Is Inane Insane? You Decide!

And it is rather typical of pseudo-scientists, conspiracy theorists, and assorted crackpots to say that everyone who doesn't understand their particular lunacy is "close minded."

Of course, the burden of proof relies on those who make such claims. I am certainly under no obligation to believe anyone based on words alone. If Brian demonstrates his "Free Energy" machine successfully, then perhaps I would be more open-minded. Instead, we hear about how the energy cartels suppress such knowledge.

By the way, still waiting on proof about the black boxes, though we all know that isn't going to be forthcoming.

You know, they say a computer is "booting up," yet a boot is nowhere involved in the process. Another conspiracy? All we have for explanation is that it derives from a phrase which was itself derived from a Baron Munchausen tale, a bit thin, don't you think?
 
Damn, and I thought *I* was the crazy doomsaying conspiracy theorist here. Inane, the way you aggressively shove information down everybody's throat and insult those who aren't quick to embrace your unsubstantiated bullshit (I don't think a slightly disturbed dude named Brian qualifies as "credible source") as ultimate truth won't make anyone warm up to your stance. In fact, your behaviour is disgraceful and intolerable. Idiots like you are the main reason why conspiracy theorists have a reputation of rude, overly assertive whackos. You are truly an embarrassment. Do all conspiracy theorists a favor and go jump from a flying airplane (you can disassemble a black box while you're at it).
 
inane said:
Well it's typical of people who are closed minded to ridicule what they do not understand. I don't know whether or not to believe that about him but it's not my right to judge and I refuse to deny that there's a spiritual world or alien worlds, in fact I'm Taoist so I CANNOT.

Liar. (In fact, I could pretty much say "How dare you?") Else you would strive to not make gross un-harmonious inaccuracies like this:

inane said:
Ever wonder why there hasn't been a major commercial crash on land since the sixties? I have and I've discovered why. If you believe that all the people on a flight would allow hijackers to take a plane with box cutters you're a fucking moron.

You do not bother to use any sense of reason in your connection there, instead you seem to equate commercial land crashes = hijackers. Do you care to know how many Taoist principles you violate in that alone? Or how about in the rest of your rather ignorant tirade and other crass quantifications? There is also no Harmonious Action involved with unsubstantial bullshit without any backing - pholisophy is one thing, bullshit like Scientology is another. I also find it amusing that you could believe that someone could pull "free energy" out from their ass without proof, because one of the fundamental aspects of Taoism is Cyclical Growth. Cause, effect, death and birth.

You do not pursue reason and fact, instead you seek conflict without purpose instead of the search for reason and harmony in the world. Taoist my ass. So I will be doing the Taoist thing, and achieve balance again by banning an idiot when they won't bother to back themselves up with references like others have.

Oh and Wooz, you prejudice moron, the only thing I ever listen to in my car is NPR and I have subscriptions to only three known commercial publications, The Las Vegas Journal, Newsweek and the The New York Times (west coast edition). Fuck off and go watch some more Fox News Channel.

NPR is often even more biased and clueless than Fox News. Brilliant!

Now, get a clue or goodbye.
 
Roshambo said:
inane said:
Well it's typical of people who are closed minded to ridicule what they do not understand...

Liar. (In fact, I could pretty much say "How dare you?") Else you would strive to not make gross un-harmonious inaccuracies like this:

inane said:
Ever wonder why there hasn't been a major commercial crash on land since the sixties...

You do not bother to use any sense of reason in your connection there, instead you seem to equate commercial land crashes = hijackers. Do you care to know how many Taoist principles you violate in that alone? Or how about in the rest of your rather ignorant tirade and other crass quantifications? There is also no Harmonious Action involved with unsubstantial bullshit without any backing - pholisophy is one thing, bullshit like Scientology is another. I also find it amusing that you could believe that someone could pull "free energy" out from their ass without proof, because one of the fundamental aspects of Taoism is Cyclical Growth. Cause, effect, death and birth...


Don't claim to understand what you don't Roshambo. Growth isn't even in the vocabulary.

Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.
Existence without limitation is space. Continuity without a starting point is time. There is birth, there is death, there is issuing forth, there is entering in. That through which one passes in and out without seeing its form, that is the Portal of God. -Chuang Tzu 23


Taoism isn't the automatic gangsay of new view points. It also doesn't teach you to ignore new viable view points. What everyone is telling me here are propositions which are common and TYPICAL.

My main point for bringing up Taoism was that it teaches me that there ARE spirit worlds but that we do not know all of them.

Being Taoist does NOT automatically make you more peaceable or non argumentative. It is a LONG process with which my being 23 years old should show that I probably wouldn't be far along in following it's teachings but that does not mean that I do not hold it's constituents in my heart, it means that I am hard headed and have a long way to go. Pretty much I'm an asshole when it comes to these type of things but I'm better than 2 years ago and I wouldn't make a pimple on a monks butt.

Besides, find me one overland crash involving a commercial jet (that being one with a black box; terrorist or otherwise) in the US since the sixties. We're speaking of a buzz buzz plane in the air overland coming down. Look at the numbers in any other country and also take into account how many flights there are in the US compared to these other countries SINCE the sixties. Anyway, no one seems to even want to listen or use previously observed info from their learning past to realize how utterly bizarre this is.

NPR is far from being biased, I don't know where in the hell you get that from. I'm closest to what you might call a libertarian, so are you saying that that NPR is biased toward a libertarian perspective?

Name one report from NPR which is biased if it's sometimes more biased than Fox. Sorry it's also common knowledge that Fox news IS biased but this is the first I've heard of NPR being biased from anyone outside of the Republican Party...
 
Could we fork the chicken thread and join the bird flu discussion into this one?

I don't think his ego can handle the possibility of spreading all that bullshit across that many threads.
 
Ashmo said:
Could we fork the chicken thread and join the bird flu discussion into this one?

I don't think his ego can handle the possibility of spreading all that bullshit across that many threads.


HAHA you're right... anyway I'm WAY too fucking happy to care about this thread anymore!! :)
 
Oh and Wooz, you prejudice moron

Comedy gold in itself. Becomes platinum juxtaposed with the following sentence:

the only thing I ever listen to in my car is NPR and I have subscriptions to only three known commercial publications

"Prejudiced" allright.


You bore me, mageling. Mouthing off doesn't improve your already laughable situation.

and go watch some more Fox News Channel.

I don't watch television, let alone Fucks News. Your "Harder Core Than Thou" attitude, coupled with the Rebel Rage(TM) is amusing.

What's going to be even more amusing will be your pathetic attempts to "prove a point" to Roshambo by insults, writing words in Caps Lock, pulling far-eastern thinkers' quotes out of your ass and typing obscenely stupid "truths" about magic black boxes, life and death, and for some reason, 9/11.
 
Wooz said:
Oh and Wooz, you prejudice moron

Comedy gold in itself. Becomes platinum juxtaposed with the following sentence:

the only thing I ever listen to in my car is NPR and I have subscriptions to only three known commercial publications

"Prejudiced" allright.


You bore me, mageling. Mouthing off doesn't improve your already laughable situation.

and go watch some more Fox News Channel.

I don't watch television, let alone Fucks News. Your "Harder Core Than Thou" attitude, coupled with the Rebel Rage(TM) is amusing.

What's going to be even more amusing will be your pathetic attempts to "prove a point" to Roshambo by insults, writing words in Caps Lock, pulling far-eastern thinkers' quotes out of your ass and typing obscenely stupid "truths" about magic black boxes, life and death, and for some reason, 9/11.

I've listened to other radio and I don't like their programming of commercials and music I don't like, that doesn't make me prejudice.

Good for you, I'm glad to hear you don't watch the boob tube. How does anything of what I said make me sound more harder core than thou? It makes me sound more like a fucking geek if anything.

How is it obscenely stupid? You should sit and read what I wrote. The tech is there, they'd be stupid NOT to use it for what I'd said. Ok, sorry Roshambo, I'll drop it now.
 
inane said:
Look at the numbers in any other country and also take into account how many flights there are in the US compared to these other countries SINCE the sixties. Anyway, no one seems to even want to listen or use previously observed info from their learning past to realize how utterly bizarre this is.

