Szeder said:I don't think that this is all there is to it.
Of course.
Szeder said:Would you call a painting a piece of art? Most people would, and it is agreed upon that paintings are not primarily entertainment mediums.
It's not really that relevant if it's entertaining or not. Someone might be annoyed by a painting or a game where others find it entertaining.
Szeder said:Graphics, musical notes, texts etc are made up of a lot of different things. What makes them pieces of art is that the artist managed to blend them in a complete whole, or an incomplete whole for that matter.
That's right, he succeeded (or didn't) in presenting them to his/her viewers through medium.
Let me remind you...
Medium - An intervening substance through which something else is transmitted or carried on.
Szeder said:Fallout is a piece of art because the creators managed to combine music, graphics, texts etc. into a coherent game.
I'm not really convinced.
Alright, try to explain me why is Fallout a piece of art. Like you're writing an encyclopedia entry about it or something. Then I might see your point.
Szeder said:In other words, art can serve entertainment purposes and entertaiment mediums can be considered art. I think there are no strict borders, especially nowadays...
Which reminds us once again about the theory that modern man doesn't really know what he/she wants.