived alongside the Thai beaches might very damn well have been richer than you.

I've been to Thailand. Those who live on the rivers and live in houses that are easily swept away are mostly FISHERMEN. Which there is still a thriving industry of, but it doesn't pay shit. There are some incidentals of tourists and people in that area, and of course what happened at the brunt of the force of the impact was to be expected as well as neighborhoods being put underwater. After that, it relies on building integrity. When entire neighborhoods are swept away when they are made of little more than what a fisherman can afford, they don't fare too well under tysunami conditions. You shouldn't need to live in Florida to know the difference in construction grades under hurricane/tsunami conditions, I would think it to be common sense. A grass or board hut, which many people live in there, is hardly anything to compare with a trailer, yet many know how well those fare in tornadoes and hurricanes.

So when I say the lowest of the low would have taken the brunt of this more than others, don't take it as a knock on the country as a whole before you open your uneducated twat, okay?

As for whether one or the other has more impact, I say it still has everything to do with how the person associates themselves with the target. If they are mostly ambivalent towards both by nature, then it would be the more widespread and affecting the most amount of people. First, the mind goes by association, then by quantification.
 
I found out yesterday that I have a friend in Thailand, his on holliday.
I just hope that I get some kinda word from him soon.
 
Turns out several hundred, maybe more than a thousand, Swedes drowned. Kinda big, as there are only 8 million of them. All over the news all day long.

And yeah, my brother better call soon. Or I'll go down there and kill him. I met a friend yesterday who knew maybe a dozen people living on those islands, many were close friends. He hasn't heard from them yet. Also seems the Andaman islands are gone.
 
Also note that Thailand is actually one of the least hit areas. Sri Lanka: 29,000 dead. Indonesia: 32,000 dead. Thailand: 1,500 dead.

This is getting insane. Highest death tolls I've....ever seen in my life time.

PS: I wish you people who still have people they know in that area luck and strength.
 
Sander said:
This is getting insane. Highest death tolls I've....ever seen in my life time.


I think we have to agree it's the biggest disaster in History. Funny how the generation after ours will be making Discovery documentaries about it.
 
Baboon said:
I think we have to agree it's the biggest disaster in History. Funny how the generation after ours will be making Discovery documentaries about it.

I'd say the biggest disaster was the introduction of European diseases in the Americas...
However, that is perhaps a natural disaster of a slightly different order.
 
Spanish Flu? Stalin's collectivization projects? Those are still several orders of magnitude above this.
 
I think we have to agree it's the biggest disaster in History.
No we don't. I said 'in my life time' for a reason. Namely that it was the biggest death toll I know of in my life time. I can easily think of many historical occurrences that had higher death tolls.

And that it's within a few days instead of stretched out over many years doesn't actually do anything to diminish or increase the 'size' of the disaste (if that is anything you can objectively describe, because you probably can't), the same number of people still died with the same cause.
 
All horrible, horrible stuff.

I also wish those who might have friends/family in the affected areas my best wishes, as it appears there was no warning whatsoever.

I'm reading 80,000+ fatalities so far. Good grief.
 
Pope_Viper said:
I'm reading 80,000+ fatalities so far. Good grief.

i'm sure it'll hit 100.000 soon.

anyhow, you can expect about double those causualties later on. disease & epidemics...
 
st0lve said:
I found out yesterday that I have a friend in Thailand, his on holliday.
I just hope that I get some kinda word from him soon.

Where was your friend headed towards, do you know?

I called a friend I went to high school with, and he was pretty much in shock when he talked about what would have happened to the village he grew up in. If Sri Lanka and Indonesia both had problems, then Pho Phuket and other islands that home a few villages would have been screwed. I doubt those have been taken into full account yet, as Phi Phi is still completely off limits after the disaster, and the Thai govt doesn't really keep a firm consensus of the more remote villages.