Could the better saftey record have something to do with say... Better maintenence practices and stricter controlls on parts manufactureing (and the almost total illimination of the use of counterfit parts)?

Oh, and as for an overland crash in the US. since the sixties...
"8. May 25, 1979. As an American Airlines DC-10 lifts from the runway at Chicago's O'Hare airport, an engine detaches and seriously damages a wing. Before its crew can make sense of the situation, the airplane rolls 90 degrees and disintegrates in a huge fireball about a mile beyond the runway. With 273 fatalities, this remains the worst-ever crash on US soil. Both the engine pylon design and airline maintenance procedures were faulted by NTSB investigators, and all DC-10s were temporarily grounded."

That was taken from here: http://www.bootsnall.com/guides/05-06/ten-worst-airplane-crashes-in-history.html

but if that's STILL not enough for you... I believe THIS qualifies as an "overland" plane crash.

01-22-05 - OVERLAND PARK, Kan. (AP) — A twin-engine plane crashed shortly after takeoff and was reduced to "bits and pieces" after it crashed into a home in a Kansas City suburb, killing all five people on board and leaving a fiery trail of destruction in the well-to-do neighborhood.

Spotted here: http://www.crouselaw.com/news.html
 
inane said:
Don't claim to understand what you don't Roshambo. Growth isn't even in the vocabulary.

Birth is not a beginning; death is not an end. There is existence without limitation; there is continuity without a starting point.
Existence without limitation is space. Continuity without a starting point is time. There is birth, there is death, there is issuing forth, there is entering in. That through which one passes in and out without seeing its form, that is the Portal of God. -Chuang Tzu 23

Context, fuckwit, context.

I also find it amusing that you could believe that someone could pull "free energy" out from their ass without proof, because one of the fundamental aspects of Taoism is Cyclical Growth. Cause, effect, death and birth...

I was also using a more personally preferred translation, as growth is the best in meaning to many disciplines - as when something stops growing, then it is truly lost to the world. All growth is as a direct result from something else, through the death of something else, in a cyclical growth cycle, which is represented in the most common Taoist symbol.

In essence, a never-ending circle with only points to mark out events, as mankind follows the same circle in all aspects of life and death, evolving in both personal wisdom and balance, spiritual evolution and harmony.

In your stride to prove me wrong, you lost balance, and therefore your point is thrown into chaos.

Taoism isn't the automatic gangsay of new view points. It also doesn't teach you to ignore new viable view points. What everyone is telling me here are propositions which are common and TYPICAL.

My main point for bringing up Taoism was that it teaches me that there ARE spirit worlds but that we do not know all of them.

And Taoism becomes a reason for the possibility that this crap is true, despite NO evidence given to back it up?

That has less to do with Taoism and even less to do with logic.

Being Taoist does NOT automatically make you more peaceable or non argumentative.

Interesting that you make that assumption, but Taoism is the path of balance with self and the universe. So then why would you keep making baseless, illogical, and unwise comments that have no factual background behind them?

It is a LONG process with which my being 23 years old should show that I probably wouldn't be far along in following it's teachings but that does not mean that I do not hold it's constituents in my heart,

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Right. It is obvious that you are not far enough to really be making such claims.

it means that I am hard headed and have a long way to go.

At 23 years old?\, still have a long way of understanding...oh! I get it. You're just now Taoist because it's another one of those "in" things like Wicca.

Pretty much I'm an asshole when it comes to these type of things but I'm better than 2 years ago and I wouldn't make a pimple on a monks butt.

You're still far from being something we'd care to have here. Really. I'd also like to congratulate you for fucking up your FMF application in being a twat to the other hopeful recruits. At least they were honest, instead of taking their rejection out on others like you did - very Pseudo-Taoist of you.

Besides, find me one overland crash involving a commercial jet (that being one with a black box; terrorist or otherwise) in the US since the sixties. We're speaking of a buzz buzz plane in the air overland coming down. Look at the numbers in any other country and also take into account how many flights there are in the US compared to these other countries SINCE the sixties. Anyway, no one seems to even want to listen or use previously observed info from their learning past to realize how utterly bizarre this is.

