Couple of questions on the Fallout universe

DirtDigger2000

First time out of the vault
Hi guys,

I have a couple of questions about the fallout universe in general.Both,mostly,spring from reading the Fallout Bible and both are hypothetical in nature and i would be interested on any theories on the two subjects.

1.Would it be safe to assume,given the FEV interaction from the broken vats with radiation,that the more extreme mutations and creatures found in the world are mainly localized to the western US?Given the history available i would feel safe in thinking that super mutants and ghouls are not roaming the central asian steppes unless something similar took place in that location.

2.This one is just off the wall and mainly influenced by old sci-fi movies.Given the time when the war happened,and the technology developed.Do you think it was possible that there was a space program,far enough along,to where people were living on Mars or the moon in little bubble cities,And if so what became of them?
 
FEV as the ultimate excuse, and Buck Rogers space cities

Okay... first off, while FEV would be limited to the U.S. West Coast, radiation was (until the Fallout Bible) the primary factor in the majority of mutations. Super Mutants (well, them and the Master) are the only things that were certainly FEV-induced according to Fallout 1, though Centaurs and Floaters could be connected as well.

As for your second question... access to space would open up several possibilities for new resources, though few would be energy-related, making the war slightly less likely. Besides, I never heard or read anything about space exploration, in the games or Bible.
 
Re: FEV as the ultimate excuse, and Buck Rogers space cities

DGT said:
As for your second question... access to space would open up several possibilities for new resources, though few would be energy-related, making the war slightly less likely. Besides, I never heard or read anything about space exploration, in the games or Bible.

Thats why the space question is a bit off the wall.There is nothing mentioned about it in the timeline,but there are alot of things not mentioned.It would be impossible to create a whole world history just for the game.Makes more sense to just deal with things that directly led to the war and events after.

Yet i find it hard to believe a society as advanced as the pre-fallout one..one in which fusion cars,genetic engineering,power armors,and energy weapons were available...was not also in an advanced state of space exploration,up to and including,space colonies and manned space stations.
 
Re: FEV as the ultimate excuse, and Buck Rogers space cities

Question 1, I don't have much to say. The overarching questions about space, well... I do.

DGT said:
Besides, I never heard or read anything about space exploration, in the games or Bible.
I wouldn't trust the "Bible", MCA was pulling things out of his ass in more than a few places. 'Course, you might say the same about me. But I believe my information to be accurate, and my extrapolations well-founded.

In any case, we can't really know whether there was an active space program. You'd think there would be, as Sputnik was launched in the 1950s (Space Race begin!)... seeing as Fallout's pre-war culture is based on the 1950s vision of the future, it seems highly plausible that there'd be far more development along those lines.

You could use the "Space Shuttle" in Fallout 2 as proof, but really... just LOOK at San Francisco. It's nearly up there with New Reno on the ridiculousity (technical term there) scale.
And anyway, the person who designed the Shuttle model seemed to be thinking in terms of what our current technology is developing toward instead of retro-future style.

One could count the BOMB-001 and 002 battle stations in Van Buren, but they can't really be considered canon at this point. (however unfortunate that may be)
Even if you do take them as canon, considering only one station was completed before the global purge went down it's easy to view the program as an incomplete venture. Though it wasn't put up there for the purpose of exploration or colonization in the first place, but so the USA could gain a theoretically insurmountable nuclear high ground.

In Van Buren there's also mention of the pre-war Enclave attempting to convert two nuclear-powered rockets into transports to take personnel off-planet, but they apparently didn't manage to before the bombs dropped.

The bubble cities, it's hard to see happening. Sci-fi (especially older) tends to assume an incredible, inexhaustable, and ubiquitous energy source in our future which allows easy space exploration/colonization and various other incredible feats. It's pretty clear the Fallout Universe didn't have that, even if they thought Nuclear energy was it. If they did, they at least wouldn't have had to fight over OIL, would they?

