No DLC on PS3 for Fo3

Matt K said:
I actually don't understand why BS would do this. Correct me if I'm wrong but I would imagine that the income that would come from PS3 owners would outweigh any bonus from MS for exclusivity. So from a purely financial view this makes little sense
Click to expand...
It's probably the same thing that happened with the GTA IV DLC. They paid a lot of dough for that one (50 mil or something), not to mention the ridiculous amount they must've paid to get Square-Enix to fork over Final Fantasy XIII.
MS's strategy seems to be 'throw money at them until they concede' so I doubt BS are unhappy.


edit:
Also, my flatmate has a PS3 and I almost play it more than my Wii, so I guess I'm in the club as well.
Would've bought one anyway if he didn't have one. There's no reason to own a 360 if you have a capable PC and a PS3 since all 360 games come to one of those eventually.
 
At first MS battled Sony with exclusive games, now it's exclusive DLC. What's next? Exclusive patches?
 
My PC wouldn't run FO3 very well, so I'm going to be getting it for my PS3, so this news kind of bummed me out.

Although, for most of the DLC for Oblivion, the only two decent bits were Knights of the Nine and Shivering Isles.

The rest was all crap.
 
DLC?

Cool my favorite game series has just been sold out by microsoft. Hopefully the DLC isn't anything necessary... if it is an expansion that will be bullshit. The other 2 didn't have an "expansion" and thats how it should be. If the DLC is more so along the lines of being able to stuff a gernade in your rocket launcher or some shit I am okay with that. This game seems to be moreso Microsoft biased but whatevs. The 360 is the system all the "cool kids" are playing, you know, the ones that have never played fallout or fallout 2 in their lives? Oh did I mention I am a PS3 gamer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top