POLL: Trump or Hillary

TRUMP OR HILLARY FOR US PRESIDENT 2016?

  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 30 34.5%
  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 10 11.5%
  • Just shoot me already

    Votes: 47 54.0%

  • Total voters
    87
  • Poll closed .
Just wanted to point out that shit goes in both directions.
Voting machines misbehaved years ago, too. But there it also worked in the correct direction.
 
Just wanted to point out that shit goes in both directions.
Voting machines misbehaved years ago, too. But there it also worked in the correct direction.
Yea but you got to admit theres some difference between some random woman in Iowa trying to vote twice and an international powerplayer and manipulator owning multiple voting machines whilst donating to one of the canidates.
 
Last edited:
and details on the whole INTERNATIONAL JEW OWNS AMERICAN VOTING MACHINES thing as found on (incidentally!) jewish search engine google: http://www.snopes.com/george-soros-controls-smartmatic-voting-machines-in-16-states/
>snopes.com
>literally explains everything away with "ITS JUST A COINCIDENCE"
>talking about Soros' very real acitivities that are well documented means I hate all jews and my distrust of him comes from that and not his entire history of shady dealings
I see your lack of cohesion and intelligence bleeds into every topic you post about.
At least you've managed to somewhat get the English language right compared to last time I saw you post.
 
im talking to a /pol/tard, so i just let you set the bar.

it doesn't explain everything away with "IT'S JUST A COINCIDENCE", it points out that the company named as providing the georgey-rigged voting machines in this conspiracy theory HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY VOTING MACHINES IN THIS ELECTION.

you like brietbart, the daily mail, general conspiracy crack and call me unintelligent. get out of your pickup and stomp your hick rubber boots into the pharmacy and refill your zyprexa you freckled inbred butt-baby
 
im talking to a /pol/tard, so i just let you set the bar

you like brietbart, the daily mail, general conspiracy crack and call me unintelligent. get out of your pickup and stomp your hick rubber boots into the pharmacy and refill your zyprexa you freckled inbred butt-baby
Not an argument GTFO
 
My point is you should slim down your posts, removing the non argument bits.

Anyway the bit I edited out was a non argument anyway since you provided no stats of evidence at all to back up your claim,
did you click the link? --do you know what a hyperlink is?
 
I think tattoos are awesome, and i think it looks attractive, I even think the ''suicide girl''(not what it sounds like it just means a lot of tattoos.) style is quite nice.
I mean it's attractive in a visual, sexual way like a fetish but I'd never want to seriously date/marry someone covered in tattoos like that.
 
I mean it's attractive in a visual, sexual way like a fetish but I'd never want to seriously date/marry someone covered in tattoos like that.
>covered in tattoos
>has two small and unobtrusive tattoos
Huh.
 
I just noticed you added "I fuck chickens" to my post.

My estimation of your mental age is 11
damn, i was hoping you'd miss that

ok so apparently i need to trim down my insults, when i was only questioning vergil's credentials as my psychometrist when he asks me to take abject conspiracy crack seriously and not mock it
 
>covered in tattoos
>has two small and unobtrusive tattoos
Huh.
I'm guessing you've never heard of/seen any of the "Suicide Girls" that the poster was referring to?

As far as @doomsdaypreppe
r's post goes she's not covered in tattoos but what little she has is stupid enough enough.
 
I mean it's attractive in a visual, sexual way like a fetish but I'd never want to seriously date/marry someone covered in tattoos like that.
I would, tattoos are just ink, that doesn't define a person.

I have the Witcher wolf medallion tattoed on my shoulder and overarm, and most people i know have tattoo's or planning to get one.
 
Back
Top