No it doesn't. It talks about the impact of terrorism on the economy and consumer confidence. It does not in any way, shape or form talk about travel or the delay of flights, which is what the specific topic of discussion was.Nuerof said:The page demonstrated how the subjective cost of terrorism is only proportional to the delay of flights, travel and the economy
Besides that, that's a pretty useless point since it's obvious to anyone that the damage a terrorist attack can do to the economy is proportional to the state of the economy prior to such an attack.
That's not at all what I asked for either.Nuerof said:as you asked for...
Here's what you claimed:
I then asked where someone considered that and how that could be.Nuerof said:Actually it has been considered that the economic cost from delaying the flights woud, if given to charity, save more people than the terrorist attack would be removed.
You then provide me with two links, who say the following on the topic of delaying flights:
ZILCH.