ThatZenoGuy
Residential Zealous Evolved Nano Organism
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Oh I feel sorry for the stupid-fucks who bought this piece of shit.
For Honour...2017 and still using Peer To Peer multiplayer.
- Thread starter ThatZenoGuy
- Start date
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Oh I feel sorry for the stupid-fucks who bought this piece of shit.
aenemic
Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!
Can't believe people are willing to buy another Ubisoft online multiplayer game after the mess that was The Division.
Not only because of the inept handling of online connectivity, but also for the sheer lack of content. Just as with The Division, after watching a few minutes of gameplay of this it's obvious that you've seen basically all the game has to offer. Good concept but it'd become incredibly repetitive after an hour.
Not only because of the inept handling of online connectivity, but also for the sheer lack of content. Just as with The Division, after watching a few minutes of gameplay of this it's obvious that you've seen basically all the game has to offer. Good concept but it'd become incredibly repetitive after an hour.
ThatZenoGuy
Residential Zealous Evolved Nano Organism
*Corporate shill mode activated*
H-Hey!
They're GOING to make a campaign, and its going to be great, just have some faith man!
Buy the game right fucking now or you're a hater, you stupid anti-fanboy!
Its 'only' AAA price for a game which has about five minutes of content, what do you want from these poor developers? Actual gameplay worth playing? You weird fucking deviant.
What are you talking about, its the best melee game ever, look at all the moves you can do! Heavy and light attacks, and 3 generic stances which make you focus on one tiny set of arrows instead of the entire world and ugly character designs we have made!
Ediros
Water Chip? Been There, Done That
At this point I am not even surprised. People always buy overhyped game and it seems like it will never change.
If I wanted test of skills, I would play dark souls not a game with multiplayer after division.
It was dull, poorly handled and did not keep my interest. I must be weird since the only multiplayer game I used to play is dota 2.
For honour is like that vampire game in legacy of kain universe, where 2 teams fight against each other. I got bored after few hours and have not touched it since.
If I wanted test of skills, I would play dark souls not a game with multiplayer after division.
It was dull, poorly handled and did not keep my interest. I must be weird since the only multiplayer game I used to play is dota 2.
For honour is like that vampire game in legacy of kain universe, where 2 teams fight against each other. I got bored after few hours and have not touched it since.
ThatZenoGuy
Residential Zealous Evolved Nano Organism
By the way guys, I have a friend online who bought this garbage, and while he 'likes it' (9_9), it apparently makes him angry enough to throw shit around in reality.
I suppose that's the types of people who buy this shit in the first place, mindless drones willing to buy anything a developer throws at them.
If I wanted a fucking melee game, I'd buy Mount and Blade (oh wait, I already have it ;D), or Chivalry.
Fuck, the damage mechanics in Mount and blade are better anyway, AND THERE IS BOWS and shit.
Games like this make me genuinely sad.
Less options, shitty deisgns, no singleplayer worth mentioning, full price, antiquated multiplayer system since...What? 1990's? There's been dedicated servers for fucking centuries, made by what is basically EA, but with even more flat out lies, and finally its unbalanced as shit, even by fucking indie standards.
What POSSIBLE upside is there to this game?
The combat? Which takes about 40 seconds to master?
The graphics? Irrelevant because you'll be staring at 3 arrows for hours on end?
What am I missing?
This actually reminds me a lot of Fallout 4's game design planning.
1: Take a genre from a hat.
2: Make it dumber than games released 5+ years ago.
3: For good measure make the game useless if no one else plays it (No singleplayer)
4: Let the game die off.
5: Repeat.
Who is so fucking stupid to buy this crap? Titanfall 1 showed that a multiplayer only game which has no real replayability dies off within a year, fuck, evolve showed that too...
And yet I can find Left for Dead 2 games within a minute.
A couple years ago, I found AVP2 servers which were still populated! That's a game who's official servers were fucking shut down and its still being played!
I suppose that's the types of people who buy this shit in the first place, mindless drones willing to buy anything a developer throws at them.
If I wanted a fucking melee game, I'd buy Mount and Blade (oh wait, I already have it ;D), or Chivalry.
Fuck, the damage mechanics in Mount and blade are better anyway, AND THERE IS BOWS and shit.
Games like this make me genuinely sad.
Less options, shitty deisgns, no singleplayer worth mentioning, full price, antiquated multiplayer system since...What? 1990's? There's been dedicated servers for fucking centuries, made by what is basically EA, but with even more flat out lies, and finally its unbalanced as shit, even by fucking indie standards.
What POSSIBLE upside is there to this game?
The combat? Which takes about 40 seconds to master?
The graphics? Irrelevant because you'll be staring at 3 arrows for hours on end?
What am I missing?
This actually reminds me a lot of Fallout 4's game design planning.
1: Take a genre from a hat.
2: Make it dumber than games released 5+ years ago.
3: For good measure make the game useless if no one else plays it (No singleplayer)
4: Let the game die off.
5: Repeat.
Who is so fucking stupid to buy this crap? Titanfall 1 showed that a multiplayer only game which has no real replayability dies off within a year, fuck, evolve showed that too...
And yet I can find Left for Dead 2 games within a minute.
A couple years ago, I found AVP2 servers which were still populated! That's a game who's official servers were fucking shut down and its still being played!