Fallout 1 BOS

I was talking about Fallout 3 damn it.

I know, I know, I tease. I think the BoS in Fallout 3 is interesting enough because while they're "idealistic", it's really just Elder Lyons, Sarah, the Lyons Pryde, and Star Paladin Cross. Everyone else is following Elder Lyons because he's the Elder and we saw how far that goes with the Outcasts.

It's actually a worthy point of discussion whether Elder Lyons was "right" to try to clean up the Wasteland as he sacrificed large numbers of his troopers for what amounts to a quest he imposed on them with no real knowledge they had the capacity to win.

The Capital Wasteland is BOS Vietnam!

*plays Fortunate Son*

I think it's interesting how Father Elijah is basically Elder Lyons without the Lone Wanderer to save his ass.
 
Father Elijah is voiced by my hero...

Except he's not. There's nothing idealistic in him by time you meet him.

Yes, because he's already lost everything. If Elder Lyons had lived to see himself lose his surrogate in Elijah's case/literal in Lyon's daughter leave him, his Brotherhood collapse, and all his ambitions destroyed with a death order on his head--he, too, would probably lose his idealism and become a monster.

Then again, I believe Father Elijah is a Fallen HeroTM and a once good man, not a person who was always a monster.
 
Fallen Hero? He never was a hero though...

Veronica certainly thought he was. A liberal reformer and a man who wanted the technology to save the BOS from their destruction at the hands of NCR.

Certainly, he's not a hero to the people in general but since when has that been a qualifier.
 
Because he was her tutor, bias much.

Eh, I find it less interesting if he was just always an asshole. Then again, I also think part of the point of the Sierra Madre is that everyone there is desperate and half-insane (if not completely) except you.
 
Eh, I find it less interesting if he was just always an asshole. Then again, I also think part of the point of the Sierra Madre is that everyone there is desperate and half-insane (if not completely) except you.
He wasn't always an asshole, jesus what kind of thinking makes you think there's only assholes and heroes. There's something inbetween.
 
He wasn't always an asshole, jesus what kind of thinking makes you think there's only assholes and heroes. There's something inbetween.

I believe every hero is another person's monster. :)

Certainly, there's an interesting story to be told if you had Elder Lyons having started the war with the Super Mutants. You could even argue there's in-game evidence with Little Lamplight next to the SM's Vault. Then again, a possibility there is the Super Mutants are just "harvesting" them when they reach of age, providing security until then.
 
I believe every hero is another person's monster. :)

Certainly, there's an interesting story to be told if you had Elder Lyons having started the war with the Super Mutants. You could even argue there's in-game evidence with Little Lamplight next to the SM's Vault. Then again, a possibility there is the Super Mutants are just "harvesting" them when they reach of age, providing security until then.
But there's more then heroes and monsters... you're thinking is so childlike sometimes...
 
It's actually a worthy point of discussion whether Elder Lyons was "right" to try to clean up the Wasteland as he sacrificed large numbers of his troopers for what amounts to a quest he imposed on them with no real knowledge they had the capacity to win.
I think this is something a lot of people can agree on.

I think it's right to call the writing of Fo3 bad, but the direction that the writing was trying to convey is really good and held a lot of potential, some of which we can see come out in Fallout 4, it felt like the eastern Brotherhood of Steel had some character growth through the two games, no matter how little it was.

Which brings me to say that despite everything Bethesda keeps doing wrong, I still have hope for the future.
 
I think this is something a lot of people can agree on.

I think it's right to call the writing of Fo3 bad, but the direction that the writing was trying to convey is really good and held a lot of potential, some of which we can see come out in Fallout 4, it felt like the eastern Brotherhood of Steel had some character growth through the two games, no matter how little it was.

Which brings me to say that despite everything Bethesda keeps doing wrong, I still have hope for the future.

Well, they changed a great deal. They became racist assholes.

:)
 
Yep, there should be a chaotic wild card ending. Sack the strip with a bunch of raiders and junkies. Maybe get one of the Three Families to ally with you and let you in. Rule the Mojave as a warlord from atop a pile of skulls in the Lucky 38.
NV has 186 endings.

NMA will never be satisfied.

And yeah that ending should be a thing.
 
I think if you were the original BOS, you would send the wasteland dregs on a suicide quest as well. Just think of the tactical advantage of the idiots lucky enough to find the bunker entrance. Instead of creating conflict at their front door they just send the morons to the glow, where they will be killed by invisible radiation far away from their bunker.

Therefore they don't generate localized hate against them specifically, by murdering random wanderers.
 
Well Dr ...no School like the Old School. Have to agree the writing in the originals is the best.

Personally I was always partial to the Tactics BOS faction. They were much more about surviving and adapting vs. the ever stringent typical BOS practices.

I would have enjoyed seeing them in the capital wasteland vs. Bethderps weird BOS bleeding hearts.

Had the Fo1 BOS survived long enough They would've grown to a point to have a militia/military like the TicTacs BOS. All though that's more of a thought than a theory.
 
Back
Top