RedRockRun
First time out of the vault

Fallout 4 spoilers ahead:
To begin, there definitely seems to be a theme throughout the Fallout franchise of people and organizations who feel the need to not only rebuild the world but rebuild Humanity. In the case of The Master, it's a very literal, genetic rebuilding, whereas the Enclave takes more of a "Clean the slate" approach. Therefore I find it interesting how people like Mr. House and Father see themselves as messianic-like figures who shoulder the burden of humanity or what they believe humanity to be.
I wonder then how both would regard each other. No one, at least in my opinion, has goals as lofty as Mr. House, yet he is nothing if not pragmatic. I think that's what endears me to him; so many fictional villains are so obviously delusional, the dramatic irony being that they are the only ones unaware of that fact. House though is nearly as precise as the computers he invented.
This comes in contrast to Father, who despite creating objectively more advanced robots, is more blinded by his own holy vision of himself, his organization, and his goals. Yet for all Father's cult-like visage, it's hard to argue with results. There's something to be said about how advanced the Institute is.
On the other hand, aesthetics aren't everything. House managed to create order from chaos and literally tame the savages of the Mojave. After his speech about his plans for the future, I didn't doubt that he could achieve his goals and get men into space.
Anyway, your all's thoughts?
To begin, there definitely seems to be a theme throughout the Fallout franchise of people and organizations who feel the need to not only rebuild the world but rebuild Humanity. In the case of The Master, it's a very literal, genetic rebuilding, whereas the Enclave takes more of a "Clean the slate" approach. Therefore I find it interesting how people like Mr. House and Father see themselves as messianic-like figures who shoulder the burden of humanity or what they believe humanity to be.
I wonder then how both would regard each other. No one, at least in my opinion, has goals as lofty as Mr. House, yet he is nothing if not pragmatic. I think that's what endears me to him; so many fictional villains are so obviously delusional, the dramatic irony being that they are the only ones unaware of that fact. House though is nearly as precise as the computers he invented.
This comes in contrast to Father, who despite creating objectively more advanced robots, is more blinded by his own holy vision of himself, his organization, and his goals. Yet for all Father's cult-like visage, it's hard to argue with results. There's something to be said about how advanced the Institute is.
On the other hand, aesthetics aren't everything. House managed to create order from chaos and literally tame the savages of the Mojave. After his speech about his plans for the future, I didn't doubt that he could achieve his goals and get men into space.
Anyway, your all's thoughts?