OMG! And there's now Africanized bees in Texas, so therefore the Central American drug cartels are trying to kill us off with coked-up bees! OMFG!

Would you mean crashes like this one, in 1999? An article that claims it was the first since '97? You know, the one flight with a possibility that you are likely basing all of this garbage on? (TWA 800)

I'll say this again for your benefit. Land crashes are irrelevant of being hijacked or not. In fact, the point of...well, I have to quote it again because it is so fucking comical:

Ever wonder why there hasn't been a major commercial crash on land since the sixties? I have and I've discovered why. If you believe that all the people on a flight would allow hijackers to take a plane with box cutters you're a fucking moron.

So the reason why there hasn't been accidents (which there has) since the 60's is because people stand up to the people with box cutters?

No, the fact that people averted the disaster would have been known, especially after incidents like a flight attendant being attacked by a passenger. Or you might want to try your moronic logic on those who have been hijacked before in the US, before 9/11, and during the time when you claim your ignorant garbage. You know, like the '72 hijacking in San Fran that you are too young to have remembered. See article quoted at bottom.

Now you are proven to be a liar and a bullshit artist, and you speak untruths wildly in a way no self-respecting Taoist could claim, or for that matter, for anyone to claim being a Taoist after that bullshit. I also can't believe anyone of 23 years could be this fucking stupid.

How is it obscenely stupid? You should sit and read what I wrote. The tech is there, they'd be stupid NOT to use it for what I'd said. Ok, sorry Roshambo, I'll drop it now.

It would be all over Usenet, or all over a number of independent scientific sites. Considering it is not and there is jack shit to prove it - guess what? It's to be considered a load of shit until it is proven.

For a "Taoist", you certainly have a lot of work if you're ever going to learn the balance of the world, because you know jack shit for reason, logic, and wisdom in all forms. There is no way you can excuse your bullshit mentality on "some religion I hope to bluff myself out of this mess with", including the pathetic use of some quote. So to dishonor them like that, I will show you apropos balance in karma.

Enjoy! :D

Historical Perspective: Commercial Aviation Terrorism and Air Marshals
Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS)

First Phase

The first major act of criminal violence against a U.S. airliner occurred on November 1, 1955, when Jack Graham, hoping to collect his mother's life insurance policy, placed a bomb in luggage belonging to his mother and killed all 44 people on board a Denver-bound plane.

Of the 177 worldwide hijacking attempts between 1958 and 1969, 80 percent originated in the Western Hemisphere and 77 percent either originated in Cuba or were efforts to divert planes to Cuba.

The incidents involving Cuba happened in several distinct phases. The first wave of hijackings began in 1958, after Fidel Castro had taken control of Cuba. Those hijackings were primarily attempts by anti-Castro individuals to divert Cuban planes to the United States. A number of Cuban boats were also hijacked to the United States. Immediately after the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961, the direction of the hijackings reversed and there was a wave of diversions of U.S. planes to Cuba, many of these carried out by Cuban exiles.

In late 1961, President John F. Kennedy initiated the first U.S. sky marshal program as a deterrent to these increased hijackings to and from Cuba. The U.S. government began using marshals on commercial planes when requested by the airlines or the FBI. In September of 1961, President John F. Kennedy signed legislation that prescribed the death penalty or at least 20 years' imprisonment for air piracy.

As the program grew, Cuban hijacking attempts declined rapidly. Only a handful of hijacking incidents occurred between 1962-1967.

Throughout the early to late 1960s, sky marshal staffing levels were kept quite low. However, in 1968, the nature of hijackings began to enter a new phase.
Transportation Hijackings

The first American hijacking attempt in 1968 occurred on February 9, when a U.S. Marine unsuccessfully attempted to hijack a military charter flight out of South Vietnam. The first attempt in the United States followed shortly thereafter, on February 17, 1968, when a private plane was hijacked from Florida to Cuba. Four days later the first hijacking of a scheduled Kirline flight to Cuba was attempted, committed by an escaped murderer. A myriad of similar incidents followed. In 1968, a total of 19 hijackings of domestic U.S. flights to Cuba plus a hijacking of a U.S. registered plane from the Bahamas to Cuba were committed.

