Since i played fallout and baldur'sgate ,most of gamesboreme

[Dragula]

The combat was in the lines of PT, FUBAR. But Lionheart still offered an intresting world, intresting dialouges and overall a fun experience.

 

[gregor_y]

There. I fixed it for you.

Give me your adress i will fix you too...for free thats for friends are for

 

[Ausdoerrt]

The combat was in the lines of PT, FUBAR. But Lionheart still offered an intresting world, intresting dialouges and overall a fun experience.

Agreed. The Rennaissance-style world was lots of fun, even if historically completely inaccurate. TBH, the combat didn't bother me so much as long as there was a reward in terms of story and dialogue. It's just as toward the end the dungeons got longer, the story bits shorter and less interesting.

The SPECIAL system was adapted really well though, and I liked the take on magic and leveling, sort of a middle ground b/w FO and Arcanum.

 

[Alphadrop]

Agreed. The Rennaissance-style world was lots of fun, even if historically completely inaccurate.

Wait so there wasn't magic and human/demon hybrids in Elizabethan times?

Well that explains the low mark in my History A-Level.

 

[Dragula]

Wait so there wasn't magic and human/demon hybrids in Elizabethan times?

There was no Joan of Arc either.