Here is digital proof from 2006 of the existence of disputed Fallout compilations prior to Bethesda buying the license:
http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=350188
Bethesda's greed and arrogance is getting them in trouble which is nothing new and proof of when a company gets too big and ready for the bigger they are the harder they fall scenario.
Their statement of the non existence of the Fallout trilogy and Saga games prior to their purchase of the IP in 2007 are out and out indefensible lies. It is Bethesda that in fact wants us to believe in the alternate Universe where these games were not released until 2009 since they did not hit it big until now. All you have to do is look for these already released games used online at amazon and other places in bargain bins and even petition fans to send snapshots and even allow the release of the used products.
also they wanted an injunction since they believe Interplay is harming their market when Bethesda is actually taking steps to prevent Interplay from selling anything related to fallout which actually does and has and will continue to harm Interplay.
Bethesda was arrogant enough to argue Interplay's side as theirs. This is textbook bad lawyer 101.
The situation with Interplay's claim of fulfilling all the rights to keep working on the MMO seem clear cut but are not exactly since Bethesda prevented Interplay from advertising that they are working on the MMO. If a company was working on the MMO for a 150 million dollar selling game, there would be plenty of investors interested in buying debt convertible into discounted shares when the game is released and someone would have given them a 30 million credit line in exchange for a good cut of future company profits via clipped coupon rate of notes, bonds, loan.
Bethesda's gluttony for Interplay's piece of the pie prevented Interplay from saying anything to anybody in the investment world until the clock ran out just as Bethesda intended. This is clear and malicious intent to harm your contract partner.
It is Bethesda's immense greed that is completely unveiled in this case in that they will stoop as low as lying outright to the Judge(contempt of court anyone?) in order to coerce the courts to do something that negates the contract in essence. With no MMO and loss of back catalog rights, Interplay is left with a castrated contract. This is not what was signed in 2007.
Bethesda, Fallout IP owners or not, are attempting to write Interplay out of the contract while Interplay skirts the 30 million dollars raised issue.
What if they actually have the 30 million but have been playing possum? What would Bethesda do? Tell the judge 30 million prior to recent dollar depreciation?
I have not had the time to read the full rebuttal but if this is what Bethesda's counter claim is, then they are in deeper trouble than I thought.
Outright lying to a judge in the face of indisputable contrary evidence is a sign of desperation by Bethesda and utter incompetence by its overpaid lawyers.
Pride comes right before Bethesda drops and gives us 20.