As for the death figures in which country, I was a bit asleep when I posted my first reply, so I got figures off by a long margin as in terms to just Thailand (which has comparatively little), sorry about that. Although I do know that they are still looking for a couple of entire villages at this point, so I was going by what I would guess the effects to be compared to previous tsunamis.

Sri Lanka and others would have been hit far worse than Thailand, and they were starting to really get on their feet. With tourism hosed...ugh, I hate to see how this is going to affect the rebuilding there outside of donations and aid. The same for Indonesia.

This wouldn't be the first really bad tsunami hit Thailand, although a Siam king once called a mild tsunami a 'peasant-washer'.

As for Indonesia, I can just say one word. Earthquake + Tsunami = fucked. It wouldn't be hard to imagine how the combination of both would have been like using a donkey dick (construction slang for a special 2' long vibrator used for settling cement - don't try this at home, ladies) and watching every bit of crap on top get swallowed up into the cement equivalent of quicksand. Then turn the hose on. :shock:
 
Baboon said:
Turns out several hundred, maybe more than a thousand, Swedes drowned. Kinda big, as there are only 8 million of them. All over the news all day long.

I heard 1500 swedish are missing and around 50 found dead.
And theres 9 milion swedish in Sweden that is, no doubt plenty of us around the rest of the world.
 
Pope_Viper said:
All horrible, horrible stuff.

I also wish those who might have friends/family in the affected areas my best wishes, as it appears there was no warning whatsoever.

I'm reading 80,000+ fatalities so far. Good grief.

I agree, and to those who might have families or friends there, my sympathies.

The numbers I am seeing says close to 100K. Pessimistically I would say that the numbers are going to exceed that. It seems most of the current death count are of those who were swept away in the wave. The numbers will increase with Cholera, typhoid, and all sorts of diseases begin to take hold. With so many dead, and the destruction of the basic infrastructure, this is inevitable. It is usually disease and malnutrition that does most of the killing in the war zones of Africa.

100K. The numbers, after awhile, can´t be fully comprehended. This is like 100K Japanese vaporized in a fireball over Hiroshima. And saying that I recall worse- famines in Somalia, Ethiopia, genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, former Yugoslavia, and god knows how many natural disasters.

But perhaps it´s only news.

You guys are perhaps getting distracted by whether it was more `evil´ as a natural disaster or ´terrifying` as a natural event. But I think what matters is ´who´.

This is sad, but maybe it´s how we see things. 1000 + Scandinavians? I hear it´s almost 3000 Europans, but maybe that´s a preliminary figure. I have no idea how many Americans.

For most of you these are just fisherman living on some tropical beach- and perhaps they don´t matter as much. It was also a lot of vacationing tourists, but probably a small number in comparison.

Maybe the WTC was more shocking to Americans because it was Americans being killed. A tidal wave wiping out the coast of France, or California, killing 100K people would be more ´important` for a lot of people.

I just finished Aiden Hartley´s book about his life as a coorespondent in Africa during the 1980s-90s (Rwanda, Somalia, Ethiopia) and the thing is that, for the most part, people don´t care because those who die are of a different culture, different religion, different color.

At one point he says that 1 american or european was worth about 25 in the middle east, 50-100 in Africa, and I think he was being generous. Case in point, the Europeans and the UN were all caught up in the tangle of the collapse of Yugoslavia, and they convenient ignored or pulled out of Rwanda´s massive genocide until being guilted back in by the UN Secretary General who asked if black Africans were worth the same as white europeans. Millions die in Congo´s wars over the past ten years, and the world doesn´t blink- it´s just another in the black hole of Africa.

This has been happening for years. A disaster strikes, for the charity agencies it becomes a feeding frenzy, the relief machine slowly grinds up, and by the time it gets there to offer relief, little can be done but to bury the bodies.

And maybe that´s the real, mundane, evil- our apathy or disinterest in the suffering of others, and the way we judiciously afford our attentions.
 
Back
Top