--------------
About the whole "society as advanced as the pre-Fallout one" bit:

Just because all those things were "available" doesn't mean that the universe must therefore have been capable of advanced space travel. Most of those technologies had been very recent developments, and they're all EXTREMELY tiny when compared to the logistics of a full-fledged space colonization program.

DirtDigger2000 said:
one in which fusion cars
Fusion powered cars seemed to be a curiosity, and it's therefore implied they weren't yet being produced in large number. It's more likely that they simply COULDN'T be mass-produced because of the Military monopolizing the higher-end machine tools needed.
It's very likely that most vehicles of the time still used gasoline or might have been gas-electric hybrids (that's veering toward our technology, though).

genetic engineering
The PIV/FEV project seems to have been the pinnacle of genetic engineering at the time, and FEV itself could be considered a failure. It could be argued that it would've worked perfectly pre-war, since there was nowhere near as much radiation... at least Richard Grey's experiments seem to point to that. In any case, it's implied that genetic engineering wasn't widespread (or used at all) outside of military projects.

power armors
In Fallout, ZAX claims that the T-51b armor was only put into production in 2076, which means only about a year in field operation. The war is also said to only last from 2076-2077.

MCA, however, claims in the Fallout Bible that the war with China lasted from 2065-2077 and that various types of primitive Power Armor were fielded by America throughout the war. China had supposedly started mass-producing their own Power Armor that was on par with America's earlier suits when the T-51bs burst onto the scene and wrecked everything in their path. China panicked, the button was hit.

In either explanation, Power Armor had been a very recent development in the universe. Nearly all of the T-51's tech would have been useful for the space program... had it been developed in a more peaceful time. Of course had it been a more peaceful time, the suit's technology likely wouldn't have been developed at all.

and energy weapons were available
They were available, yes, but it's not clear how widespread they were, or if they were commonly accepted. The Plasma Rifle was probably a very recent development, as even the T-51b didn't seem to have adequate protection against it.
The Plasma Rifle might've been developed at the same time by an R&D group that the people at West-Tek didn't have contact with, which would explain why the T-51b developers didn't seem to take the threat into account. They then concocted the hardening process mainly to increase the suit's protection against Plasma, but only a few suits were upgraded before the bombs dropped.
This would explain why the Brotherhood doesn't have Hardened Power Armor, but there are Enclave soldiers on the Oil Rig wearing it.
The Laser Rifle and Laser Gatling were probably very common, probably to the point of standardization because the T-51b was clearly developed to be extremely resistant against Lasers.
The Pulse Grenades, Rifle and Pistol seem pretty exotic, and might have been rare. Most of the technology in Fallout is Vacuum-Tube based, so they wouldn't have had that much utility outside of the fact that their very existence would limit the usefulness of Robots on the battlefield.
--------------

The whole point is that had these technologies been already widespread at the time of the war, then it would be plausible that space colonization would be close at hand or already a reality. But they weren't, and the space technology we know of in Van Buren seems to have been mostly for military application. Fallout 2 contradicts that with the infamous "Space Shuttle", but Fallout 2 is a big bag of contradictions and absurdities. Van Buren's view is more likely and more believable (not to mention more true to Fallout's theme), even if it can't be viewed as canon.

Whew. A bit of a long, meandering post there. Having to fill your head with knowledge of Fallout, it all spills out. It's not like anyone is using it.
 
DGT said:
Okay... first off, while FEV would be limited to the U.S. West Coast, radiation was (until the Fallout Bible) the primary factor in the majority of mutations. Super Mutants (well, them and the Master) are the only things that were certainly FEV-induced according to Fallout 1, though Centaurs and Floaters could be connected as well.
afaik Centaurs are failed merging experiments done by the Master. floaters were the Master's pets too, so one can only assume he had a hand in them as well.

anyhow, the big mutations were restricted to areas that were poluted by FEV. still, lesser mutations would still be found around the globe, but nothing as shocking as centaurs.

