Starseeker
Vault Senior Citizen
The Taiwanese Presidential Election goes off on the Jan. 14, which is the starting gun of all the important elections in 2012.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...n-elections-loom/story-e6frg6so-1226238529996
President Ma has a lot of similarity with President Obama. They both won by a landslide after 8 years of contentious opposition rule, and they are both facing stiff competition after said popularity wanes with parts of population moves on to skepticism.
As for Taiwan itself, it is ironic that the only democratic country in the Chinese speaking world has less support diplomatically than than a communist one, but that's another topic all together. As election goes, what does this mean for the rest of the world if either wins or loses? (Taiwan also has one of the highest voting rates among the democratic world. In my understanding, higher voting rates decrease the chances of voting blocks and special interest groups gaining special political clouts or favours)
The Candidates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China_presidential_election,_2012
As for what the issues are and why it might be important to the west, I found an interesting report from CSIS:
http://csis.org/files/publication/111114_Glaser_Taiwan2012_WEB.pdf
And last but not least, a very, very interesting analysis of the Taiwanese situation I found by accident from a very unlikely source, Turkish Weekly:
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/129504/-analysis-taiwanís-presidential-elections-and-turkey.html
He made some intriguing comparisons between Turkey and Taiwan, and used some very concise words to present the Taiwan situation and its march to Democracy. As he said, Taiwanese democracy is remarkable in the sense that there were no equivalent of Arab Springs and military uprisings in its process. I don't know if the situation is unique but it is a sharp contrast to the Arab Springs movement.
We shall see the election result in a week, would this result be a forecast of things to come in the US, as the war drums of Republican nomination beats, only time will tell.
Finally a decent write up by the times:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2103707-1,00.html
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...n-elections-loom/story-e6frg6so-1226238529996
President Ma Ying-jeou vulnerable as Taiwan elections loom
by: Rowan Callick
From: The Australian
January 07, 2012 12:00AM
THE world's first important elections this year take place next Saturday.
The outcome matters less than the fact they are taking place at all, for the presidential and parliamentary elections in Taiwan comprise the pinnacle of democratic process in the Chinese-speaking world.
The results will affect the less public transition in October to a new leadership in the People's Republic of China, where the Communist Party power groups, led by the People's Liberation Army, maintain an intense interest in the long game of bringing - returning, they would say - Taiwan under Chinese sovereignty.
The presidential contest has every sign of running right down to the line. The incumbent, centre-right Kuomintang (KMT, Nationalist) leader Ma Ying-jeou, is in most polls rating just above 40 per cent, with his chief opponent Tsai Ing-wen, leader of the centre-left Democratic Progressive Party, in the mid-30s, while veteran James Soong, founder of the right-leaning People First Party, has about 6 per cent.
At the last election, Ma won comfortably, by 2.2 million votes out of 13 million cast, with 58.5 per cent of the total, against the DPP's Frank Hsieh, who was burdened by voters' fatigue after the DPP's eight years in power under president Chen Shui-bian. The latter was already clouded by graft charges and has since been jailed.
Last time, 76 per cent of 17.3 million eligible voters turned out. Next Saturday, the likeable Ma faces a more formidable opponent in Tsai, the first woman candidate for the top job, and one who shares a remarkably similar profile. Both are from well-off "mainland" families, both are comparatively wealthy, both were educated at top Western universities - Tsai with a master's from Cornell and a doctorate from the London School of Economics, Ma with a master's from New York University and a doctorate from Harvard.
President Ma has a lot of similarity with President Obama. They both won by a landslide after 8 years of contentious opposition rule, and they are both facing stiff competition after said popularity wanes with parts of population moves on to skepticism.
