About the article: He's right about nearly all of it, the few places he was mistaken were corrected in the replies (like the bit about the PS3 HDD). It all wasn't anything really new, though.
So... Honestly, the Wii is the only one I've even given the benefit of the doubt to.
Part of that's because Nintendo hasn't been hyping it up as "Next-Gen". They're just saying it's fun. And really, isn't that what gaming's supposed to be about?
Yet they're the only ones making any actual "Next-Gen" advancement, through the controller. Yet at the same time, they're trying to bring gaming back to the glory days of true mass appeal (ARCADES, ANYONE?). More power to them. I do enjoy true RPGs, strategy and the like, but sometimes...
Well, it's just a great move. The pointlessly increased complexity in so many games recently had turned off a lot of people. (More than a few Females, and nearly all older people of both genders who used to be gamers back in the non-plurality of buttons days)
Pick up and play, baby. True NEXT-GEN, Brought in with a BLAST FROM THE PAST. Ironic in so many ways.
Schuljunge said:
i had the same expierience with SplinterCell1 to SplinterCell2. those games have almost the same graphic+engine and still you need to buy new shit.
...What? Splinter Cell and SC2 (Pandora Tomorrow) didn't have any difference in requirements. I ran them on an old GeForce 3 Ti200/Athlon XP 1600+/512MB RAM machine with no problems whatsoever. Guess what? Same thing with Splinter Cell 3 (Chaos Theory). Sure, the CPU load got pretty heavy at times in Chaos Theory because of the MUCH bigger levels, but it was more than playable. And worth it.
And what do you mean, "buy new shit"? The GF3 needed to play Chaos Theory was nearly 4 year old tech at the time.
You must have had a GF2 Ultra, or something. I can't see any other pre-GF3 card pulling SC1 and 2. Even then, you must have had a pretty good CPU to help it along. But that wouldn't really make much sense, if you were using more than 5 year outdated graphics card tech.