Fallout 3 reviews round-up #69

Per

Vault Consort
Staff member
Admin
Gamer Quest blog, 9.<blockquote>My initial beginnings with the free roaming, open-ended, dialogue-branched, and large-scaled games of the Western-RPG genre are quite humble. Frankly, I always feel disengaged when I start playing one for several reasons, and one of them is the false sense of full control. Admittedly, these games do provide several tools and implements to the players, in which they are free to choose, create, and decide their preferable settings, but shortly after, those games don’t feel any different from any game that orders the players to perform certain tasks in certain methods. Although this isn’t entirely true with Fallout 3, but certainly, it is one of the few games (Fable II included) that leaves the most decisive selections to the players without imposing too much pressure (and eventually guilt) on them. This is a game that truly represents the proud raison d'être on why gamers play games in the first place.</blockquote>Game Flipped blog.<blockquote>Ultimately, Fallout 3 is a game that’s as fun as you make it. And that’s the greatest asset of Fallout 3: its narrative isn’t solely dependent on the main quest line. In fact, what I like the most about Fallout 3 is its oratorical nature. Trading stories with friends on what perks they invested in, how that affected their game, some of the crazy characters they ran into; it all inflates the otherwise desolate world into something epic.</blockquote>Console Obsession, 6/10.<blockquote>But as it stands, Fallout 3 is a broken game, with some frustrating issues. Away from this, the combat, the world and exploration are all real strengths of the game and if not the games complete saviour, they can certainly be considered as a saving grace. Potential buyers are recommended to wait for the incoming patch, which could very well transform the game into the fantastic game that, given its high quality in most areas, it has every right to be.</blockquote>Gaming Target, 9.0.<blockquote>By now, I'm sure you have read a majority of the reviews floating around the Internet. [Yes!! -Per] Most of them relate Bethesda's take on the Fallout franchise as an instant Game of the Year winner. I however, cannot say as much. It's not that Fallout 3 is a bad game in any right, other than a small number of technical issues, that is. It's that Fallout 3 doesn't do enough to distinguish itself from Bethesda's previous game, Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.

If you were ever going to copy an open world role-playing game, then yes, Oblivion should be on the top of your list. But what Bethesda did with Fallout 3 felt almost like they were too afraid to take a chance on the game by almost mirroring everything about Oblivion, just in the Fallout world.</blockquote>Reporter Online.<blockquote>All in all, the story’s presentation is aces. The introduction sequence alone might be one of the most immersive experiences that you will ever encounter in a video game.

Overall, Fallout 3 is a brilliant game in several ways with only a few minor flaws (mostly graphical) that the most dedicated of gamers won’t even notice.</blockquote>Two Crazy Gamers blog, 9/10.<blockquote>The game is great overall. It's definitely a buy for all RPG, Bethesda, and Fallout fans. This game does justice to the Fallout franchise and makes it one of the top games of 2008. If it does win some awards this year they would have to be innovation and design.</blockquote>Al Menconi Ministries.<blockquote>Fallout 3 has been getting a lot of praise from critics and rightly so. The game plays very well and there is a lot to do to keep you busy for a long time. Personally, however, I found Fallout 3 to be too dark for my taste. Because of the strong violence, strong language and the ability to kill innocent life if so desired, my recommendation to parents is that Fallout 3 is a game best left to mature audiences only.</blockquote>In anticipation of the Polish edition, the Swedish sub-edition!

Cogito campus magazine/blog.<blockquote>In the end we can sum up Fallout 3 as yet another bought-up, watered-down and pooped-out gaming license. But the game is despite all this and a few other flaws a good game. At times it will pull you in for hours and at times you'll wish you'd donated your hard-earned money to the Red Cross instead of shelling out for a stupid game.</blockquote>Aftonbladet, 4/5.<blockquote>Your goal is to find your missing father. But Bethesda – the people behind the brilliant role-playing game "Oblivion" – are the world's most generous developers. They've bombarded "Fallout 3" with so much mythology, warped characters and entertaining side missions that you risk never finding him.</blockquote>Arbetarbladet, 4/5.<blockquote>Bethesda have outdone themselves and their ”Mad Max” vision feels far more accomplished than their open fantasy game ”The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion”. ”Fallout 3” is irresistibly beautiful and immediately pulls the player into a fantastic and perilous journey, where a new adventure lurks behind every corner. Personally I find it a near masterpiece.</blockquote>Spelkontroll, 8/10.<blockquote>Fallout 3 doesn't live up to its predecessors in any way. It's not the same game. Instead it should be viewed as a sibling of Oblivion, what Oblivion should have been in another world. It's not a genuine Fallout game but it retains the humour and some of the old atmosphere. Playing Fallout 3 is fun and that's what's most important.