As for Taiwan itself, it is ironic that the only democratic country in the Chinese speaking world has less support diplomatically than than a communist one, but that's another topic all together. As election goes, what does this mean for the rest of the world if either wins or loses? (Taiwan also has one of the highest voting rates among the democratic world. In my understanding, higher voting rates decrease the chances of voting blocks and special interest groups gaining special political clouts or favours)
The Candidates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China_presidential_election,_2012
As for what the issues are and why it might be important to the west, I found an interesting report from CSIS:
http://csis.org/files/publication/111114_Glaser_Taiwan2012_WEB.pdf
And last but not least, a very, very interesting analysis of the Taiwanese situation I found by accident from a very unlikely source, Turkish Weekly:
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/129504/-analysis-taiwanís-presidential-elections-and-turkey.html
He made some intriguing comparisons between Turkey and Taiwan, and used some very concise words to present the Taiwan situation and its march to Democracy. As he said, Taiwanese democracy is remarkable in the sense that there were no equivalent of Arab Springs and military uprisings in its process. I don't know if the situation is unique but it is a sharp contrast to the Arab Springs movement.
We shall see the election result in a week, would this result be a forecast of things to come in the US, as the war drums of Republican nomination beats, only time will tell.
Finally a decent write up by the times:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2103707-1,00.html
Neither Independence nor Unification
By Zoher Abdoolcarim Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012
When I was in Taipei recently to talk to Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou and his chief rival, Tsai Ing-wen, about their prospects in the island's Jan. 14 elections, I dropped by the elegantly understated Fine Arts Museum. It was showing works by the global Chinese icon Ai Weiwei. All his signature pieces and installations so celebrated worldwide were on display: the bronze Circle of Animals/Zodiac Heads, the Coca-Cola urn, the catholic portraiture, an upgraded (specially for Taipei) Forever Bicycles.
To spotlight Ai's inability to attend, the exhibition was called "Ai Weiwei absent." Ai has become one of Beijing's public enemies for his outspokenness about what's wrong with China: he was jailed for nearly three months last year. Once, Ai was a darling of the Chinese establishment, but now it's inconceivable that any Ai event would be allowed in China or its supposedly autonomous satellites Hong Kong and Macau. Taiwan, which mainland China claims as part of the People's Republic, stands apart. That Ai's art has found a home — indeed, a refuge — on the island precisely during its intense election season makes total sense: Ai has an independent spirit, and so does Taiwan. (Read excerpts from TIME's exclusive interviews with Taiwan's presidential hopefuls.)
There's another parallel. Also like Ai, Taiwan is caged. The People's Republic insists that it is the "one China," and most governments and multilateral institutions comply. As a consequence, Taiwan is not acknowledged as a sovereign entity, operates in deeply restricted international space and is often underrated or simply off the world's radar. Yet Taiwan's coming contests for the presidency and the legislature — the first of some two dozen elections taking place worldwide in 2012 — remind us that this small island matters big time to the global community.
Economically, Taiwan punches above its weight. Its IT industries, for example, rank among the biggest anywhere, as does its hoard of foreign-exchange reserves. Geopolitically, it is a perennial potential flash point. For the Chinese leadership and most mainland Chinese, Taiwan is a charged issue. Beijing has labeled Taiwan a renegade province that one day must return to the motherland, by force if necessary. (By some estimates, China has as many as 2,000 missiles locked and aimed at Taiwan.) Washington, through Congress's 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, is obliged to help arm the island. Whenever the U.S. sells Taipei military hardware, especially warplanes, China vehemently protests the action as interference in its internal affairs. Conflict over Taiwan between the two powers, while improbable, cannot be ruled out. (Read "How Will China React to U.S. Arms Deal with Taiwan?")
There's a more crucial, cosmic element to Taiwan. It is worth defending, if not as a territory, then as an idea: that freedom is compatible with the Chinese world. Taiwan could do a better job strengthening rule of law and fighting corruption. But in many stellar ways, it is the un-China: a vigorous democracy; an alternative fount of Chinese language and culture; an arena of fiercely competitive (and partisan) media; a crucible of creativity (tech, film, food); a haven of environmental consciousness (you'll find recycling bins on remote hilltops). Heck, even the people are nicer — literally a civil society. China has muscle; Taiwan has soul. It's the true people's republic.
Taiwan's voice, particularly during elections, is strong enough to reverberate even on the mainland. The islanders take politics very seriously — it seems to suffuse their lives — because they know their votes really count. In the presidential contest, the 99% figure a great deal: Tsai and her opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) accuse Ma and his ruling Kuomintang (KMT) of pandering to Big Business and ignoring income inequality. But beyond livelihood issues, the giant shadow of the mainland looms largest. The elections are, in truth, a referendum on China.