DirtDigger2000 said:
Yet i find it hard to believe a society as advanced as the pre-fallout one..one in which fusion cars,genetic engineering,power armors,and energy weapons were available...was not also in an advanced state of space exploration,up to and including,space colonies and manned space stations.
the technology is there, but due to resource constraints, i doubt they'd go any further than some small MIR-like spacestation with a year of autonomy, maximum.

in the cold war, there was prestige & moral victory to be gained with first Sputnik, first animal in space, first man in space, first man on the moon. however, to go as far as to build actual cities or huge spacestations in a world where resources are already extremely scarce and global politics (and hence trade) are extremely flameable, is extremely unlikely. it'd be easy to believe that if there was an active spaceprogram, it was monopolised by the military. not bent towards civil applications (cities on the moon), but towards military applications (orbital nukes, ballistic missile detection,...). a city on the moon could be a very good way to preserve the american way of life after a cataclysm, but that would require them to be totally self contained, something i highly doubt (and which would be VERY costly to develop). instead, they turned towards big Vaults, which were not self contained (they drew ground water which needed to be purified).

i also believe that with the doctrine of the time, a space city or a big space station would be considered retreat or surrender. the USA can't be defeated, you infidel! if 'we' are bombed, we shall return to american soil from our underground vaults once the threat is has been cleared!
 
I read in some of the Fallout 3 design documents that there actually is a space station, and a rocket prepared to launch to it. It was dropped due to the war. In one document about the ending of FO3 you actually used the rocket to get to the space station to prevent a nuclear missle launch. I beleive the documents can be found in the download section.
 
forddieselguy said:
I read in some of the Fallout 3 design documents that there actually is a space station, and a rocket prepared to launch to it. It was dropped due to the war. In one document about the ending of FO3 you actually used the rocket to get to the space station to prevent a nuclear missle launch. I beleive the documents can be found in the download section.
I believe that that's already been mentioned. I also believe that an unreleased game with unofficially released design documents doesn't usually count as canon.

Dirtdigger said:
1.Would it be safe to assume,given the FEV interaction from the broken vats with radiation,that the more extreme mutations and creatures found in the world are mainly localized to the western US?Given the history available i would feel safe in thinking that super mutants and ghouls are not roaming the central asian steppes unless something similar took place in that location.
Some dangerous mutations would still be possible elsewhere. The Deathclaws were probably non-FEV mutated, as were the Radscorpions and the huge rats. The Centaurs, Floaters and Super Mutants were FEV mutations, though.
 
Sander said:
Some dangerous mutations would still be possible elsewhere. The Deathclaws were probably non-FEV mutated, as were the Radscorpions and the huge rats. The Centaurs, Floaters and Super Mutants were FEV mutations, though.

Wasn't there a dialogue with the Shady Sands doctor where he said that radiation alone was unlikely to explain even the mutation rate of the radscorpions? Also remember that Tim Cain and Chris Taylor disagreed on whether radiation alone accounted for the origin of the ghouls. Probably that was the basis of the Bible's assumption that FEV was behind nearly every significant mutation. Didn't it also say that there weren't any non-mutated animals around at all - would that hold true for the rest of the world as well?
 
Per said:
Wasn't there a dialogue with the Shady Sands doctor where he said that radiation alone was unlikely to explain even the mutation rate of the radscorpions? Also remember that Tim Cain and Chris Taylor disagreed on whether radiation alone accounted for the origin of the ghouls. Probably that was the basis of the Bible's assumption that FEV was behind nearly every significant mutation. Didn't it also say that there weren't any non-mutated animals around at all - would that hold true for the rest of the world as well?
Wait, I thought that that dialogue said that it was a heavily mutated emperor scorpion, probably caused by radiation?