If you like exploring a big world, having a lot of freedom and games with action and blood from a first person perspective, Fallout 3 is a must. If you want a really good RPG, you should perhaps look elsewhere.</blockquote>Barometern, 4/5.<blockquote>Bethesda, who are behind both games, have borrowed heavily from themselves here and to a large extent you could say Fallout 3 is Oblivion in another environment. A whole other environment. The karma mode is also taken from Oblivion. Your character radiates trust if you're good enough and suspicion if you're mean. You choose.</blockquote>
 
Arbetarbladet, 4/5.<blockquote>Bethesda have outdone themselves and their ”Mad Max” vision feels far more accomplished than their open fantasy game ”The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion”. ”Fallout 3” is irresistibly beautiful and immediately pulls the player into a fantastic and perilous journey, where a new adventure lurks behind every corner. Personally I find it a near masterpiece.</blockquote>

dude, where do you find these? Arbetarbladet is a local newspaper in my home town Gävle, Sweden. I can assure you some 17 year old kid wrote that review.
 
aenemic said:
I can assure you some 17 year old kid wrote that review.

A 17-year-old kid with a media megaphone! Do local newspapers rank above or below random blogs, anyway?
 
Per said:
aenemic said:
I can assure you some 17 year old kid wrote that review.

A 17-year-old kid with a media megaphone! Do local newspapers rank above or below random blogs, anyway?

about the same I'd say. in the end, reviews are only opinions. and opinions are like assholes: mine is the only decent one (however, it does stink from time to time).

oh, and lol @ me for failed quote above.
 
I can ask where there hell the admin of nma know of all this blogs/reviews pages ??? i mean how you can know about 69# pages with almost 5 reference of extrange pages.


Anyone know???
 
Hey, If I posted my rating/review of the game would you guys post it and give it a nifty #? : ) Cmon!
 
Save_the_Mutos said:
69 is the best review roundup. 8-)

To be honest, I can't see differences between this roundup and the previous 68.

And the "69" thing doesn't make it cool :P
 
The introduction sequence alone might be one of the most immersive experiences that you will ever encounter in a video game.

That reviewer lost credibility on using the word "immersive", in my opinion. That's a word that is leftover from the early days of 3D gaming when some developers were playing with the idea that a realistic enough environment might be enough, in and of itself. It isn't, and no self respecting gamer (let alone reviewer) should ever use that term. You can suck people in with a good enough illusion, but when it stops working (it always does, and it doesn't take very long for most people to stop "oohing" and "ahhing" over realism) then you damn well better have some content to fall back on. This has ALWAYS been Bethesda's biggest weakness.... they are the best around at creating game worlds, but they are also amongst the worst at providing reasons to the player why they should even be playing the game at all, other than brainless repetitive combat and pointless exploration.

All that said, Fallout 3 is a better game than Oblivion in my opinion. I made it halfway through the game before I had "this is pointless" syndrome. If I hadn't restarted several times (bad habit of mine) I might have made it all the way through.

Bottomline, it was a damn good effort considering the developer was bethesda. I wish like hell Bethesda would fire everyone except the engine programmers and world designers, and Bioware would fire everyone except the storyline folks, and the two would form a partnership. They'd complement eachother perfectly. Bioware games always have rich and compelling storylines, with game worlds that feel dead and non-interactive. Can you imagine how great Fallout 3 would have been, if Bioware had been subcontracted to do the actual game, using Bethesda's game engine?

I used to want Fallout 3 to be a game that used the Jagged Alliance 2 engine + Black Isle's design team. It's been too long and that wouldn't work now even if Sirtech and Black isle were still around, but I can dream about a Fallout 4 that has best-of features from multiple developers, can't I? Why is it that game developers are always oblivious to the things other people do better than them, anyway? They always want to do it all, in house, the same way they did it before... no matter how much they come up short in some areas...
 
The karma mode is also taken from Oblivion.
No.

If you want a really good RPG, you should perhaps look elsewhere.
Yes.

I found Fallout 3 to be too dark for my taste. Because of the strong violence, strong language and the ability to kill innocent life if so desired, my recommendation to parents is that Fallout 3 is a game best left to mature audiences only.
Duh....

Ok, can blogs even be considered "reviews"? It's mostly just some guy talking about how much they loved the best game ever made by the gods at Bethesda...
 
Maybe you included it earlier, one of Swedens largest newspapers, DN, gave it a 5/5. Their reviewer thinks it is "pure poetry".

An example of his bullshit:
"A few years ago the bomb was dropped - excuse my pun - that Bethesda would make part three of fallout. I don't know what I should compare that to. Peter Greenway making a new version of Citizen Kane? Anyway, it's Bethesda, the developer of the increasingly ambitious elder scrolls games"
 
Jenx said:
Ok, can blogs even be considered "reviews"?

In a fashion. Like newspapers, campus papers and the like they provide an alternative viewpoint from the professional gaming magazines and gaming sites. It's only to be expected that most are positive because like it or not, most of anything are positive about this game. In any case, there's no clear progression from random blogs to dedicated gaming blogs to multi-user blogs to gamer zines to small gaming communities to semi-professional gaming sites.

Dead Guy said:
Maybe you included it earlier, one of Swedens largest newspapers, DN, gave it a 5/5.

Yup.
 
Dead Guy said:
Maybe you included it earlier, one of Swedens largest newspapers, DN, gave it a 5/5. Their reviewer thinks it is "pure poetry".

An example of his bullshit:
"A few years ago the bomb was dropped - excuse my pun - that Bethesda would make part three of fallout. I don't know what I should compare that to. Peter Greenway making a new version of Citizen Kane? Anyway, it's Bethesda, the developer of the increasingly pretty but banal elder scrolls games"
Fixed.
 
Back
Top