Mass battles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
I always like it when about 40 people just start shooting at one another, means you don't have so much power over who dies and means no matter how good you are, something bad will happen.

And can't we have big religions as well, which you could join with. Most of the wars on this planet are over Religion, Israel, N. Ireland etc.

M
 
It would not be so good with mass battles beckause in turnbased it would take to long before you can shoot. Imagine waiting 39 rounds before you are able to shot. It could be used in fallout tactics (real time) but in fallout? then it would have to be real time.
 
yes it wouldnt be so good in Fallout....
but a big attack on some target with groups fighting everyvere.......
 
You have a good idea. Being in the services I like the idea of huge glorioius battles. Blood-soaked soil, the air thick with gunsmoke and the barking of machine guns, y'know? Stuff that gets you into the game and to really like your NPC's who take a bullet for you and watch your back. But the whole turnbased system would drag that down. I know I hate waiting so long for every single person in a town to move two spaces during a fight in a city. It takes too long. But then if Real Time does happen, you wouldn't get a chance to heal up and reload and you would die too fast. Now what seems interesting is a first person shooter like Doom or something. Then it could be realtime as you could use buildings as cover and return fire from strategic locales. That would be interesting, a Fallout first person, kinda like Rainbow Six.

I'm John Handy, I'm down from Canada.
 
combat speed

Hopefully the game could be run at a speed which meant that several turns happened at once (not yours though). Like in Braveheart or Gangsters, they were sucky I know but on a smaller scale it could work.

M
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top