The hijacking pattern of 1968 continued in 1969, the most prolific year for hijacking incidents in the United States. Many of the hijackers sought Cuba. Airliners carried approach plans for the Havana airport and crews were instructed not to resist hijackers. However, in October 1969, an AWOL Marine named Raphael Minichiello boarded a Los Angeles-San Francisco flight and hijacked it to Rome. That incident set a record for greatest distance traveled by a hijacker. Ten days later there was a hijacking attempt by a 14-year-old boy in Cincinnati who, his mother claimed, had been influenced by the publicity.

Following the hijacking of eight airliners to Cuba in January 1969, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) created the Task Force on the Deterrence of Air Piracy. The Task Force developed a hijacker “profile” that could be used along with metal detectors in screening passengers. In October, Eastern Air Lines began using the system, and four more airlines followed in 1970.

Although far more hijackings occurred in the United States than in any other country, hijacking was now a worldwide concern. Peak years for transportation hijacking outside the United States were 1969 and 1970. Between 1968 and 1972, there were almost as many hijackings to Cuba from outside the United States as there were from within. The majority of those incidents took place in Latin America. In addition to the foreign hijackings to Cuba, there were 22 attempts to hijack planes from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, a number of transportation hijackings in the Middle East, as well as many isolated incidents around the world.
Extortion Hijackings

In the 1968-72 period, extortion became a new reason for hijackings. The first extortion attempt during the peak period occurred outside the United States. Following the Arab Israeli war of 1967 and the hijacking and diversion to Algeria of a plane carrying Congonese political leader Moise Tshombe, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PLFP) hijacked an Israeli airliner to Algiers on July 23, 1968 (Phillips 1973). With the cooperation of the Algerian government, the hijackers demanded Israel free a number of Palestinian guerrillas in return for the release of the passengers. That incident was followed by a series of incidents related to Middle East terrorist groups. The first extortion hijacking in the United States, the first modern hijacking for money, occurred in June 1970 when Arthur Barkley held a plane hostage at Dulles Airport, demanding a $100 million ransom from the U.S. government, until he was eventually over-powered.

For almost a year after Barkley's attempt, extortion hijackings occurred exclusively outside the United States. In September of 1970, the simultaneous hijacking by the PFLP of two American planes and a Swiss plane, along with an unsuccessful attempt to hijack an Israeli plane occurred. Three days later a British plane was also hijacked. Three of the planes were taken to an airstrip in Jordan, the fourth to Cairo, and all were later destroyed by explosives.

These events convinced the White House that a more robust aviation security policy was required. In September of 1970, President Richard Nixon announced a comprehensive anti-hijacking plan that included a sky marshal program to provide armed security aboard U.S. aircraft.

An increase in hijackings prior to 1972 stimulated the development of passenger-screening requirements. The goal was to identify passengers carrying metallic weapons that could be used to hijack an airplane.

The PFLP hijackings had repercussions overseas, because in the months that followed groups with political demands hijacked Costa Rican, Indian, and Iranian aircraft. It was not until the end of May 1971, that another extortion hijacking occurred in the United States. That hijacker successfully held a plane for ransom and then ordered it to fly to Nassau, Bahamas, where he was arrested.

On November 24, 1971, a man boarded a flight in Portland, Oregon, under the name of D. B. Cooper. He hijacked the plane, demanded a ransom of $200,000 and two parachutes. His demands were met and he later parachuted from the plane with the money. He was never found. However, the idea of a parachute escape did not originate with Cooper. A hijacker who held a Canadian plane for ransom just 12 days earlier had attempted unsuccessfully to bail out.

A wave of extortion attempts followed the Cooper hijacking. In the following month there were two attempts, including one by a hijacker who demanded a parachute in an apparent attempt to imitate Cooper. Of the 31 U.S. hijacking attempts in 1972,19 involved extortion and 15 were by hijackers who demanded parachutes. Of 111 total transportation-hijacking attempts between 1968 and 1972, 90 were attempts to reach Cuba. Hijacking for money also became common overseas.

