Is any one angrey about Fallout 2's vault city endings?

N

ngtank

First time out of the vault
I remember first playing this game and I tried everything to let NCR own vault city. I just found out there is a way to do this, but you cant save gecko if you do that. I dont know why I am still angry, but I am. Does any one feel like NCR is a hope for America and they had every right to take over vault city?
 
I agree wholeheartedly. NCR seemed to want to take us towards a peaceful future, while those greedy butt holes over in VC were just repeating the mistakes of the past for a profit. I know I'd sooner trust a ranger than some guards who are always mumbling about "outworlder trash".
 
Shooting VC is tried and true.

I think what you have to consider in this storyline is not what you want to happen, ngtank, but how difficult the situation is. VC considers itself stuck between a rock and a hard place, having to deal with Gecko and NCR. So yes, they have to be convinced.

That said, you are incorrect, it is possible to save both Gecko and VC. Spoiler, possible VC endings:
Vault City

1. Population driven to NCR by radiation: Don't fix the power plant (blowing it up works too).
2. VC independent, Westin and Lynette marry (!): Fix the power plant, kill the raiders, expose Bishop's plan and deliver the two holodisks but do not collect the final reward from Randal (bug), and don't kill Westin or Lynette (obviously).
3. VC annexed by NCR: Fix the power plant, don't bring the Account Book or Bishop's Holodisk to Lynette.
4. VC becomes part of NCR: Fix the power plant, kill the raiders and bring the Account Book or Bishop's Holodisk to Lynette. (You get this one if you fail to get ending 2 for any reason, e.g. killing Westin or picking up the reward.)
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top