Does Bethesda listen to feedback?

I didn't even post Godwin's law yet. I'm merely using flawed logic and the lowest form of wit to invalidate your flawed logic. And if my comments were aimed at Bethsoft, you wouldn't be complaining about that.
 
Godwin's law said:
I didn't even post Godwin's law yet. I'm merely using flawed logic and the lowest form of wit to invalidate your flawed logic. And if my comments were aimed at Bethsoft, you wouldn't be complaining about that.
All I'm saying is: stop trolling.

Thank you.
 
Godwin's law said:
I didn't even post Godwin's law yet. I'm merely using flawed logic and the lowest form of wit to invalidate your flawed logic. And if my comments were aimed at Bethsoft, you wouldn't be complaining about that.

I would.

Flawed logic is flawed logic.
Take off the bias goggles and read views from all of the NMA community, not the select few you disagree with.

*edit*
sorry to feed the troll :oops:
 
Dont you see it? we're rabid, we're not real fans, that's why they dont listen to us :p That's extremely depressing for a interview :(
 
Bullshit. It looks to me like the best part of Bethesda ran down the crack of their momma's ass and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress!

I think we been cheated! :shock:
 
Black said:
Of course, not rabid fans = open minded fans = fans who will buy every shit beth sells them
They don't make shit. Maybe you don't think their games are great, understandable, but it's not like they're making or will ever make 'The elder scrolls: piece of shit" or a big rigs: over the road.

xdarkyrex said:
Godwin's law said:
I didn't even post Godwin's law yet. I'm merely using flawed logic and the lowest form of wit to invalidate your flawed logic. And if my comments were aimed at Bethsoft, you wouldn't be complaining about that.

I would.

Flawed logic is flawed logic.
Take off the bias goggles and read views from all of the NMA community, not the select few you disagree with.
I was only responding to the few that were shortsighted in my opinion, I'm not judging you all.


Thanks for feeding me. :P
 
Bllody hell, I was one of the most vocal of the wait and see crowd. The more I waited and saw, the more convinced I was of Bethesda's inability to produce something with a clear vision which constitutes a true sequel.

Feedback has nothing to do with patronizing competitions to design perks, or a circle-jerk of adulation. If they would even acknowledge the existance of NMA, beyond the occasional prod with a shitty stick, that they do read the view and opinions of this highly invested and often knowledgeable fanbase, then it might be a start.

I'm sure that everbody with something negative to say, who suspects that Fallout 3 is going to be an unfaithful mess, would love nothing more than to be proved wrong.
 
Godwin's law said:
They don't make shit. Maybe you don't think their games are great, understandable, but it's not like they're making or will ever make 'The elder scrolls: piece of shit" or a big rigs: over the road.
If you judge bethesda's games as rpgs, then yes, they make shit.
Choices and consequences- lol woot?
Meaningful dialogue- lol woot?#2
 
The feedback we get in all its forms from the community only furthers our ability to understand what worked and what didn’t work so that we can do better next time.

Wouldn't it be better to try and listen BEFORE or while your are making the game instead of AFTER?

But hey we should be happy! We got a perk! :clap: :?
 
Yeah, I mean like... all this nitty gritty stuff (the way super-mutants look, the look of the weapons, the architecture) could be forgiven if they only had the core vision of Fallout down. And they've already f'ed that up.
 
Yellow said:
Yeah, I mean like... all this nitty gritty stuff (the way super-mutants look, the look of the weapons, the architecture) could be forgiven if they only had the core vision of Fallout down. And they've already f'ed that up.

Funny.. those are all (except the mutants, and those aren't so bad) things that I think they got pretty "right".
 
the supermutant ogre orcs suck, the look of the weapons is rather iffy (chinese AKs and weird laser rifles dont float my boat, but the bolt action rifle wasnt too bad, so there's hope), the architecture is very hit and miss (and when they get it right, they do it for the wrong thing, like the nuclear refueling station? ugh).
and the overall decaying feel? i dunno, too hard to compare with what i've seen. it's DC afterall, and not california, so the color palette is different by default. still, i feel a lot of their 'ruined' design is bland at this stage.
 
Xenophile said:
Funny.. those are all (except the mutants, and those aren't so bad) things that I think they got pretty "right".
You think? What? The AK's? Tell me of one similar weapon in either fallout, please. Buildings, can you please elaborate?
 
Back
Top