Three months after the Cooper hijacking, the PFLP hijacked a West German plane, released the passengers, and held the plane for a $5 million ransom. At least eight other foreign planes were hijacked for ransom in 1972, including flights from Australia, Brazil and Indonesia, by individuals who planned D.B. Cooper-style parachute escapes.

With the formation of a full-time sky marshal program and a greater emphasis placed on aviation security in general, the hijacking rate in the United States began to decline in late 1972. In 1974, the FAA was delegated exclusive responsibility to direct law enforcement efforts for aircraft in-flight. Program staffing went down significantly and stayed at those levels until 1985.

So much for people overwhelming the hijackers, as this little pseudo-Taoist wants to believe.
 
You're an idiot Roshambo a TRUE idiot. There is no growth in Taoism, NONE. The main teaching is non-ado and unlearning all that the world has taught you, it's reversion not progress, regress NOT growth. Growth is the polar opposite of Taoism. Research before you come out talking non stop about cycles, all I read was blah blah blah cycles blah blah cyclical growth. You read an encyclopedic entry and all of a sudden have a full grasp of a 2800 year old religion with a 4,000 year tradition? COME ON!! You're talking Zen Buddhism (the lines are blurred yet the practise and outcome are different) when I'm speaking of something that has nothing to do with Siddharta or the Buddhas. To say that I am pseudo Taoist is essentially the same as calling me pseudo Miller-Christian, as I was raised such and spent my childhood reading the bible cover to cover.

That crash in 1999 was AFTER it handed landed. That's about as relevant as taking off and crashing.

Secondarily, how many of these hijackers used box cutters in the past? That's what I thought, NONE!!!! Any of the hijackers that used anything less than a gun ("HIGH" jackers) were only ATTEMPTS. It shows it in your little quote there Rosh. They do not mess with hijackers that use guns. Why should they? How many bullets do they have? How many people could they kill?

Here's another hint for all of you willing to dig, look at the PASSENGER LIST on the flight that went down in Penn. on 9/11. If you have the slightest clue of who's who you'll find one of Prescott Bush Jr.'s business associates. If you don't even know who Prescott is you never had the right to even post in this thread. PERIOD. You haven't a clue about SHIT. Most of you never will if you haven't come this far yet. The truth is available while the DNS system stays with the non-profit organization in California (not for long, trust me). You probably don't even know THEIR name do you? Good luck finding anything electronically once that ceases to be.

The change of my avatar shows true colors for only this forum. You take the weakest, or what you think is the weakest argument of mine and distort it, then attack it with a combination of revelry and disregard for the fact that there is a human being on the other side. You use stupid links that have proved nothing to try and contradict my stronger arguments. You automatically curse any view point that goes against what you're taught from organizations that get their data en masse from another organization who in turn get it from another organization who get it from this bureau who get it from some fucking twat's uncle's cousin's wife until it's hard to say what the original source was. Add to that they'll color any story any way you like as long as the base is green.

Anyway, I'm not wanted here so like a negro in the deep south, I'm moving North. Have FUN!!! GOOD LUCK!!! AND HAVE A GREAT LIFE!!!
 
inane said:
(Snip more irrelevancy with the same consistency and irrationality as most wicca, Scientologists, and Mormons, that it would impress any of the three as to the amount of spin.)

Secondarily, how many of these hijackers used box cutters in the past? That's what I thought, NONE!!!! Any of the hijackers that used anything less than a gun ("HIGH" jackers) were only ATTEMPTS. It shows it in your little quote there Rosh. They do not mess with hijackers that use guns. Why should they? How many bullets do they have? How many people could they kill?

Now you are assuming all of those hijackings, including the >30 in 72 alone, were using guns.

So you are unlearning what the world has been teaching you, huh? Like how to get your facts before you look like a moron? The only relevance you have to "hijacking" is that indeed, you are surely are high, Jack.

Also,

Look up hijack at Dictionary.com
1923, Amer.Eng., from high(way) + jacker "one who holds up." Originally "to rob (a bootlegger, smuggler, etc.) in transit;" sense of "seizing an aircraft in flight" is 1968 (also in 1961 variant skyjack), extended 1970s to any form of public transportation.