Anyway, I'd be more inclined to believe Tim Cain than Chris Taylor here, in part because Chris was the second (not the first) lead designer, in part because Chris was responsible for checking over Tactics' storyline and such (we still love you, Chris). Besides, in light of the 50s setting and the fact that people had to be completely dipped in FEV (not just exposed slightly), I find it somewhat more fitting.

But to be honest, this has never been fully decided. Although MCA did retract his statement about FEV later in the bible.
 
I thought i read in the bible that the rapid mutations were due to the airborne FEV coupled with radiation.That seemed to be the explanation for the ghouls too or else they would have been killed outright.
 
You said you'd be interested in any theories, but then it looks like you didn't even bother to read any of the posts in the topic. If you didn't, you should.

Anyway. I'll sum up the later posts for your benefit: there's disagreement over the true explanation, as even the two lead developers of Fallout disagreed. There is no officially consolidated timeline (don't say the "Bible" timeline, because it's NOT), so just go with whatever you think sounds better. Just be aware that not everyone will agree.
 
The "Bible" timeline is actually a copy of the original Fallout timeline that was used as a guideline while making the Fallout games. It IS the official timeline.

Accepted theory on FEV has it that it has nothing to do with mutations, by both the Bible (MCA retracts his earlier theory later) and the lead designer (Tim Cain, also note that the disagreement him and Taylor had was about ghouls, not about rats/radscorpions/manti).

Suffer thinks no debate is necessary on the point.

Dirtdigger, your remark "i thought i read in the bible" directly follows Sander's statement that this remark was retracted, showing you're not reading this thread. Since the thread is in reply to your questions, this is extremely rude.
 
I did read through,trust me,and i appreciate all answers.

There were a few revisions and contradictions in the bible.Thats why i wrote the last post,i'm not an expert and i don't know which answer holds more sway.

Sorry if you feel i wasted your time.
 
I guess that the previous explanation made more logical sense as everyone exposed to high radiation(sans FEV)would turn into ghouls.So the majority of people should be Ghouls instead of normals if radiation exposure alone accounted for the condition.
 
DirtDigger2000 said:
I guess that the previous explanation made more logical sense as everyone exposed to high radiation(sans FEV)would turn into ghouls.So the majority of people should be Ghouls instead of normals if radiation exposure alone accounted for the condition.
...
That's some pretty fucked up logic. They only become ghouls when directly exposed to very high levels of radiation, the kind that makes people's skin fall off. Since most people still have intact skins, they were not exposed to such radiation.
 
The major factor is prolonged exposure of non-lethal levels.

Ghouls were exposed to radiation several times, were untreated, and the radiation was left to run its course. The body, after having to deal with that amount of radiation repeatedly and regularly, would have mutated along Fallout's science fiction to form the conventional ghoul. It is the double-edged sword of Science!*, in that it doesn't do anything really good for humankind, but it will make scorpions and other species big a la THEM! or have some other fictional results.

Glowing ones were probably folk that got a bit glowing, but managed to survive the large lethal doses several times until their body mutated in regards to the radiation (NO FEV present, as it would kill them due to severe organ overhaul of radiated individuals - read the Fo1 Glow supercomputer's FEV notes about that). At this point, they probably live near a constant source of radiation, and probably never go back to a normal rad count or anywhere close.

The apparent mindlessness of the glowing ones, only recognizing food and "warmth", seems to reflect the toll the constant exposure has upon the human body, and further irony of mankind's mistakes with radiation and nuclear weapons is made.

* - Science! Science Fiction of a certain grandstanding flavor, which in turn meshed with Fallout's retro art deco style in ruin, to help further the dark irony. The concept is pretty much the grandiose "House of Tomorrow", usually gone horribly wrong, from many conventional 40's-on science-fiction/horror themes, creature features, science gone horribly wrong given mankind's meddling, etc..
 
Thanks.

That explanation helped me wrap my head around the Ghouls being solely a product of radiation exposure.The example of the movie Them being key in that.
 
Back
Top