Oh, dear...I guess I am supposed to unlearn the entymology of hijack and go by yours, because that definition is the definition that came before, and therefore to be Taoist I would have to unlearn it.

I don't think so, kid. :D

(Snip more clueless, unbased rabmling.)

The change of my avatar shows true colors for only this forum. You take the weakest, or what you think is the weakest argument of mine and distort it, then attack it with a combination of revelry and disregard for the fact that there is a human being on the other side.

No, I know there is a human being on the other side, and they are a fucking idiot.

You use stupid links that have proved nothing to try and contradict my stronger arguments.

You haven't argued anything other than a series of tenuous connections at best, without posting any facts of your own. You then make moronic quantifications about terrorism, claims that an ignorant shit like you really has no business speaking about without any backing - REMEMBER - as the one with the wild idea, the burdon of proof is on you. You haven't proven a damn thing.

You automatically curse any view point that goes against what you're taught from organizations that get their data en masse from another organization who in turn get it from another organization who get it from this bureau who get it from some fucking twat's uncle's cousin's wife until it's hard to say what the original source was. Add to that they'll color any story any way you like as long as the base is green.

Amazing that you paint that view onto me when you again haven't done any research about what you are trying to talk about. You post garbage, then throw up a religion you have no basis within as some kind of excuse. Again, I have to note that you are a cowardly shit for doing so. The fault and burdon lies upon you to prove, not your religion, not us, not some great conspiracy in the sky. If you want us to believe something, you will have to do a little better than "because I say so!" We could have any number of people post shit on this forum, but unless there is some rational backing behind it (other than what sounds like the basis of Scientology on a coke bender), then don't bother posting about it here.

Your blathering without any basis, fact, or background makes you irrelevant, and even less welcome here than your moronic and jealous tirade over at FMF.

Anyway, I'm not wanted here so like a negro in the deep south, I'm moving North. Have FUN!!! GOOD LUCK!!! AND HAVE A GREAT LIFE!!!

We will. Our lives will be much better without your presence, as would the world. You, however, will still be a fucking moron. You have our condolences.
 
inane said:
The truth is available while the DNS system stays with the non-profit organization in California (not for long, trust me). You probably don't even know THEIR name do you? Good luck finding anything electronically once that ceases to be.
"I NOEZ OF ICANN & U DONT COS IM TEH SMARTEST OLOLOLOLOL!!!11" God, you're fucking moron. ICANN can't make changes to the DNS without the approval from the US Department of Commerce (you know, the very department which spawned them). "Independent" indeed. I assume you're also ignorant of the fact that DNS isn't essential to the functioning of the Internet, or that it is a distributed system. ICANN only assigns the top-level domain names (i.e. domains of large, world-spanning and nation-spanning networks, like .com, .biz, .us, .de, .cz, .hr etc.), while lower-level domains are under control of national bodies. So if I wanted to set up a home server and name it www.destroyamerica.hr, I would request the domain from SRCE, which is the roof Croatian organization in charge of all Internet-related activity (including DNS). ICANN would neither know nor care about this.

The change of my avatar shows true colors for only this forum. You take the weakest, or what you think is the weakest argument of mine and distort it, then attack it with a combination of revelry and disregard for the fact that there is a human being on the other side.
Good thing you provided ample weak arguments to shoot down.

You use stupid links that have proved nothing to try and contradict my stronger arguments.
"Arguments"? Sounded more like incoherent ramblings of an uneducated dimwit.

You automatically curse any view point that goes against what you're taught from organizations that get their data en masse from another organization who in turn get it from another organization who get it from this bureau who get it from some fucking twat's uncle's cousin's wife until it's hard to say what the original source was. Add to that they'll color any story any way you like as long as the base is green.
Are you sure you're 23? You sound like you're 13, and mildly retarded to boot.

Anyway, I'm not wanted here so like a negro in the deep south, I'm moving North. Have FUN!!! GOOD LUCK!!! AND HAVE A GREAT LIFE!!!
Good. One less idiot around.
 
Back
Top